Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

Lost horespower....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2005, 01:08 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default Lost horespower....

It seems Scion like all the Japaneese car companies have been rating their HP higher than the actual amount.
There is a new standard in place now. When the Scion xB was tested, it show about 102 HP, NOT 108. In fact ALL the rice burners out there have been overated when it comes to power. Acuras flagship is down about 20 ponies..
The American cars have been UNDER rated. They are producing about 20HP on average HIGHER than advertised.

I knew my xB felt slooooow for a reason... and why my other car feels MUCH faster than its rated ...
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:15 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 546
Default

It's a new SAE test method. All the "Japanese" vehicles used older SAE method. Japanese automakers switch to the new protocol because of some law in California. What matters is WHP not bHP. The average dyno I've read on stock xBs average around 92-93WHP.
Keitaro is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:24 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Keitaro
It's a new SAE test method. All the "Japanese" vehicles used older SAE method. Japanese automakers switch to the new protocol because of some law in California. What matters is WHP not bHP. The average dyno I've read on stock xBs average around 92-93WHP.
They were comparing the older SAE method to the new for ALL cars. Everyone was under the "old" SAE method of testing. My point still stands... the Japanese cars have been over-rated and the American cars under-rated.
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:28 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Chnchapters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sterling Hts, MI
Posts: 19
Default

are u kidding me...

ur telling me that you thought ur xB was slow because you could just feel that it didn't quite seem like 108 horse power, and it that 5 horsepower makes that much of a difference.
I find that very hard to believe that your gonna jump in a car and tell me that it feels like 102 and not 108.
Chnchapters is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:31 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Chnchapters
are u kidding me...

ur telling me that you thought ur xB was slow because you could just feel that it didn't quite seem like 108 horse power, and it that 5 horsepower makes that much of a difference.
I find that very hard to believe that your gonna jump in a car and tell me that it feels like 102 and not 108.
Get real... I didn't lose 5Hp because of what someone wrote. My xB is still the same... its just as slow as its been from day one. But still adequate....

5HP from 108 is almost 5% ... we're not talking about a 5HP drop from a 405HP machine... which would be diddly..
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:49 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
xA_Factor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 762
Default

No cars of any make/model/type actually lost or gained power. It's just being measured differently.
xA_Factor is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:56 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Prototype_xB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Goldsboro, NC
Posts: 4,106
Default

imports--> Overrated to attract customers
Domestics--> Underrated to reduce insurance premiums
Prototype_xB is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:57 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Prototype_xB
imports--> Overrated to attract customers
Domestics--> Underrated to reduce insurance premiums
Ah... finally, someone who understands....
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 02:15 AM
  #9  
Max
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member


SL Member
 
Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,971
Default

Good read.

http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosins...A01-283759.htm
Max is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 02:22 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Max
That says it well..
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 02:25 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Keitaro
It's a new SAE test method. All the "Japanese" vehicles used older SAE method. Japanese automakers switch to the new protocol because of some law in California. What matters is WHP not bHP. The average dyno I've read on stock xBs average around 92-93WHP.
Not so.. it is the same measure, they are just making sure everyone tests the same for compliance. Many have been cheating..
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 02:39 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
superjeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Elmira, NY
Posts: 2,140
Default

I want a 5% refund. bassturds.
superjeer is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 02:56 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
 
gjpjr84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth
Posts: 7,521
Default

Originally Posted by Prototype_xB
imports--> Overrated to attract customers
Domestics--> Underrated to reduce insurance premiums

so obious yet it never came to mind.
gjpjr84 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:49 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
I_dont_know's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by Chnchapters
are u kidding me...

ur telling me that you thought ur xB was slow because you could just feel that it didn't quite seem like 108 horse power, and it that 5 horsepower makes that much of a difference.
I find that very hard to believe that your gonna jump in a car and tell me that it feels like 102 and not 108.
do we not know how to do math anymore?
I_dont_know is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:52 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
firesquare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 4,669
Default

the only underrated car your talking about is the SRT-4

plus we only start off with 108HP so i wouldnt worry too much on what horsepoer we have anyways, were all too slow to notice or care about it anyways.

the underrating and overrating is mostly for insurance companies and such. plus the public would turn away at too much horsepower also.
firesquare is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 04:25 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
hotbox05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Posts: 13,706
Default Re: Lost horespower....

Originally Posted by mikem53
It seems Scion like all the Japaneese car companies have been rating their HP higher than the actual amount.
There is a new standard in place now. When the Scion xB was tested, it show about 102 HP, NOT 108. In fact ALL the rice burners out there have been overated when it comes to power. Acuras flagship is down about 20 ponies..
The American cars have been UNDER rated. They are producing about 20HP on average HIGHER than advertised.

I knew my xB felt slooooow for a reason... and why my other car feels MUCH faster than its rated ...
that's a lie. at least on the domestic part.

hell the new cobalt ss supercharged is grossly over rated.

it doesnt matter anyways it's all rated at the crank which is bs no matter what.
hotbox05 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 12:20 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by firesquare
the only underrated car your talking about is the SRT-4

plus we only start off with 108HP so i wouldnt worry too much on what horsepoer we have anyways, were all too slow to notice or care about it anyways.
No ... we only start off with 102HP which is the point of the post, we have been decieved.

the underrating and overrating is mostly for insurance companies and such. plus the public would turn away at too much horsepower also.
Yeah.. we all hate HP and would never buy a car with too much... yeah right
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 12:27 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
mikem53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 516
Default Re: Lost horespower....

Originally Posted by hotbox05
Originally Posted by mikem53
It seems Scion like all the Japaneese car companies have been rating their HP higher than the actual amount.
There is a new standard in place now. When the Scion xB was tested, it show about 102 HP, NOT 108. In fact ALL the rice burners out there have been overated when it comes to power. Acuras flagship is down about 20 ponies..
The American cars have been UNDER rated. They are producing about 20HP on average HIGHER than advertised.

I knew my xB felt slooooow for a reason... and why my other car feels MUCH faster than its rated ...
that's a lie. at least on the domestic part.

hell the new cobalt ss supercharged is grossly over rated.

it doesnt matter anyways it's all rated at the crank which is bs no matter what.
Its not a lie. Thats what the new testing proves. It shows the domestics are actually reporting lower numbers than what they are producing. And the japanese reporting higher. At the crank or at the wheels, who cares? It is still power being measured. So you don't care if you have 250 or 200 HP since its measured at the crank?
mikem53 is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 12:37 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
ChrisLimEditionXB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fairfax Station, VA
Posts: 292
Default

from what i've heard....... that means u can't yell at me if i am wrong..... but i heard that everyone measures it by the crank shaft and not to the wheels..... therefore.... it is 108hp but not to the wheels aft bringing it to the wheels u get to around where someone said 92-93hp and i jsut dyno'd my car a couple of weekends ago.... and i got 98hp bc i had a CAI and a sports exhausts
ChrisLimEditionXB is offline  
Old 10-12-2005, 01:03 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Chnchapters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sterling Hts, MI
Posts: 19
Default

Horsepower is not measured at the wheels...
Chnchapters is offline  


Quick Reply: Lost horespower....



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 PM.