The Truth About Cars - xB road test
#21
Originally Posted by Bigfieroman
The reviewer seems to have been a huge fan of the first xB, considering his glowing praise for it. What faults did he say it had…no CC and airbags? Everything else was great on the first gen? For real?
You keep harping on the "haters" when you're the one who sounds more and more like a gen 1 hater.
Go buy your xB2 already and enjoy it. But respect your elders and carry on tradition. If it wasn't for the overwhelming success of the xB1 there would be no new box for you to praise so much. People like me who purchased it back in 2003, despite all of the flaws you see in it, are the ones who made the Scion "box" popular.
-THE DON
#22
Originally Posted by scionofPCFL
sure not everyone will like it
what I don't get, is what happened to the love fest from the T2B show car? The design cues are all identical.
#23
Originally Posted by Bigfieroman
I have to hand it to you few remaining haters.
I happen to like the new ones, if only because my sister-in-law just got rear-ended by a Suburban in HER xB, and I'm trying to face the very real possibility that I might HAVE to purchase a B2 when some retarded soccer mom plows a minivan into my cLassic.
However...
Find me a SINGLE postive review of the B2 that doesn't also slam the cLassic. Call me crazy, but if some **** starts hating on the stuff I like most about the car, that's probably NOT the best person to tell me whether or not I'll like the new one. Maybe the rest of Camry-driving America gives a crap about that reviewer's opinion, but if you haven't noticed, we're a little different here.
The only positive review I've ever seen celebrated the removal of the "moronic dash-mounted instrument cluster." THAT 'MORONIC' INSTRUMENT CLUSTER IS THE REASON I BOUGHT THE CAR. So are you really surprised that people are disregarding "positive" reviews?
TTAC has never missed the mark in a car review, as long as I've been paying attention. Other "reviewers" seem like they're soliciting advertising or trying to sell cars - my favorite was the one what described the Jeep Patriot as a "capable off-road vehicle." TTAC is the only site I've ever seen that discusses what *I* would discuss if I was telling a friend about the car - here's what I really like, here's what ____es me off.
This is the first review I've ever seen from someone who also appears to have liked the original, sooo..yeah, that gets some credit.
#24
It's funny how some people act as if the xB1 flopped or was some kind of horrible car and these drastic changes were BADLY needed... I don't understand that part.
If it was such a gutless, tiny, tin can POS, why did they fly off dealer lots?
I agree, a slight facelift, new saftey features, and a 1.8 would have made the '08 perfect.
But once again, this is not a "redesigned xB", this is an all new, tC based wagon. The xB badge is simply an attempt to capitalize on the popularity of the gen 1. Case closed.
-THE DON
If it was such a gutless, tiny, tin can POS, why did they fly off dealer lots?
I agree, a slight facelift, new saftey features, and a 1.8 would have made the '08 perfect.
But once again, this is not a "redesigned xB", this is an all new, tC based wagon. The xB badge is simply an attempt to capitalize on the popularity of the gen 1. Case closed.
-THE DON
#25
Originally Posted by ZOMGXB
Find me a SINGLE postive review of the B2 that doesn't also slam the cLassic. Call me crazy, but if some **** starts hating on the stuff I like most about the car, that's probably NOT the best person to tell me whether or not I'll like the new one. Maybe the rest of Camry-driving America gives a crap about that reviewer's opinion, but if you haven't noticed, we're a little different here.
The only positive review I've ever seen celebrated the removal of the "moronic dash-mounted instrument cluster." THAT 'MORONIC' INSTRUMENT CLUSTER IS THE REASON I BOUGHT THE CAR. So are you really surprised that people are disregarding "positive" reviews?
TTAC has never missed the mark in a car review, as long as I've been paying attention. Other "reviewers" seem like they're soliciting advertising or trying to sell cars - my favorite was the one what described the Jeep Patriot as a "capable off-road vehicle." TTAC is the only site I've ever seen that discusses what *I* would discuss if I was telling a friend about the car - here's what I really like, here's what ____es me off.
This is the first review I've ever seen from someone who also appears to have liked the original, sooo..yeah, that gets some credit.
The only positive review I've ever seen celebrated the removal of the "moronic dash-mounted instrument cluster." THAT 'MORONIC' INSTRUMENT CLUSTER IS THE REASON I BOUGHT THE CAR. So are you really surprised that people are disregarding "positive" reviews?
TTAC has never missed the mark in a car review, as long as I've been paying attention. Other "reviewers" seem like they're soliciting advertising or trying to sell cars - my favorite was the one what described the Jeep Patriot as a "capable off-road vehicle." TTAC is the only site I've ever seen that discusses what *I* would discuss if I was telling a friend about the car - here's what I really like, here's what ____es me off.
This is the first review I've ever seen from someone who also appears to have liked the original, sooo..yeah, that gets some credit.
-THE DON
#26
my favorite TTAC momment was when Lexus (or was it BMW) banned them from using there press fleet because they called the grill on the Subaru Tribeca "the flying vagina"
#27
I hope you guys don't bash xB2 owners. Bash the car you want but not the drivers and owners. I'm waiting for EPA air pollution results. The xB1 pumps out more smog pollution than my V8 4Runner!
#30
Originally Posted by scionofPCFL
The xB1 pumps out more smog pollution than my V8 4Runner!
#31
Originally Posted by YourNameHere
i dont belive that for a second...the xB is more efficant car per mile out there.
#32
and all around Efficency is a totaly diff thing...ie: fuel + maintaince + cost of the car ect...there is arating of cost per mile...ill go find it
#33
Uhm, yeah I see what you were talking about, but there's still the slight difference in greenhouse emmisions, and what I mean by "slight", is twice as many in the 4runner.
BTW, for the record, the new B is a ULEVII vehicle.
BTW, for the record, the new B is a ULEVII vehicle.
#34
06 Scion xB
11 Barrels of Petroleum a year
5.9 Tons of Greenhouse gases
06 V8 4Runner
20.1 Barrels of Petroleum a year
10.6 Tons of Greenhouse gases
07 Porsche Turbo
17.1Barrels of Petroleum a year
9.1Tons of Greenhouse gases
some food for thought
11 Barrels of Petroleum a year
5.9 Tons of Greenhouse gases
06 V8 4Runner
20.1 Barrels of Petroleum a year
10.6 Tons of Greenhouse gases
07 Porsche Turbo
17.1Barrels of Petroleum a year
9.1Tons of Greenhouse gases
some food for thought
#35
TTAC reviews have always been like this.
I have read one or two that were good, but those were for a special breed of car.
I take they're reviews with a grain of salt. I like the new xB more than the old one. And I'm not "really" buying it for it's uniqueness. I want it because it is going to make for a decent people/crap carrier.
The good thing about this being more "baby boomer" friendly is that resale will remain great.
I have read one or two that were good, but those were for a special breed of car.
I take they're reviews with a grain of salt. I like the new xB more than the old one. And I'm not "really" buying it for it's uniqueness. I want it because it is going to make for a decent people/crap carrier.
The good thing about this being more "baby boomer" friendly is that resale will remain great.
#36
The only time I see people disagree with a TTCA review is when they own the car. Mostly because TTAC doesn’t sugarcoat things and almost every other magazine/website does. I have a hard time reading an xB2 review on Edmunds that has a Toyota ad running on the side. The reviews on TTAC are honest opinions that are not spoiled or influenced by advertiser’s money (IE: Ford Hiring Road & Track to do a comparo…who did you REALLY think was going to get the stamp of approval, and you didn’t hear ANY negative comments about the Ford did you?)
The xB has gained 650 pounds, a foot in length, and three inches in width.
-TRUE
EPA numbers are down almost 25 percent for the city cycle (’06 adjusted), from 28 to 22 mpg.-TRUE
The throne-like seating position has lost four inches of leg room. Headroom has also diminished. Ditto the back seat,-TRUE
Where the old thrones were nicely bolstered and contoured, with a nubby textural two-tone fabric, the new ones are molded blobs covered in a dreary monolithic black fabric.
-TRUE
The xB’s superb view– favored by many of its elderly patrons– has been cruelly reduced.-TRUE
The new XB is faster, but the fun (and challenge) is gone. The new-found heft and softer ride takes XB handling from MINI territory right to into Camry Land.-While it might not handle as well its deff FUN to toss around…a larger, softer car wouldn’t be
Though i do agree the interior has some nicer materials on the dash and i like the overhead storage
im not really sure what there is to argue about…obviously YOU liked the car which is why you bought one…so just enjoy it for what it is. i posted this review as an alternative to the normal sugarcaoted, car company ___ kissing reviews you read everywhere.
The xB has gained 650 pounds, a foot in length, and three inches in width.
-TRUE
EPA numbers are down almost 25 percent for the city cycle (’06 adjusted), from 28 to 22 mpg.-TRUE
The throne-like seating position has lost four inches of leg room. Headroom has also diminished. Ditto the back seat,-TRUE
Where the old thrones were nicely bolstered and contoured, with a nubby textural two-tone fabric, the new ones are molded blobs covered in a dreary monolithic black fabric.
-TRUE
The xB’s superb view– favored by many of its elderly patrons– has been cruelly reduced.-TRUE
The new XB is faster, but the fun (and challenge) is gone. The new-found heft and softer ride takes XB handling from MINI territory right to into Camry Land.-While it might not handle as well its deff FUN to toss around…a larger, softer car wouldn’t be
Though i do agree the interior has some nicer materials on the dash and i like the overhead storage
im not really sure what there is to argue about…obviously YOU liked the car which is why you bought one…so just enjoy it for what it is. i posted this review as an alternative to the normal sugarcaoted, car company ___ kissing reviews you read everywhere.
#37
Originally Posted by YourNameHere
The only time I see people disagree with a TTCA review is when they own the car. Mostly because TTAC doesn’t sugarcoat things and almost every other magazine/website does. I have a hard time reading an xB2 review on Edmunds that has a Toyota ad running on the side. The reviews on TTAC are honest opinions that are not spoiled or influenced by advertiser’s money (IE: Ford Hiring Road & Track to do a comparo…who did you REALLY think was going to get the stamp of approval, and you didn’t hear ANY negative comments about the Ford did you?)
The xB has gained 650 pounds, a foot in length, and three inches in width.
-TRUE
EPA numbers are down almost 25 percent for the city cycle (’06 adjusted), from 28 to 22 mpg.-TRUE Actually, FALSE.
The throne-like seating position has lost four inches of leg room. Headroom has also diminished. Ditto the back seat,-TRUE These numbers are up for debate, as most people have not experienced such a huge difference in space. Could be TRUE.
Where the old thrones were nicely bolstered and contoured, with a nubby textural two-tone fabric, the new ones are molded blobs covered in a dreary monolithic black fabric.
-TRUE Umm, no. I have ridden in both, and I found the new seats to be vastly more comfortable and expensive-looking guess it is an opinion thing.
The xB’s superb view– favored by many of its elderly patrons– has been cruelly reduced.-TRUE I agree.
The new XB is faster, but the fun (and challenge) is gone. The new-found heft and softer ride takes XB handling from MINI territory right to into Camry Land.-While it might not handle as well its deff FUN to toss around…a larger, softer car wouldn’t be
Though i do agree the interior has some nicer materials on the dash and i like the overhead storage
im not really sure what there is to argue about…obviously YOU liked the car which is why you bought one…so just enjoy it for what it is. i posted this review as an alternative to the normal sugarcaoted, car company butt kissing reviews you read everywhere.
The xB has gained 650 pounds, a foot in length, and three inches in width.
-TRUE
EPA numbers are down almost 25 percent for the city cycle (’06 adjusted), from 28 to 22 mpg.-TRUE Actually, FALSE.
The throne-like seating position has lost four inches of leg room. Headroom has also diminished. Ditto the back seat,-TRUE These numbers are up for debate, as most people have not experienced such a huge difference in space. Could be TRUE.
Where the old thrones were nicely bolstered and contoured, with a nubby textural two-tone fabric, the new ones are molded blobs covered in a dreary monolithic black fabric.
-TRUE Umm, no. I have ridden in both, and I found the new seats to be vastly more comfortable and expensive-looking guess it is an opinion thing.
The xB’s superb view– favored by many of its elderly patrons– has been cruelly reduced.-TRUE I agree.
The new XB is faster, but the fun (and challenge) is gone. The new-found heft and softer ride takes XB handling from MINI territory right to into Camry Land.-While it might not handle as well its deff FUN to toss around…a larger, softer car wouldn’t be
Though i do agree the interior has some nicer materials on the dash and i like the overhead storage
im not really sure what there is to argue about…obviously YOU liked the car which is why you bought one…so just enjoy it for what it is. i posted this review as an alternative to the normal sugarcaoted, car company butt kissing reviews you read everywhere.
#38
Where the old thrones were nicely bolstered and contoured, with a nubby textural two-tone fabric, the new ones are molded blobs covered in a dreary monolithic black fabric.
-TRUE
-TRUE
#39
Well, I'm sad to see the xB1 go for different reasons than most. I bought the xB1 specifically because of the large interior space and ceiling height. It was modified to accomidate a motorized wheelchair, where the passenger could sit upright in the chair in the back. With the redesign, this will not be possible, and disabled people looking for a fresh ride with good MPG and an AFFORDABLE price will be out of luck. (Funny thing, this company also mod's PT Cruizers for manual wheelchairs, guess they now have a second vehicle for that) I'm not sure what the company I purchased this from, or the Braun corporation, will be doing as they put in substantial development dollars to mod this on a large scale, only to have their donor vehicle dry up without a replacement. Well, they do still have an Element for motorized chairs, just hope my box doesn't need replacement.
#40
Originally Posted by scionofPCFL
Where the old thrones were nicely bolstered and contoured, with a nubby textural two-tone fabric, the new ones are molded blobs covered in a dreary monolithic black fabric.
-TRUE
-TRUE