Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

pulled over for windows and exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:22 AM
  #1  
TOAST3R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 661
From: Sheboygan, WI
Default pulled over for windows and exhaust

I got pulled over tonight, the cop said my exhaust was illegal and my windows were too dark. i had my front ones down. so it was factory tint he was complaining about. he didnt have a light meter though. so i need to goto the dmv or soemthing he said to have them check it.

he also said my exhaust was too loud. its a GReddy SP2 with a dc sports header and aem intake. so they got to check that too i guess.

anyone else have these problems yet? my exhaust doesnt seem much louder than factory. ill have to look into it and stuff tomorow. im gonna go play halo2 now.

but any suggestions would be good
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 11:00 AM
  #2  
TheDanger's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,249
Default

It seems he was just acting like a dick...get it checked out if he wrote you up and prove him wrong.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 01:52 PM
  #3  
Munch's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,426
Default

Well you're gonna beat the window tint thing for the rear windows, but the front 2 might give you problems.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
BoxPilot's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 22
Default

That is definately a cop on a power trip. I had a civic a while back that had legal tint and this cop gave me shnizzle about one night. It was dusk so it looked a lot darker then it was. I told him to get off my case its legal and he was like I am calling the officer with the light meter and you are getting a ticket. I had nothing to do so I sipped on my mocha while the rectum inspector and his buddy put their meter all over the car to find a dark spot. Then when they started looking over the car for something else to write me up for I laughed and said you guys are pathetic you can look all you want but you cant get me for nothing except oops that coffee spill on your nice white cruiser hhehehe. After about 45 min and a mocha and a muffin they decided they didnt have anything on me.
so then it went like this
RI: I am going to write you a warning.
Me: For what?
RI: For dark tint.
Me: Call your seargent, you have wasted 45 min of my time and this is turning into a prime case of harrassment. Your just jealous you dont have a ride as fine as mine.
RI: I dont need to call my seargent I am writing you a warning and thats that and if you give me any more lip I will arrest you.
(now is a good time to tell you I shoot with a bunch of the local and state patrol near me and I know what my rights are :twisted: )
Me: Start writing but this one is going to cost you. I start to dial 911 which gets his attention.
RI: who are you calling?
Me: 911 I need to report a case of police harassment. And your badge number is please?
RI: Mumbles some police jargon in his radio but obvious his seargent is on the way.

end result was the sargent showed up and starting asking him what the deal was, got out his meter checked the car, looked it over appologised to me profusely for wasting over an hour of my time and proceeded to verbally rip I am assuming this new rookie a new ___ hehehe.

needless to say I avoid that city now but what a great time it was to watch him squirm.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #5  
squirrel's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Default

I would still go to IAD if I were you. 45 minutes for a traffic enforcement IS excessive. Asking to see the Suppervisor and refusing is prolly a violation of his dept's General Orders and Maunal of Rules.

And yes, I'm in the same line of work. BUT, I have better things to do and my stops don't take 45 minutes. And I have a better understanding of the Vehicle Code.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #6  
EVILDAVE's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
AlphaSquad

SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,771
From: Nor-Cal
Default

Originally Posted by squirrel
I would still go to IAD if I were you. 45 minutes for a traffic enforcement IS excessive. Asking to see the Suppervisor and refusing is prolly a violation of his dept's General Orders and Maunal of Rules.

And yes, I'm in the same line of work. BUT, I have better things to do and my stops don't take 45 minutes. And I have a better understanding of the Vehicle Code.
Ya Brad likes to pull over little old ladies for going too slow! :twisted:
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 03:34 PM
  #7  
TOAST3R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 661
From: Sheboygan, WI
Default

well im on my way to go get it checked out now. and the cop never saw my front windows, they were down. he was whining about my rear windows and stuff.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #8  
Munch's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,426
Default

Originally Posted by TOAST3R
well im on my way to go get it checked out now. and the cop never saw my front windows, they were down. he was whining about my rear windows and stuff.
Good luck bro
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #9  
UnFocused's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,183
From: Southern Oregon
Default

well Ive posted before about a cop that pulled me over because "I flashed my lights at him"- Umm No! i did not flash my lights at you PIG!- the xB's suspension is very stiff- driving over minor bumps downtown will give that effect- I tried explaining that to him- but he kept asking q's about my box...
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #10  
TOAST3R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 661
From: Sheboygan, WI
Default

well that was useless, the dmv doesnt do either, they sent me to emissions. emissions doesnt do it either. so i called the state patrol, they can check the windows but they dont have a meter for exhaust. and lady on phone tried telling me if it didnt come with car its illegal
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #11  
Munch's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,426
Default

Originally Posted by TOAST3R
well that was useless, the dmv doesnt do either, they sent me to emissions. emissions doesnt do it either. so i called the state patrol, they can check the windows but they dont have a meter for exhaust. and lady on phone tried telling me if it didnt come with car its illegal
I've heard that one too. If the exhaust isn't factory it's illegal.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 05:32 PM
  #12  
TOAST3R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 661
From: Sheboygan, WI
Default

i tried looking at wisconsin laws to find whats allowed and not, it just says anything that is louder than factory isnt allowed. its pretty vague. how are you suppose to judge if its above factory and hand a ticket out?

im going to email sema and see what they say.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #13  
xcanuc's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13
From: Woodstock, ON
Default

Did the cop have a decible meter? If not then you should beat that ticket. They have to prove the exhaust is too loud and if there is no decible reading then it is bull____.

As for the rear windows, have your dealer write you out something saying that the tint is stock from the factory and you should walk away free and clear on both.

$teve
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #14  
beioski's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 119
Default

Just wondering, how much was the ticket for the exhaust? I think in PA its not that much (under $50) and they dont even check to see if you changed the exhaust. I'm not sure though.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #15  
Spider13's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,881
From: Charlotte, NC (L.A.)
Default

Alot of states have very vague laws about exhaust. These laws are basically unenforcable. Most of the time as long as your not running straight pipes, they can't do much. Unless it like Ca. w/ the 90db rule.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #16  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

if the law states anything louder than stock i'm pretty sure whether the cop was a dick or not he's probably not so dumb as to not know what 90% of aftermarket exhaust look and sound like. just my 2 cents. and i can just about guarantee you will get screwed with the front tint.
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #17  
TOAST3R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 661
From: Sheboygan, WI
Default

i didnt get a ticket because he had no way of proving the tint was illegal and the exhaust i got a warning. it says the violation must be corrected at once. all future operations without corrections are illegal

i stopped at the window tint place we have here and they metered it for me, the sides came to 27% and the front was 18% i think. so they are both illegal. but he says sicne the rears are factory they cant ticket me for it. but the fronts they can. so ill wait until i get a actual ticket before doing anything.

i think the vehicle looks ugly with the fronts the way they come stock
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #18  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

27% blocking or 27% thru? so id assume its 30 then and you put 20 on the front? almost al;l states allow tint on the rears. but i may be wrong
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 07:49 PM
  #19  
TOAST3R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 661
From: Sheboygan, WI
Default

wisconsin law is 50% on fronts and 35% on sides and rear

http://www.iwfa.com/iwfa/Law_Chart/S...aw%20Chart.htm
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #20  
TOAST3R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 661
From: Sheboygan, WI
Default

i tried asking at scion.com
bob was useless

Bob: How may I help you today?
kirby: i was wondering what the tint percentage is on the windows of the scion xB
kirby: i got pulled over for factory tint last night
Bob: The windows are the only ones that are tinted.
Bob: From the factory.
kirby: yes but whats the percent of tint on those windows. how much light does it let through
Bob: I have to look that up, hang on...
Bob: The privacy glass in the xB side and rear windows are 91-95 % UV-cut
kirby: whats the percentage of light let through then?
kirby: still there?
Bob: The % is 91-95 % UV-cut



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23 PM.