Notices
Off-topic Cafe Meet the others and talk about whatever...

amd vs intel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #21  
Peteypabs88's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
DelMarVa
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 88
From: Centreville, Va
Default

I personally like Intel more because I haven't really had good experiences with AMD, it all depends on your budget right now, if you can id spring for a core duo or if you can afford it a core 2 duo as those blow any AMD product out of the water. Plus with core 2 duo you'll be able to take advantage of 64 bit programming which at the time there isnt much, but in the future more and more programs will be available
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #22  
farberio's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 586
From: Naperville/Geneva IL
Default

Originally Posted by bronxblaza117
^ i dont think so, they just give em numbers, people like to assume that they name then as to how fast it would be compared to a pentium but not true...never ever heard of a working clock speed and real clock speed... it just has a speed period, but u can overclock it if u want usually
Since AMDs do more work then Intels per tick they run slower but accomplish the same or more amount of work.
I was taught this in school, this also explains the difference.

http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/20...1215033811.htm
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 03:42 PM
  #23  
bronxblaza117's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
tC squad
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 667
From: Bronx, NY
Default

yea thats true but it is still not equivalent to a 4.2ghz P4... amd's are known to be really good for gaming but for multitasking intel has hyperthreading which is great
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #24  
farberio's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 586
From: Naperville/Geneva IL
Default

Originally Posted by bronxblaza117
yea thats true but it is still not equivalent to a 4.2ghz P4... amd's are known to be really good for gaming but for multitasking intel has hyperthreading which is great
An Athlon 64 4200 is equivalent to a 4.2 ghz Intel as proved above.
Yes, Intel is good for multitasking with HT, but with the evolution of dual core Hyperthreading was dropped. It's only in P4's that say it on the box.

With dual core you have essentually two PC's so multi-tasking can be handled much easier.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #25  
Skeorx13's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 988
From: NW Chicago
Default

Actually the Dual cores do have hyperthreading. I have the Pentium D 830. Runs about as fast as my old P4 2.66GHz but I can run way more stuff at the same time. Runs hotter than a witch's tit though so I had to get a watercooling kit.

Intel is better for longterm stability and not really that fantastic for overclockers. AMD is great for overclockers cuz you can get way more potential out of a much cheaper processor vs. intel. And for most overclockers, after a year or so, they look for a new chip out of performance concerns so the shorter lifespan involved in overclocking is moot for them.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #26  
farberio's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 586
From: Naperville/Geneva IL
Default

While I dont like to think of Wikipedia as a trusted souce...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_D

Hyper-Threading was used to multi task, with dual cores you can multitask with two different cpu's. Therefore hyperthreading was dropped.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #27  
farberio's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 586
From: Naperville/Geneva IL
Default

As far as the new Core 2 Duo's.

http://www.mcadonline.com/index.php?...=284&Itemid=73

Search for Hyperthreading and you will see that its not there!
However, if you look at the box on the right hand side they appear to be releaseing it for XEON 5000. That and they may use HT on later Core Duo chips to boost the performance even more.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 07:47 PM
  #28  
duston831's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 479
From: New Ibiera, LA
Default

ok so when it comes down to it, it seems likes its just a preference, both are pretty good. I usually dont do more than 2 things at a time so would il be better off getting an amd instead of a pentium with hyperthreading or dual core?
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 08:11 PM
  #29  
farberio's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 586
From: Naperville/Geneva IL
Default

Hehe, I think you should know by now not to ask that question, because Intel vs AMD never ends.

Basically, it doesnt matter. Find a good mobo/cpu deal and buy it with goodies like 2gb's ram. And make sure the mobo has PCI express for a sweet video card.

Although I would go for one of Intel or Amd's 2 Core CPUs because 2 cpus are better then one.

If your not looking at buying it tonight or so I would wait for a good deal on www.fatwallet.com\c\18 or www.slickdeals.net altough usually its a deal on a full PC that you would have to upgrade a bit.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #30  
MJVsTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,840
From: Central PA
Default

I couldn't be happier with my Macbook Pro's Intels.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 10:18 PM
  #31  
bronxblaza117's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
tC squad
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 667
From: Bronx, NY
Default

^farberio x2!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
willlangford
PPC: Misc and Lots
3
Sep 21, 2009 11:16 PM
Poison
Off-topic Cafe
12
Jan 6, 2006 04:07 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 PM.