Notices
Off-topic Cafe Meet the others and talk about whatever...

Cameras

Old Nov 13, 2006 | 11:05 PM
  #1  
Big_Bird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,401
From: North NJ / PSU
Default Cameras

Hey all, I am a purely ameteur photographer and i really want to get more into it, with a better camera. Thing is I dont know what to look for because I am such a noob. I dont have a lot of money so it would have to be around $400, that seems a price I could afford.
i want to get sharper quality than i have now, which isnt to much

thanks for any and all help


here are some of my pics as of now.
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...935&highlight=
http://www.teamscionrg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4375






I want to be able to capture this type of sharpness:
courtesy of "iwantajdmgrl" hope you dont mind

Old Nov 14, 2006 | 03:46 AM
  #2  
Big_Bird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,401
From: North NJ / PSU
Default

ayone can offer some assistance?
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 06:32 PM
  #3  
XB_BOB's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 153
From: Frederick MD
Default

i'm even more amatuer than most but, i think its a really high resolution camera with a longer exposure setting. But on the other hand it only caught one light on the stop light.

Im really interested too.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #4  
XxTamTxX's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,276
From: Mass.
Default

did you try PMing that member?
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #5  
Gonzo_xb's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 210
From: Baltimore, Md
Default

The kind of camera that the pros use is a D-SLR or Digital - Single Lens Reflex camera. That is just a fancy way of saying that you are looking at your picture directly through the lens instead of through a seperate viewfinder. Unfortunately, these are very expensive. At least $1000 and lenses cost extra.

For your needs, a mdeium to high end point and shoot camera should be fine. To get the nice sharp detail, you want a camera that is at least 7 megapixels. The newer cameras go up to 10 and some pro models go all the way up to 16! Unfortunately $400 will buy you a decent camera, but not a great one. However how you use the camera is almost as important as the quality of the camera. I suggest checking out some photgraphy forums and read up on it a bit.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #6  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

Don't get all caught up in the megapixel myth. Things like sensor size, camera build quality, and (most importantly) photographer skill level are all WAY more important than how many megapixels a camera has. As a matter of fact, when camera makers keep cramming more pixels on the same size image sensor, they are also incresing image noise.
As for what camera would be good for YOU; that depends entirely on what you will be using it for. What types of photos do you want to take with it?
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:03 PM
  #7  
Neothin's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,514
From: Orlando, FL (UCF)
Default

Canon s2.

it's what won me a spot in the calendar contest.

https://www.scionlife.com/calendar/2007/neothin_02.jpg

for nighttime photography, it has similar sharpness to my friends 1200 dollar canon 20d (note, a tripod IS MOST DEFINITELY needed for goo night shots). during the day it has some issues in bright sunlight, but it gets the job done... especially with that image stabilization system it has helping out.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #8  
greg_jspec's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 631
Default

NIKON D200 WHAAAT WHAAAT!
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #9  
XxTamTxX's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,276
From: Mass.
Default

lots of reg. cameras, (5mp plus) if you set it right, can turn out really good. all about knowing your options and setting it it up right. when you understand it all, get the fancy camera. Like take the time stamp off.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:22 PM
  #10  
Skeorx13's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 988
From: NW Chicago
Default

yeah that d200 is ridiculous.

But if you really are looking into a better camera, you're gonna need to drop at least $700, but more like around $1600 for a good digital. I don't know much about film camera pricing though... Photography is not something for the faint of heart or wallet. It takes a lot of practice, patience, and money.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #11  
Gonzo_xb's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 210
From: Baltimore, Md
Default

Originally Posted by matt_a
Don't get all caught up in the megapixel myth. Things like sensor size, camera build quality, and (most importantly) photographer skill level are all WAY more important than how many megapixels a camera has. As a matter of fact, when camera makers keep cramming more pixels on the same size image sensor, they are also incresing image noise.
As for what camera would be good for YOU; that depends entirely on what you will be using it for. What types of photos do you want to take with it?
Call it a myth if you like, but I own both a 5 and an 8 megapixel camera, with similar sensors, and the 8 megapixel images are vastly superior. And both are simple point and shoot cameras. Aside from image quality, more megapixels afford you more room to crop your image without too much image degredation.The bottom line is you get what you pay for. And like you said, the most expensive camera in the world will not improve your photography skills.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #12  
equinox2355's Avatar
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,346
From: Fremont, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Gonzo_xb
The kind of camera that the pros use is a D-SLR or Digital - Single Lens Reflex camera. That is just a fancy way of saying that you are looking at your picture directly through the lens instead of through a seperate viewfinder. Unfortunately, these are very expensive. At least $1000 and lenses cost extra.
Im going to have to disagree with that, the camera im looking at is a canon rebel xti >>click me<<

retail is $799, but ive seen it as cheap as $569 online and when Ive seen it in best buy, it comes with a Canon 18-55mm EF-S Lens for the $799 price.

Now dont get me wrong, I know its above his $400 price range, but I think that it would be better to save up and get this quality camera even though its more. It also has been getting excellent reviews...

just my $0.02
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #13  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

You won't have to spend as much as some people on here are telling you. If you're not interested in getting a DSLR, than I would recommend the Fuji 6000FD. After rebate, it's $333 from Buydig.com. It's an excellent camera for the money and gives you enough flexability to keep you happy for a long time.

If you are interested in making the big jump to DSLR, just keep in mind that the price of the camera is only the beginning. Most will come with a decent "kit lens" that will be fine for most basic shots, but you will soon be spending much more on other lenses, filters, flashes, bags, tripods...the list goes on and on. The advantage is in the cameras capability. I have a Pentax K100D DSLR and I LOVE it. You can buy it new with a lens for around $550 right now. You need to view a DSLR as a system, not a once-and-done purchase.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #14  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Gonzo_xb
Call it a myth if you like, but I own both a 5 and an 8 megapixel camera, with similar sensors, and the 8 megapixel images are vastly superior. And both are simple point and shoot cameras. Aside from image quality, more megapixels afford you more room to crop your image without too much image degredation.The bottom line is you get what you pay for. And like you said, the most expensive camera in the world will not improve your photography skills.
I'm not saying a higher res camera wont make a difference. I'm just saying that megapixels alone won't guarantee a great photo. I can show you images from a 6MP DSLR that will blow away most pics from a 10MP point-n-shoot digicam. Especially when you get up in the higher ISO ranges (like 1600 and above).
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #15  
iheartzombies's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,307
From: Dirty South
Default

I Have a Sony DSC-H2. It cost me around $500.

Here are some samples.









Photoshop plays a big part in how well your pictures can look.

Im looking to get a Nikon D50 soon though, gotta save up!
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #16  
Gonzo_xb's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 210
From: Baltimore, Md
Default

Originally Posted by equinox2355
Originally Posted by Gonzo_xb
The kind of camera that the pros use is a D-SLR or Digital - Single Lens Reflex camera. That is just a fancy way of saying that you are looking at your picture directly through the lens instead of through a seperate viewfinder. Unfortunately, these are very expensive. At least $1000 and lenses cost extra.
Im going to have to disagree with that, the camera im looking at is a canon rebel xti >>click me<<

retail is $799, but ive seen it as cheap as $569 online and when Ive seen it in best buy, it comes with a Canon 18-55mm EF-S Lens for the $799 price.

Now dont get me wrong, I know its above his $400 price range, but I think that it would be better to save up and get this quality camera even though its more. It also has been getting excellent reviews...

just my $0.02
Agreed. The canon is a great entry level dslr. I am currently saving up to get a Nikon d80 which is in the same league as the canon but has been getting slightly better reviews. The downside being that it is around $200 more expensive. The upside for me being that I already own a nikon flash that will work with the d80.

I guess the point I was trying to make is that DSLRs are expensive. That price of $569 for the canon was probably for the body only. I wasn't suggesting that the original poster should get one either. He asked what kind of camera takes the really nice shots so I was just answering that question.

So Big Bird, it's not that hard to research cameras. Just go online to get an idea of which cameras fall in your price range and then go to a site like www.cnet.com and do a search for reviews on those cameras. Should tell you all you need to know. Here is a great link. Not sure when this article was written though so it might be alittle outdated....
http://cameras.about.com/od/choosing...a/tp/price.htm
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #17  
Gonzo_xb's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 210
From: Baltimore, Md
Default

Originally Posted by matt_a
Originally Posted by Gonzo_xb
Call it a myth if you like, but I own both a 5 and an 8 megapixel camera, with similar sensors, and the 8 megapixel images are vastly superior. And both are simple point and shoot cameras. Aside from image quality, more megapixels afford you more room to crop your image without too much image degredation.The bottom line is you get what you pay for. And like you said, the most expensive camera in the world will not improve your photography skills.
I'm not saying a higher res camera wont make a difference. I'm just saying that megapixels alone won't guarantee a great photo. I can show you images from a 6MP DSLR that will blow away most pics from a 10MP point-n-shoot digicam. Especially when you get up in the higher ISO ranges (like 1600 and above).

Agreed. you can't go wrong with a dslr, you just have to shell out the cash. My comparison did not include a dslr. My point is that all things being equal, more is better.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #18  
equinox2355's Avatar
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,346
From: Fremont, CA
Default

I agree with Gonzo on the whole price issue, I just was wanting to point out how there were more affordable DSLRs out there.... and personally I goto http://www.dpreview.com/ for reviews from people that use the cameras, but www.cnet.com is a good choice as well
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 03:41 PM
  #19  
Big_Bird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,401
From: North NJ / PSU
Default

thanks guys, keep it coming,

i have been looking into this one, reviews seem good too
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...rToReadReviews
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #20  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Big_Bird
thanks guys, keep it coming,

i have been looking into this one, reviews seem good too
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...rToReadReviews
That's actually a very good camera and will probably suit your purposes quite well. If you want to save $15, get it from here:
http://www.beachcamera.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=CNPSS2
They are an EXCELLENT place to do business with.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XB06
Scion xB 2nd-Gen ICE & Interior
15
Oct 1, 2022 10:24 PM
alexdrummerr30
Scion xB 2nd-Gen ICE & Interior
7
Sep 8, 2018 12:18 PM
Viper
Scion xB 2nd-Gen ICE & Interior
8
Oct 30, 2016 11:19 AM
motomatt
Scion iQ Owner's Lounge
1
Aug 17, 2015 01:32 PM
BBesco2021
Scion tC 2G ICE & Interior
1
Aug 13, 2015 03:23 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 PM.