xB2's Slow selling..
#62
Yeah, the close coupled short wheelbase on the iQ (the name a take off on "Smart") with rather limited travel is going to give a very choppy ride with lots of pitch motions in its ride.
In the city, at low speeds, that won't be much of a problem, but on the highway it could be brutal - but then it is not designed as a highway car.
The main seating is placed pretty close to geometric center, so the effects of the pitch and choppyness in the front seat passengers should be a low as possible, but there is just no getting around that it will have an "interesting" ride.
I'm not sure about the style folks will choose, but so far what I hear folks talking about is again huge wheels and paper thin tires. (That may change when they feel how it rides...)
Lots of folks liked the 5axis bodykit that was dragged around the country and shown in person to "a select few."
We'll just have to wait and see...
In the city, at low speeds, that won't be much of a problem, but on the highway it could be brutal - but then it is not designed as a highway car.
The main seating is placed pretty close to geometric center, so the effects of the pitch and choppyness in the front seat passengers should be a low as possible, but there is just no getting around that it will have an "interesting" ride.
I'm not sure about the style folks will choose, but so far what I hear folks talking about is again huge wheels and paper thin tires. (That may change when they feel how it rides...)
Lots of folks liked the 5axis bodykit that was dragged around the country and shown in person to "a select few."
We'll just have to wait and see...
#64
In reply I'll simply add that the xB2 was brought into the same healthy competitor free market that the xB left, and quite easily undersold the original, and that Scion marque sales have plummeted faster and farther than Toyota or Lexus...
That the xB2 NOW has competition does not affect it's initial sales as a brand new car, and the fall of Scion sales against Toyota sales does not reflect a difference in money values...
Again, the xB2 is a good car and a fine value for the money, it just didn't tap the zeitgeist in the way that the xB Classic did.
That the xB2 NOW has competition does not affect it's initial sales as a brand new car, and the fall of Scion sales against Toyota sales does not reflect a difference in money values...
Again, the xB2 is a good car and a fine value for the money, it just didn't tap the zeitgeist in the way that the xB Classic did.
#65
Senior Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,322
Hey, 808, where did you get that chart? Did you make? Big ups to you if you actually did the work and posted it up, that's awesome. . . but yeah. . . there are those of us not so heavily vested into defending the car, and we can read the numbers. . . there really is no point arguing about it since it will go on forever, no matter what data and numbers you provide.
What is REALLY interesting is that at their respective sales peaks, the xD did not sell as well as the xA. I really think the xA undersold due to lack of recognition. . . it was marketed very hard (unlike the Fit or Yaris), it wasn't well recognized, and to this day, most people have NO IDEA what kind of car it is. You can't exactly sell a car if NOBODY knows about it. Honestly, when I owned an xA, it got more attention than any other car I've had. . . my brother had a 911 GT3 I would borrow frequently and I got LESS looks and questions in the Porsche than the xA. The xB didn't exactly need the marketing. . . it was sooooo out there it was INSTANTLY recognizeable. And being that an equivalently equipped Yaris was more expensive than the xA (and its basically the same car), the Yaris sold like hotcakes, relative to the xA. Same car, better pricing, and worse sales leads me to think it was a strategy/marketing problem more than the car itself.
What is REALLY interesting is that at their respective sales peaks, the xD did not sell as well as the xA. I really think the xA undersold due to lack of recognition. . . it was marketed very hard (unlike the Fit or Yaris), it wasn't well recognized, and to this day, most people have NO IDEA what kind of car it is. You can't exactly sell a car if NOBODY knows about it. Honestly, when I owned an xA, it got more attention than any other car I've had. . . my brother had a 911 GT3 I would borrow frequently and I got LESS looks and questions in the Porsche than the xA. The xB didn't exactly need the marketing. . . it was sooooo out there it was INSTANTLY recognizeable. And being that an equivalently equipped Yaris was more expensive than the xA (and its basically the same car), the Yaris sold like hotcakes, relative to the xA. Same car, better pricing, and worse sales leads me to think it was a strategy/marketing problem more than the car itself.
#68
The 500 has been a hit in Europe, probably due to its cute look and the nostalgia it evokes, but I think Fiat engineering, build quality and reliability are nowhere near Toyota's - and never will be.
#69
Actually, Fiat engineering is not all that bad, but they tend to be lacking in the "extras" we have become accustomed to, and always tend to be a "World Car" no matter where they are sold rather than tweaked for each market. (And their electrics tend to be even worse than the British... )
(I've owned British, and all of 'em had electrics by Lucas. There was a reason the common saying was "Lucas, Lord of Darkness.")
In the US, the Italian and French cars have never really done all that well - they just seem "odd." German, Japanese, and now Korean have been better accepted. Heck, even the Swedes did better here. :o)
There are some excellent European brands out there, and some very interesting cars, but unless they can suddenly show up with a full blown dealer network and an endless supply of parts and mechanics, they can't expect to be a huge splash in the US.
I've had cars that if you left the town where you bought it you couldn't get it worked on and there were no parts. Let's face it, the last place you want to be stuck waiting 2 weeks for a part and hoping that the mechanic has the tools and knowledge to fix something is in the middle of nowhere on your vacation... (Last of my MGs that I sold actually had some John Deer parts in it from when I got it fixed while passing through Lamar, CO.)
(I've owned British, and all of 'em had electrics by Lucas. There was a reason the common saying was "Lucas, Lord of Darkness.")
In the US, the Italian and French cars have never really done all that well - they just seem "odd." German, Japanese, and now Korean have been better accepted. Heck, even the Swedes did better here. :o)
There are some excellent European brands out there, and some very interesting cars, but unless they can suddenly show up with a full blown dealer network and an endless supply of parts and mechanics, they can't expect to be a huge splash in the US.
I've had cars that if you left the town where you bought it you couldn't get it worked on and there were no parts. Let's face it, the last place you want to be stuck waiting 2 weeks for a part and hoping that the mechanic has the tools and knowledge to fix something is in the middle of nowhere on your vacation... (Last of my MGs that I sold actually had some John Deer parts in it from when I got it fixed while passing through Lamar, CO.)
#70
Actually, Fiat engineering is not all that bad, but they tend to be lacking in the "extras" we have become accustomed to, and always tend to be a "World Car" no matter where they are sold rather than tweaked for each market. (And their electrics tend to be even worse than the British... )
#71
I saw a Fiat over the summer here where i live. out of country plates. neat little car, but very chick for sure. hipster car if I could put a word on it. My wife belives the xA didn't sell well because of it's looks/layout. Cuz them things are everywhere you look in Japan even by todays standards.
#72
Senior Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,322
The Fiat 500 here in Asia has an interior quality level BETTER than a Mini, and better than even VW. It seriously feels like sitting in a nice italian hand bag or wallet. Real chrome, real leather, perfectly put together.
#73
The 500 does look good, particularly on the inside. Let's see how well it fares over several years in terms of reliability. Somehow I have my doubts about it, although anything is possible.
#74
I saw a Fiat over the summer here where i live. out of country plates. neat little car, but very chick for sure. hipster car if I could put a word on it. My wife belives the xA didn't sell well because of it's looks/layout. Cuz them things are everywhere you look in Japan even by todays standards.
#75
Hey, 808, where did you get that chart? Did you make? Big ups to you if you actually did the work and posted it up, that's awesome. . . but yeah. . . there are those of us not so heavily vested into defending the car, and we can read the numbers. . . there really is no point arguing about it since it will go on forever, no matter what data and numbers you provide.
What is REALLY interesting is that at their respective sales peaks, the xD did not sell as well as the xA. I really think the xA undersold due to lack of recognition. . . it was marketed very hard (unlike the Fit or Yaris), it wasn't well recognized, and to this day, most people have NO IDEA what kind of car it is. You can't exactly sell a car if NOBODY knows about it. Honestly, when I owned an xA, it got more attention than any other car I've had. . . my brother had a 911 GT3 I would borrow frequently and I got LESS looks and questions in the Porsche than the xA. The xB didn't exactly need the marketing. . . it was sooooo out there it was INSTANTLY recognizeable. And being that an equivalently equipped Yaris was more expensive than the xA (and its basically the same car), the Yaris sold like hotcakes, relative to the xA. Same car, better pricing, and worse sales leads me to think it was a strategy/marketing problem more than the car itself.
What is REALLY interesting is that at their respective sales peaks, the xD did not sell as well as the xA. I really think the xA undersold due to lack of recognition. . . it was marketed very hard (unlike the Fit or Yaris), it wasn't well recognized, and to this day, most people have NO IDEA what kind of car it is. You can't exactly sell a car if NOBODY knows about it. Honestly, when I owned an xA, it got more attention than any other car I've had. . . my brother had a 911 GT3 I would borrow frequently and I got LESS looks and questions in the Porsche than the xA. The xB didn't exactly need the marketing. . . it was sooooo out there it was INSTANTLY recognizeable. And being that an equivalently equipped Yaris was more expensive than the xA (and its basically the same car), the Yaris sold like hotcakes, relative to the xA. Same car, better pricing, and worse sales leads me to think it was a strategy/marketing problem more than the car itself.
#76
If you look at the very tail end of the chart, the recently released new tC model has caused a spike in sales for October 2010...but it still pales in comparison to when the xB2 came out.
#77
#78
A Canadian plate is nothing special, but a French one? And A Renault? That is simply amazing. I can't imagine who would want to bring a car into the US (and have the money to do it). It must have been for an auto show or some other kind of presentation, I am sure.
#79
people that move here for work can bring their car so long as it's LHD.
now back to topic. I was thinking. there is a mentality going on with Scion and the iQ. It would be a typical thought process and hear me out. I never really see people complain about how much a Smart fourtwo costs despite how small and slow it is. But it's intersting that everyone complains about how much an iQ costs ( less than a Smart) despite how small it is....catch my drift? I guess we really shouldn't worry about it's price honestly.
now back to topic. I was thinking. there is a mentality going on with Scion and the iQ. It would be a typical thought process and hear me out. I never really see people complain about how much a Smart fourtwo costs despite how small and slow it is. But it's intersting that everyone complains about how much an iQ costs ( less than a Smart) despite how small it is....catch my drift? I guess we really shouldn't worry about it's price honestly.
#80
Senior Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,322
And that's exactly why the Smart Cars don't fly off the shelves... You don't hear many complaints on the smart for the same reason you don't hear complaints about Ssangyong of Korea... Nobody owns one or cares enough tonmake a fuss. With the Scion, there is/was a massive fan base.