Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Injen Short Ram Noise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 02:02 AM
  #1  
baysurfer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35
Default Injen Short Ram Noise

I have an Injen CAI that I'm thinking of converting to a short ram. Does anyone know how much (if any) the noise from the SRI will be compared to the CAI? Right now I don't really hear the CAI when I'm driving at steady RPMs, only when I push the RPMs higher.

Are there any other things I should be concerned about when changing to an SRI? I think I read somewhere that the battery needs to be pulled to reset one of sensors?
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 03:36 AM
  #2  
TeeCizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,862
From: Lurking Inside Your Garage!
Default

No battery pull neccessary..I have my Injen in Short Ram mode...No different noises....
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 03:40 AM
  #3  
Spect2K3's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,201
From: Norwalk, CT
Default

I've heard/read that short rams are supposed to be much louder than a full cai. The cai draws air from the wheel well while the sri draws air from in the engine bay. The air being drawn in should be more audible
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 03:44 AM
  #4  
Tcguy85's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,434
From: Hyde Park, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Spect2K3
I've heard/read that short rams are supposed to be much louder than a full cai. The cai draws air from the wheel well while the sri draws air from in the engine bay. The air being drawn in should be more audible
I'm gonna try mine as a short ram first but heat wrapped up until the maf sensor. if i don't like it like that i'll switch it to the CAI mode.

and i have heard the same thing about the short ram being quite a bit louder. anybody have actual results on this?
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 03:54 AM
  #5  
captainlaziness's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,213
From: Team Sharpie
Default

Originally Posted by Tcguy85
I'm gonna try mine as a short ram first but heat wrapped up until the maf sensor. if i don't like it like that i'll switch it to the CAI mode.

and i have heard the same thing about the short ram being quite a bit louder. anybody have actual results on this?
Heat wrap is pretty pointless when you're drawing hot air from the engine bay.
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 03:55 AM
  #6  
sddykstr's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 949
Default

^+1
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 03:59 AM
  #7  
Scionizer07's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 328
From: Southeast PA
Default

CAI > SRI

The colder the air the more dense it is, therefore more molecules of o2 per intake therefore more power can conceivably be made.
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 04:00 AM
  #8  
Tcguy85's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,434
From: Hyde Park, NY
Default

it keeps the piping cool. there have been a few people on here that have tried it and haven't regretted it. didn't have any dyno proven gains though.

are you guys saying that you think the heatwrap would have a better effect when the intake is a CAI not a short ram?
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 04:04 AM
  #9  
Tcguy85's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,434
From: Hyde Park, NY
Default

i can see on a dyno having extreme heatsoak and having alot of hot air getting sucked in when it's a short ram but when your actually moving the air is moving around so it can't be that hot.
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 07:06 AM
  #10  
captainlaziness's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,213
From: Team Sharpie
Default

Originally Posted by Tcguy85
it keeps the piping cool. there have been a few people on here that have tried it and haven't regretted it. didn't have any dyno proven gains though.

are you guys saying that you think the heatwrap would have a better effect when the intake is a CAI not a short ram?
Yes, I think it would be slightly more effective on a CAI but still won't be that much of an effect.


Originally Posted by Tcguy85
i can see on a dyno having extreme heatsoak and having alot of hot air getting sucked in when it's a short ram but when your actually moving the air is moving around so it can't be that hot.
True, but I bet it's still warmer than the air from down by the wheel well. Hot air goes up, cold air goes down. The main advantage of a SRI is that it doesn't have the slight risk of hydrolocking your engine that a CAI does.
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #11  
richardsayzz's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 142
Default

i started my injen in SRI and it is MUCH louder than CAI mode. but i think the CAI pulls a little harder because the A/F ratio is better..not sure?

my car seems to be eating gas a lot more ever since i installed the intake.. =( and i'm driving normal now
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 08:11 PM
  #12  
baysurfer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35
Default

I've actually noticed better gas mileage with the CAI installed.

So there isn't any definitive word as to whether the SRI is louder than the CAI? I'd like to think that the noise from the engine bay will drown out any noises coming from the SRI...
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #13  
Tito_Cruz's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 761
From: Coke-a-Cola, SC
Default

Originally Posted by captainlaziness
The main advantage of a SRI is that it doesn't have the slight risk of hydrolocking your engine that a CAI does.
I was worried about hydrolocking since the first day I installed the CAI. Last week, I ran through a HUGE puddle! It must've been a foot deep. Water flew everywhere, it even cleaned my windshield a little. I was soooo scared that it would suck up some water but I immediately let off the gas...finished going through and YAY! No locking here.
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 11:47 PM
  #14  
captainlaziness's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,213
From: Team Sharpie
Default

Originally Posted by Tito_Cruz
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
The main advantage of a SRI is that it doesn't have the slight risk of hydrolocking your engine that a CAI does.
I was worried about hydrolocking since the first day I installed the CAI. Last week, I ran through a HUGE puddle! It must've been a foot deep. Water flew everywhere, it even cleaned my windshield a little. I was soooo scared that it would suck up some water but I immediately let off the gas...finished going through and YAY! No locking here.
I've had my K&N on for more than two years without any problems. I do try to avoid large puddles if possible. Hydrolocking is a small, small, small, but real risk.
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 12:23 AM
  #15  
RoswellScion's Avatar
Former Sponsor
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 973
From: Roswell Scion (NM)
Default

The noise takes a slightly different tone when its SRI rather than CAI. It isn't much louder if at all. It is just a different tone.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
8URAWD
Scion tC 2G Owners Lounge
21
May 2, 2018 02:22 PM
ColonelSanders85
PPC: Vehicles
3
Nov 24, 2015 06:18 PM
slowcelica
PPC: Wanted
0
Feb 10, 2015 02:32 PM
OC_Scion
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
1
Feb 23, 2004 04:40 AM
Exclusive
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
35
Jan 27, 2004 10:53 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 PM.