FR-S/BRZ low 14sec 1/4 mile and track VS.
Last edited by dropzone; Apr 30, 2012 at 08:37 AM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member



Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Well here's my reliable source information from Motortrend..
Just posting qtr. mile information here, not trying to argue anything.
http://wot.motortrend.com/tested-201...ph-183407.html
Just posting qtr. mile information here, not trying to argue anything.
2013 Subaru BRZ 2.0L F-4/200-hp/151 lb-ft 22/30 mpg 2747 lb6.4 sec 14.9 sec @ 95.5 mph 120 ft26.2 sec @ 0.68 g (avg)
http://wot.motortrend.com/tested-201...ph-183407.html
Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/tested-201...#ixzz1tWQEzWgU
-----------------------------------------------------
BRZ tested at 15.3@92.1 here:
http://bcove.me/dp08h8pm
http://www.insideline.com/subaru/brz...and-video.html
-----------------------------------------------------
BRZ tested at 15.3@92.1 here:
http://bcove.me/dp08h8pm
http://www.insideline.com/subaru/brz...and-video.html
Last edited by NocturnalxRS6; Apr 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member



Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Here's a full test, posted about 5 days ago so not everybody has seen it yet..
Sixty miles per hour is reached in 6.6 seconds (6.3 seconds with one foot of rollout like on a drag strip), and the quarter-mile in 14.8 seconds at 93.8 mph. Yes, this result is notably quicker and faster than the BRZ, which did those deeds in 7.3, 7.0, and 15.3 seconds at 92.1, respectively. What's going on?
http://www.insideline.com/scion/fr-s...full-test.html
Sixty miles per hour is reached in 6.6 seconds (6.3 seconds with one foot of rollout like on a drag strip), and the quarter-mile in 14.8 seconds at 93.8 mph. Yes, this result is notably quicker and faster than the BRZ, which did those deeds in 7.3, 7.0, and 15.3 seconds at 92.1, respectively. What's going on?
http://www.insideline.com/scion/fr-s...full-test.html
Sorry I didn't watch all of the video, lost interest pretty quick. So why did they run 400m at the begining and end with much different times, how do we know they didn't change/modify something?
Thread Starter
Senior Member



Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Either way, the car is good for mid-low 14sec 1/4 miles with the right driver.
They didn't run at the beginning and at the end. It was all at the beginning. If you aren't going to watch something, why are you bothering to comment on it and ask questions later?
in the 400mm run..the first test was done at different launch rpms i think..2nd run was done at 3500rpm launch..if your read inside line comments it states this " FRS Rewards big-wheelspin launch with quicker accel than BRZ. Best launch from 5,500-5,700 rpm, spin tires through first, then grab 2nd."
Yes, that is old news. The Videos above were just released like yesterday. Keep in mind that land elevation will play a part in times, the driver being American is probably larger than the Japanese drivers in the video (who are pro drivers, where as Insideline and Motortrend are not pro drivers), and neither of these test are done at a traditional drag strip where VHT is laid down.
Either way, the car is good for mid-low 14sec 1/4 miles with the right driver.
They didn't run at the beginning and at the end. It was all at the beginning. If you aren't going to watch something, why are you bothering to comment on it and ask questions later?
Either way, the car is good for mid-low 14sec 1/4 miles with the right driver.
They didn't run at the beginning and at the end. It was all at the beginning. If you aren't going to watch something, why are you bothering to comment on it and ask questions later?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evolving_machine
Scion tC 2G Drivetrain & Power
17
Oct 21, 2023 01:16 PM
awdmofo
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
44
Feb 8, 2016 05:58 AM
TheTripleC
PPC: Vehicles
1
Jan 4, 2015 06:46 PM




