Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

Well, I was wrong about octane.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #1  
Old_Punk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 498
From: Charlotte, NC
Default Well, I was wrong about octane.

Count me among those who thought it was stupid using higher octane gas than the manufacturer suggested. I was wrong. I thought the engine management computer would reach some spark advance limit before you'd get any benefits, but, to quote Wilson:

"Modern electronics is good enough that automakers are now writing engine-management software to 'follow the knock sensor.' That is, the ignition timing, which is already being adjusted by the engine-management computer many times per second, is largely determined from what the knock sensor is commanding... Everything else being equal, the higher the fuel octane, the more ignition timing can be run before knock occurs, and thus more power is made."
Old May 12, 2005 | 11:36 PM
  #2  
Sciond's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One

SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,929
From: What's in your Box...
Default

and is there testing to verify this.....
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:59 AM
  #3  
Tomas's Avatar
Admin Emeritus

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,570
From: University Place, WA
Default

I know that some engines I had in the past with individual knock sensors per cylinder did this, and the results were obvious in the performance, but I have seen nothing to indicate that the Scions are set up this way.

Be nice if they were...
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:03 AM
  #4  
mfbenson's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 684
From: Somewhere, USA
Default

Who is Wilson? Tim Taylor's neighbor?

If there was a benefit, it would be seen in the time slips in the quarter-mile. Hasn't happened, nitro-breath.
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:09 AM
  #5  
SuperCrunchyAction's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 546
Default

Dead horse, meet stick.
Old May 13, 2005 | 04:24 AM
  #6  
skitsoKID911's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 123
From: Dallas, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by mfbenson
Who is Wilson? Tim Taylor's neighbor?

that made me laugh so hard you have no idea. yeah whos wilson?
Old May 13, 2005 | 04:30 AM
  #7  
gslippy's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 134
Default a "hallelujah" moment

https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=59642
Old May 13, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #8  
Old_Punk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 498
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by mfbenson
Who is Wilson? Tim Taylor's neighbor?

If there was a benefit, it would be seen in the time slips in the quarter-mile. Hasn't happened, nitro-breath.
Ah, sorry, I had edited the post and accidently left out the part that that identifies "Wilson" as Tom Wilson, technical editor at Road & Track.
Old May 13, 2005 | 01:56 PM
  #9  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

I'd like to see a test that verified this. . . there was a test by Motortrend (in 1999, I think) that tested this theory, and many cars LOST performance (although it was negligible) as a result. They concluded that it was best to stick to the manufacturer's recommendation.
Old May 13, 2005 | 01:56 PM
  #10  
Joehnn's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 882
From: Rolling Meadows, IL
Default

Originally Posted by SuperCrunchyAction
Dead horse, meet stick.
The topic that will not die.

I have an xB.
I only use 87 octane.
I like getting good mileage and using the cheapest gas.
Anyone else can do what they want.
Old May 13, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #11  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

yeah. . . I don't think the point is to change what people think. . . I know that I, personally, would LOVE to see some conrcrete evidence, either way, as it would be something cool to know.
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #12  
Joehnn's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 882
From: Rolling Meadows, IL
Default

Originally Posted by djct_watt
yeah. . . I don't think the point is to change what people think. . . I know that I, personally, would LOVE to see some conrcrete evidence, either way, as it would be something cool to know.
Yes, and if it makes a difference, how much. You also would need to run the test many times to make sure there was a statistically significant difference.
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #13  
IBJanky's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 208
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Joehnn
The topic that will not die.

I have an xB.
I only use 87 octane.
I like getting good mileage and using the cheapest gas.
Anyone else can do what they want.
You hit the nail right on the head.
Old May 13, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #14  
jaewon223's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 379
Default

um, that quote is entirely taken out of context. if you read that article further it goes on to say to use the octane recommended by the manufacturer. this octane topic has been discussed to death.
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #15  
tcperconti's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 147
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Default

The funny thing, the previous discussion on this topic helped convince me to use the basic octane rating suggested by the manufacturer. I haven't experienced any difference in performance and actually, a slight increase in gas mileage.
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #16  
grizzly_choppers's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

Scikotics
SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,235
From: Wilson Scion (IA)
Default

Originally Posted by Tomas
I know that some engines I had in the past with individual knock sensors per cylinder did this, and the results were obvious in the performance, but I have seen nothing to indicate that the Scions are set up this way.

Be nice if they were...
Just checked, only one knock sensor in every Scion.

Sorry!

-Alex
Old May 13, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #17  
ikhonlord's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,218
From: The Moderator Castle
Default

I agree...this topic has been discussed plenty of times. I know you are letting everyone know that YOU have seen the light, but there is really no point to make a post about it. If anyone wants more information about this discussion please follow the below link:

https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=59642
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steeze69
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power
1
May 24, 2021 02:57 AM
BlingSlade
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
5
Nov 20, 2015 06:56 PM
Klunkerbill
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
5
Nov 9, 2015 11:39 PM
Pkdust
Scion tC 2G Drivetrain & Power
17
Oct 20, 2015 04:27 PM
vi3tb0i09
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
2
Sep 23, 2015 08:32 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 PM.