Notices
Photography & Video A place to discuss and display cameras, equipment and photographs.

DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)

Old Jan 22, 2009 | 02:37 AM
  #2861  
DonNguyen's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,657
From: San Diego (4s king)
Default

Originally Posted by RnB180
Originally Posted by DonNguyen
thats in the camera raw tool GUY
I thought he was referring to the exposure in image settings in the ps menu,
In regards to exposure in the raw "tool" I use that often its a no brainer

my lens are slow, so I usually shoot slightly underexposed to get a higher shutter speed and fix later.
i'm pretty sure he was referring to the one in the PS menu, which i would never tell anyone to use...
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 02:40 AM
  #2862  
RnB180's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
From: Smallville, Kent farm
Default

Originally Posted by DonNguyen
Originally Posted by RnB180
Originally Posted by DonNguyen
here's my method of B&W conversion

1. Open your image
2. Add a Channel Mixer adjustment layer
3. Set to Monochrome
4. Use the following settings:
- Red: 28
- Green: 41
- Blue: 31
5. Adjust your curves, levels and brightness/contrast accordingly.
where did you learn this method? hah, thanks for the tip ill try that out.
a photography forum...i do a lot of reading
I should read up on it then. I was trained to use gradient map, not sure what the differences are between monochrome but from what I see by increasing the color levels, im assuming itll give it a slight vintage hue as opposed to grandient map that removes all the color information.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 02:44 AM
  #2863  
DonNguyen's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,657
From: San Diego (4s king)
Default

those setting replicate ilford fp4 film, which will give a truer black and white look

here's some more settings for different types of black and white film

Agfa 200X: 18, 41, 41
Agfapan 25: 25, 39, 36
Agfapan 100: 21, 40, 39
Agfapan 400: 20, 41, 39

Ilford Delta 100: 21, 42, 37
Ilford Delta 400: 22, 42, 36
Ilford Delta 400 Pro: 31, 36, 33

Ilford FP4: 28, 41, 31
Ilford HP5: 23, 37, 40
Ilford Pan F: 33, 36, 31
Ilford SFX: 36, 31, 33
Ilford XP2 Super: 21, 42, 37

Kodak Tmax 100: 24, 37, 39
Kodak Tmax 400: 27, 36, 37
Kodak Tri-X: 25, 35, 40
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 02:47 AM
  #2864  
RnB180's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
From: Smallville, Kent farm
Default

Originally Posted by DonNguyen
those setting replicate ilford fp4 film, which will give a truer black and white look

here's some more settings for different types of black and white film

Agfa 200X: 18, 41, 41
Agfapan 25: 25, 39, 36
Agfapan 100: 21, 40, 39
Agfapan 400: 20, 41, 39

Ilford Delta 100: 21, 42, 37
Ilford Delta 400: 22, 42, 36
Ilford Delta 400 Pro: 31, 36, 33

Ilford FP4: 28, 41, 31
Ilford HP5: 23, 37, 40
Ilford Pan F: 33, 36, 31
Ilford SFX: 36, 31, 33
Ilford XP2 Super: 21, 42, 37

Kodak Tmax 100: 24, 37, 39
Kodak Tmax 400: 27, 36, 37
Kodak Tri-X: 25, 35, 40
thats hardcore, hah.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 03:01 AM
  #2865  
DonNguyen's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,657
From: San Diego (4s king)
Default

;)
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 03:33 AM
  #2866  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

dude don't feed Don's montana sized ego anymore please.


ha ha j/k. Don knows a lot and is VERY knowledgeable with photography contrary to popular belief.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:45 AM
  #2867  
scion_jon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,841
From: In The Fast Lane
Default

which one is better?


Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:47 AM
  #2868  
tCtCtC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,857
From: North Hills, CA
Default

i no like the shine coming off the rims, throws the pic off so you dont know where to look
but from those i saw the second, more calm imo
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:48 AM
  #2869  
RnB180's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
From: Smallville, Kent farm
Default

fake stars ftl

second pic is better, but you see an outline around the car.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:49 AM
  #2870  
scion_jon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,841
From: In The Fast Lane
Default

thats not fake guy, that was b4 i bought my polarizer filter.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:50 AM
  #2871  
tCtCtC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,857
From: North Hills, CA
Default

doh.

PS it out then
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:51 AM
  #2872  
RnB180's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
From: Smallville, Kent farm
Default

Originally Posted by scion_jon
thats not fake guy, that was b4 i bought my polarizer filter.
those are real highlights? Seriously they look fake.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:52 AM
  #2873  
scion_jon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,841
From: In The Fast Lane
Default

yes they are ask elijah, thats why he suggested a polarizer filter
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:53 AM
  #2874  
RnB180's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
From: Smallville, Kent farm
Default

edited, so not to be rude.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:55 AM
  #2875  
scion_jon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,841
From: In The Fast Lane
Default

wow you really are gona be ignorant

the first pic is in raw form, and the 2nd pic is after I adjusted the raw
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:57 AM
  #2876  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

RnB they aren't fake at all. He showed me those shots and I immediately suggested and explained to him about a circular polarizer. Do not say it is fake again. That is just rude when he told u they weren't PSed. Sorry to break it to u guys but not all of the photographers on here rely on PS to make or break their shots.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:57 AM
  #2877  
scion_jon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,841
From: In The Fast Lane
Default

look at my set, this is when i first got the camera, and didnt have a polarizer filter.

why would i put fake stars on raw files?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/scion_j...7611800437132/
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:57 AM
  #2878  
RnB180's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
From: Smallville, Kent farm
Default

Originally Posted by scion_jon
wow you really are gona be ignorant

the first pic is in raw form, and the 2nd pic is after I adjusted the raw
jon, just giving you a hard time.

the highlights need to go though.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 05:57 AM
  #2879  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

Jon, btw the 2nd is a lot better. The picture isn't completely blown out like in the first one.
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 08:12 AM
  #2880  
ALaS's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 306
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by scion_jon
which one is better?


Since you asked. They're both crooked and both look fake and corny with the fake shine everywhere. Blue mountains. Your car glows. No bueno IMO.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35 PM.