Notices
Off-topic Cafe Meet the others and talk about whatever...
View Poll Results: What would you pick?
RSX Type-S
55.81%
tC
44.19%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

*RSX-S or tC*

Old Dec 21, 2006 | 01:54 AM
  #1  
Yanki01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,776
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default *RSX-S or tC*

Just wanted to see who would pick what? Im more that possitive that most of the votes will go the tC way (odviously)!


IMO, i would go with the type-s becuase i really like the design exterior and interior. Engine wise its pretty good? I would NOT JDM the typs-s at all! Keep it clean and fresh.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:14 AM
  #2  
captainlaziness's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,213
From: Team Sharpie
Default

I voted tC. Yes I am biased. No, I haven't driven an RSX.
I just love my tC.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:20 AM
  #3  
Yanki01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,776
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default

oh yea, i was doing this because of all the RSX owners talking crap about us tC owners.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:21 AM
  #4  
captainlaziness's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,213
From: Team Sharpie
Default

That's what I figured.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:22 AM
  #5  
captainlaziness's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,213
From: Team Sharpie
Default

Now if I had some track time in a Type-S, my answer may very well change. But as it is, I can't really see myself in one.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:30 AM
  #6  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

the rsx-s was my first choice when I was searching for a car but when I drove the tc and saw how much more I get bone stock, and all the while save money I went scion. besides I, from what I drove on it, cant tell a huge difference between the two.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 03:53 AM
  #7  
cfusionpm's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 572
From: San Diego, CA
Default

if you can afford it, the rsx-s is a better car for the most part. i would easilly pick a tC over a standard rsx (which i did), but against the type-s, i'd have to pick the acura.

throwing a wrench into the equasion, the 06+ Si is also very good, and now comes in stylish and practical 4-door trim. i'm personally very tempted to trade my tC for a Si sedan.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 04:57 AM
  #8  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

I hate honduh's but i'd pick teh rsx-s all day any day.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 05:17 AM
  #9  
TxtC112's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 225
From: TX
Default

I picked the tC because the tC has more room then the RSX. Now if you put the Integra in this i would have choosen a GSR integra over both the tC and the RSX-S. I just love the look of the Integra.

I've also lately have thought about trading in the tC for the new SI seden.

But honestly not having to buy premium fuel is great
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 08:38 AM
  #10  
Superinc_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 160
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

RSX-S > tC

RSX < tC


if I had to get a N/A 4 banger it would be the RSXS, (yes even over a S2000)
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #11  
scion_jon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,841
From: In The Fast Lane
Default

tc
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 09:14 AM
  #12  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

s2k is a crappy car.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #13  
s0opa_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 389
From: Dal-Worth
Default

RSX-S any day i mean come on i-VTEC...
i rather get an 01' Intergra type R keepin it ol' school
take out an Type-s and tC anyday....

i was thinking about trading in my tC for a rsx-S but i already modded the the damn thing...too lazy to take out mod parts and put the stockies back in. plus coilovers are a pain to take out by your self.....
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #14  
cfusionpm's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 572
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by hotbox05
s2k is a crappy car.
you ever driven one? i would take a s2000 in a HEARTBEAT if i could afford one. its an amazing machine, not even close to our little fwd econo-coupes. a friend of mine owns one, and ive test driven an 04 and an 06. i would absolutely love to own one.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #15  
hunterUnknown's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,478
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

s2k is awesome. in every way.

but anyway, as it was said before, if you have the money, go for rsx-s. if not, tc.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #16  
captainlaziness's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,213
From: Team Sharpie
Default

Originally Posted by hunterUnknown
s2k is awesome. in every way.

but anyway, as it was said before, if you have the money, go for rsx-s. if not, tc.
...even interior room?
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #17  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

Originally Posted by cfusionpm
Originally Posted by hotbox05
s2k is a crappy car.
you ever driven one? i would take a s2000 in a HEARTBEAT if i could afford one. its an amazing machine, not even close to our little fwd econo-coupes. a friend of mine owns one, and ive test driven an 04 and an 06. i would absolutely love to own one.
yeah i've driven one for a 2 week period of time.

I don;t like much if anything about it. i kinda like it's fish face appearance. but room , comfort , driving position , interior , sucked.


it wasn;t fast enough , and i wasn't going out to drift in a car that wasnt mine but needless to say it's fairly easy to step the tail out. but stock nowhere near fun to try and control that.

yeah no duh different than our fwd "econo cars"

so was my supra , so was my old bmw , so is a vw bug.

cars can be totally different than each other but still be buttloads of fun for different reasons . some garner my love fast or slow , ugly or good looking.

i can even say i love a minute few fwd cars.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #18  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

Originally Posted by captainlaziness
Originally Posted by hunterUnknown
s2k is awesome. in every way.

but anyway, as it was said before, if you have the money, go for rsx-s. if not, tc.
...even interior room?
"sick burn"
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #19  
cfusionpm's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 572
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by hotbox05
Originally Posted by cfusionpm
Originally Posted by hotbox05
s2k is a crappy car.
you ever driven one? i would take a s2000 in a HEARTBEAT if i could afford one. its an amazing machine, not even close to our little fwd econo-coupes. a friend of mine owns one, and ive test driven an 04 and an 06. i would absolutely love to own one.
yeah i've driven one for a 2 week period of time.

I don;t like much if anything about it. i kinda like it's fish face appearance. but room , comfort , driving position , interior , sucked.


it wasn;t fast enough , and i wasn't going out to drift in a car that wasnt mine but needless to say it's fairly easy to step the tail out. but stock nowhere near fun to try and control that.
well, i'm 5'6", so comfort and driving position fit me nicely. and i personally love the looks inside and out, so thats just a difference of opinion. i totally concede storeage space and back seats, but thats pretty much it.

though, its not a car meant to be drifted in the first place. if anything, its designed perfectly for small course and auto-x racing ideally. its a car that rewards a skilled driver and is unforgiving to an unskilled one.

difference in opinions aside, it is far from a "crappy" car.
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

yeah no i pretty mcuh hated everything about it. i;ve always hated vtec.......

and putting that in a bigger heavier car makes me hate it more.

i'm not that big but 5'10 and i'm totally cramped. anything more than 15 minutes and it was torture. and no i;m not fat either. well a tiny bit . at about 180.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 PM.