We Need to Ban Gasoline!!!
That’s it! I’m sick of this. I’ve lost track of how many people have been killed by Gasoline in the past year. It seems like at least once a week I read a news headline about some wingnut throwing gas on an ex-wife, girlfriend, homeless person, husband or coworker and then setting them on fire! There have been reports of people using gas to burn down entire apartment buildings (out of anger toward someone living there) and killing many innocent people inside. People have even made BOMBS quite easily from gasoline.
Now here’s the troubling part: Did you know that almost anyone can buy gasoline! I know that's hard to believe but I’m serious. There are almost no restrictions on this deadly weapon. You don’t need any type of permit and there is no waiting period. Hell, they don’t even do a background check! What type of country are we living in when anyone can obtain such a lethal weapon so easily? I say we either ban gasoline altogether, or we at least impose much stricter gas control laws.
Now here’s the troubling part: Did you know that almost anyone can buy gasoline! I know that's hard to believe but I’m serious. There are almost no restrictions on this deadly weapon. You don’t need any type of permit and there is no waiting period. Hell, they don’t even do a background check! What type of country are we living in when anyone can obtain such a lethal weapon so easily? I say we either ban gasoline altogether, or we at least impose much stricter gas control laws.
Originally Posted by oldmanatee
i'm with ya!!!
Remember, when staple guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have staple guns!
Remember, when staple guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have staple guns!
Originally Posted by citizen01
Haha... very funny
Gasoline functionality = transportation
kitchen knives functionality = cooking
baseball bats functionality = playing baseball
guns functionality = killing
Gasoline functionality = transportation
kitchen knives functionality = cooking
baseball bats functionality = playing baseball
guns functionality = killing
Originally Posted by citizen01
guns functionality = killing
Besides, with technology the way it is, we really don't need gasoline anymore. Sure, it had it's place back when our country was new and growing. But now we have plug-in electric cars and hydrogen fuel-cell cars. Gas engines are bad for the environment.
Gas has become an easily aquired, deadly weapon with the potential of doing damage on a massive scale.
Originally Posted by citizen01
I'm not going to argue this but killing is wrong, cooking and playing baseball are not.
Originally Posted by citizen01
I'd like to see you say that to the faces of the families of the students killed in virginia. I'm not going to argue this but killing is wrong, cooking and playing baseball are not.
Is that correct?
Originally Posted by HeathenBrewing
Originally Posted by citizen01
Haha... very funny
Gasoline functionality = transportation
kitchen knives functionality = cooking
baseball bats functionality = playing baseball
guns functionality = killing
Gasoline functionality = transportation
kitchen knives functionality = cooking
baseball bats functionality = playing baseball
guns functionality = killing
A comment like the one above is EXTREMELY incensitive considering this county's current climate as a result of the recent massacre. Leave it alone.
Do something productive like tuning into the hearing concerning attorney general Gonzalez.
Originally Posted by citizen01
...A comment like the one above is EXTREMELY incensitive considering this county's current climate as a result of the recent massacre. Leave it alone....
If anyone is insensitive and unaware of how to keep subjects seperate, it is you.
Originally Posted by matt_a
Originally Posted by tCTaco
Do I still get to fart
Originally Posted by citizen01
This is my last post because this topic has been discussed. You all know from the other thread that I am perfectly aware a ban on guns is not the answer. That said...
A comment like the one above is EXTREMELY incensitive considering this county's current climate as a result of the recent massacre. Leave it alone.
Do something productive like tuning into the hearing concerning attorney general Gonzalez.
And just what would that accomplish???? No one is gonna call me up and ask what I think they should do with Roberto.....
BTW, it's inSensitive....a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
So is a sense of humor.
Originally Posted by citizen01
Haha... very funny
Gasoline functionality = transportation
kitchen knives functionality = cooking
baseball bats functionality = playing baseball
guns functionality = killing
Gasoline functionality = transportation
kitchen knives functionality = cooking
baseball bats functionality = playing baseball
guns functionality = killing
Kitchen Knives -
Intended Purpose = cooking
Functionality = cutting (what you cut is up to you)
Baseball Bats -
Intended Purpose = playing baseball
Functionality = Hitting things (what you hit is up to you)
Whatever the intended purpose of a gun may be, it's functionality is shooting. What you choose to shoot is up to you.
Any of those items can be used for something innocent, or they can be used to kill. It's not up to the item. It's up to the person using it.
When guns were most available and virtually unregulated - when you could buy them without question the way you could buy a lawn mower, when you could buy them through the mail or from catalogs - there was less violent crime not more.
Sociologists say you cant prove a variable with a constant. The constants in American history are guns and teenagers. The variable is the crime rate. As guns have become more and more difficult to acquire and in some places actually banned, the crime rate has gone up. Obviously the causative factor is not guns.
Additionally, you have a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. The language of the Second Amendment is quite clear. It states, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” It doesnt state the right of the states or the right of militias. It states the right of the people. It shows that the reading comprehension of millions of Americans is in desperate need of an improvement.
The belief that an inanimate object can cause animate objects to change drastically their behavior is a silly superstition. Furthermore, it is flat stupid to propose laws that only the law-abiding will obey as a crime-fighting measure.
Sociologists say you cant prove a variable with a constant. The constants in American history are guns and teenagers. The variable is the crime rate. As guns have become more and more difficult to acquire and in some places actually banned, the crime rate has gone up. Obviously the causative factor is not guns.
Additionally, you have a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. The language of the Second Amendment is quite clear. It states, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” It doesnt state the right of the states or the right of militias. It states the right of the people. It shows that the reading comprehension of millions of Americans is in desperate need of an improvement.
The belief that an inanimate object can cause animate objects to change drastically their behavior is a silly superstition. Furthermore, it is flat stupid to propose laws that only the law-abiding will obey as a crime-fighting measure.
Originally Posted by HeathenBrewing
When guns were most available and virtually unregulated - when you could buy them without question the way you could buy a lawn mower, when you could buy them through the mail or from catalogs - there was less violent crime not more.
Sociologists say you cant prove a variable with a constant. The constants in American history are guns and teenagers. The variable is the crime rate. As guns have become more and more difficult to acquire and in some places actually banned, the crime rate has gone up. Obviously the causative factor is not guns.
Additionally, you have a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. The language of the Second Amendment is quite clear. It states, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” It doesnt state the right of the states or the right of militias. It states the right of the people. It shows that the reading comprehension of millions of Americans is in desperate need of an improvement.
The belief that an inanimate object can cause animate objects to change drastically their behavior is a silly superstition. Furthermore, it is flat stupid to propose laws that only the law-abiding will obey as a crime-fighting measure.
Sociologists say you cant prove a variable with a constant. The constants in American history are guns and teenagers. The variable is the crime rate. As guns have become more and more difficult to acquire and in some places actually banned, the crime rate has gone up. Obviously the causative factor is not guns.
Additionally, you have a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. The language of the Second Amendment is quite clear. It states, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” It doesnt state the right of the states or the right of militias. It states the right of the people. It shows that the reading comprehension of millions of Americans is in desperate need of an improvement.
The belief that an inanimate object can cause animate objects to change drastically their behavior is a silly superstition. Furthermore, it is flat stupid to propose laws that only the law-abiding will obey as a crime-fighting measure.





