Notices

Spy photos of next-generation Prius hybrid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 04:05 AM
  #21  
polishstud's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 163
From: Palatine, IL
Default

Quote:
The interior of the new Prius hybrid, however, has had a significant re-design, with the world's most famous hybrid car adopting a far more modern look that shares styling cues with the Toyota Corolla...

Pundits are predicting the new Prius will be powered by a bigger, more powerful four-cylinder petrol engine - up from 1.5 to 1.8 litres - taken from the Corolla.

The new engine, when combined with a new electric motor, is expected to put out an extra 30kW of power, bringing total output of the hybrid powertrain to roughly 120kW, the same as Toyota’s Camry medium sedan.

Despite the extra power, fuel consumption will be better than the current model.

Some estimates say the new car will have a fuel label rating of just 2.9 litres per 100km, down from the current model's 4.4L/100km. These seem optimistic, however, given the increase in engine capacity.

The fuel economy improvements will come from a more efficient nickel-metal-hydride battery and updates to Toyota’s hybrid drivetrain.

There is also talk of a solar panel on the roof to power the electronics and air-conditioning. ...

A plug-in hybrid version is also expected to be available early next decade.

Well if the above information is true, then the Prius will have a much greater MPG increase than 3 miles.

2.9 L = 0.76531 Gallons. & 100km= 62.136 Miles.... Now 62.136 Miles / 0.76531 Gallons = 81.190 MPG

4.4 L = 1.161160 Gallons ......... Now 62.136 Miles / 1.161160 Gallons = 53.512 MPG

So Like I said, assuming these numbers are valid in the article, the car will be making 80 MPG

STNC
PostPosted: 8/27/08 10:10PM Post subject:
scionkidd wrote:
yea nothing new... its expected to get 100mpg



no...

It's expected to get like 3MPG more at the most...

Old Aug 31, 2008 | 04:30 AM
  #22  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

LIKE, I, SAID, 80mpg, too.
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 10:24 AM
  #23  
STNC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,023
Default

I'm just relaying what someone from Toyota told me.......
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #24  
George's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,627
From: North Los Angeles County
Default

Those claims of 80 or 100 MPG probably rise from use of the plug-in option to recharge the batteries. You'll buy less gas, but you'll end up spending more money on electricity.

I'd be very skeptical of these figures if they don't represent plug-in use. Even Priuses (Priii?) are subject to the laws of thermodynamics.
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 03:13 AM
  #25  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

With careful driving you can already make an existing or previous model year prius exceed 100 mpg. The one I demoed read 99mpg, I drove it like a little old lady riding hte brakes to the stop lights.

Of course real world economy for YOUR driving style varies.

Originally Posted by George
Those claims of 80 or 100 MPG probably rise from use of the plug-in option to recharge the batteries. You'll buy less gas, but you'll end up spending more money on electricity.

I'd be very skeptical of these figures if they don't represent plug-in use. Even Priuses (Priii?) are subject to the laws of thermodynamics.
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #26  
Blacktoast's Avatar
Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 79
From: Moxee, WA
Default spy photo

spy photo? I've seen duct tape before.
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 10:19 PM
  #27  
qbano239's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
From: Florida
Default

x2. nice though
Old Sep 7, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #28  
ZodtC's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 159
From: Beaumont, CA
Default

That picture sucks, The only hideous part about the prius is the rear, so show some rear pics and hopefully its not so ugly this time.
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 01:01 AM
  #29  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Its a shame aerodynamic cars arent cute. The rear "wing" is something added for the American market, over seas that is omitted and its a little nicer looking. Of course you see lots of strange looking cars in Japan.

Honda is copying their design with the new hybrid civic. Notice the high hatch where the deck lid is about even with the roof line? The new aero shape is a bullet, an areo front and square back.

Originally Posted by ZodtC
That picture sucks, The only hideous part about the prius is the rear, so show some rear pics and hopefully its not so ugly this time.
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 03:24 AM
  #30  
SatsumaxA's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 343
From: Satsuma, Louisiana
Default

Try using ultra storage capacitors,,,,
Especially the ceramic capacitor storage units "EE Store"
Here's Wiki link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEStor

Better yet, Honda has a total different idea, home and car energy generation platform working together....
http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-cla...nergy-station/
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 04:00 AM
  #31  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

The caps are going to have to wait a while, lithium is still in its infinit stage as is.

The Pickens plan is all about natural gas. Just think last year we used a 5 miles cubic square of it for both consumer and industrial. Now its not uncommon to see the local news when winter time approaches how the tones people cry over the prices and the hundreds of dollars they must pay for heat and how many go to electric as its cheaper.

Go Figure which is more affordable vs green, electric or cng?

Originally Posted by SatsumaxA
Try using ultra storage capacitors,,,,
Especially the ceramic capacitor storage units "EE Store"
Here's Wiki link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEStor

Better yet, Honda has a total different idea, home and car energy generation platform working together....
http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-cla...nergy-station/
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #32  
Gymo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 163
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

I love how Hondas new prius car looks IDENTICAL to a prius except the grille!
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #33  
George's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,627
From: North Los Angeles County
Default

Originally Posted by cobb
Heres what I know about the gm volt. The gm volt is going to use the same electric 3 phase ac system as the ev one they had out for lease only back in the late 90s, but with lithium batteries and plug in option. The engine will be the 3 cylinder 1.0 from the geo metro to a generator to recharge the battery only.

THe whole car is electric like the ev one and can get est 40 miles before it needs to be recharged or the gas engine to turn on. Therefore, if you drive it less than 40 miles and plug it in, no gas is used. If you make short trips only, your gas may go bad before its burned. If you need to go farther, no problem, you got the ability.
This is really the way to go. Toyota has been making small steps with its hybrid design, but the vehicle is really just a conventional car with electric boost/regen added. You still have to carry the conventional drivetrain, brakes, etc. along for the ride.

Get the engine away from powering the wheels directly and you can realize some great economies. It can run at constant speed for best efficiency, it can be packaged and placed at any convenient position in the vehicle, and it can be smaller and lighter. You could even make it a removable module so you don't have to carry it when you know you aren't going beyond your battery's range.

Make the drive all-electric and you get additional savings. Wires are flexible and more easily run than axles. Motors can also be generators so you might be able to get rid of most of the friction brakes, except for the one used for emergency/parking service. Design the motors right and you can put them right in the wheel hubs, so AWD, ABS, traction control, etc. become cheap and easy.

The next few years are going to be exciting!
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:44 PM
  #34  
Andrew1782's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,319
From: Central Valley California
Default

Originally Posted by George
Originally Posted by cobb
Heres what I know about the gm volt. The gm volt is going to use the same electric 3 phase ac system as the ev one they had out for lease only back in the late 90s, but with lithium batteries and plug in option. The engine will be the 3 cylinder 1.0 from the geo metro to a generator to recharge the battery only.

THe whole car is electric like the ev one and can get est 40 miles before it needs to be recharged or the gas engine to turn on. Therefore, if you drive it less than 40 miles and plug it in, no gas is used. If you make short trips only, your gas may go bad before its burned. If you need to go farther, no problem, you got the ability.
This is really the way to go. Toyota has been making small steps with its hybrid design, but the vehicle is really just a conventional car with electric boost/regen added. You still have to carry the conventional drivetrain, brakes, etc. along for the ride.

Get the engine away from powering the wheels directly and you can realize some great economies. It can run at constant speed for best efficiency, it can be packaged and placed at any convenient position in the vehicle, and it can be smaller and lighter. You could even make it a removable module so you don't have to carry it when you know you aren't going beyond your battery's range.

Make the drive all-electric and you get additional savings. Wires are flexible and more easily run than axles. Motors can also be generators so you might be able to get rid of most of the friction brakes, except for the one used for emergency/parking service. Design the motors right and you can put them right in the wheel hubs, so AWD, ABS, traction control, etc. become cheap and easy.

The next few years are going to be exciting!

PS. The Volt will sticker for 35-40k.......according to latest releases. Comical just absolutley comical.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 03:15 AM
  #35  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Yeah, the volt is going to be just that. An electric car with a gas generator. I think the electric rav 4 had a towable generator to extend the range making it a hybrid like if you needed to travel long ranges.



Oh yeah, toy had an electric suv that got equiviliant to 140 mpg in the mid 90s.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 10:20 PM
  #36  
George's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,627
From: North Los Angeles County
Default

Originally Posted by cobb
Oh yeah, toy had an electric suv that got equiviliant to 140 mpg in the mid 90s.
Those inflated mileage numbers are very suspect. Basically they are saying that since the electric car doesn't have to take the big Carnot efficiency hit (because it isn't a heat engine) then you can multiply the mileage by 3 or so to get the "equivalent" MPG.

The bad news is that most of that electricity came from heat engines, so it _is_ subject to that hit. They're being downright dishonest to ignore it.

The real number, of course, is Dollars Per Mile.

Here in SoCal, energy costs about 15 cents per kWh.

It takes the same amount of energy to push a car through the air regardless of where it came from. A typical car uses about 40HP at 60MPH cruise. This is about 30,000W. Do this for an hour and you consume 30kwh. or about $4.50, assuming perfect efficiency.

If I take that same $4.50 and buy gasoline I will get about 1.21 gallons at current high prices. Dividing that 60 miles by 1.21 means that the electric car is getting the money equivalent of 50 MPG. Not bad, but not exactly 140MPG either.
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 03:15 AM
  #37  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

You bring up good points. A lot of info is based on assumptions and averages. Much like existing cars and trucks, fuel economy is subject to how they are used and or misused. You maybe more likely to leave the ac on or eat lunch in your car if its electric vs gas at your job. I am sure I could think of many situations where an electric car can be used for other than driving, therefore screwing up the fuel economy.

Heck, Ive seen modifications to make your prius a UPS system to back up your house in the event the power fails.

Another reason gas has been used to power cars is because its affordable and the infostructure to move it around is already in place. Just think, the semi tanker that moves the gas around can carry 9000 gallons and takes roughly 500 gallons to go cross country.

Cant speak for the volt, but most electric cars use about 10-20hp to stay at highway speeds making most able to travel an hour or less at sustained speeds before the batteries go flat or something over heats. Thats with the gvw and another 1000lbs for lead acid batteries.

I am seriously considering an ev if my job installs a jack to plug it in. Lead acid batteries do not sit well partly discharged before damage occurs, plus most evs used in city driving get about 15 mils at 40mph before they need to be recharged and I live about 15 miles from work.
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #38  
George's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,627
From: North Los Angeles County
Default

I've been considering converting a motorcycle to electric for short-range (20 mile round trip) service. Unfortunately the only way to do this is to buy about $2K worth of lithium batteries. Lead-acid just doesn't cut it beyond about 10 miles in motorcycle-size packages. The performance is there, just not the range.
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #39  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Yeah, I was going to make an electric metro, but its nearly 10 grand with lead acid and the range isnt there.

You can find electric scooters and bikes online with lith batteries, but its going to cost you and many are of chineese orgins with questionable quality and mechanical break downs.

I had seriously considered the Vectrix http://www.vectrixusa.com/index3.html Its considered a 125cc motorcycle in VA and a motorcycle license is required to drive it in VA. At that, the "local" dealer is in NJ and they do not finance out of state people.
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #40  
SatsumaxA's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 343
From: Satsuma, Louisiana
Default

http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-cla...nergy-station/



http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-clarity/battery.aspx


Honda has their plan extended to home power as well....



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 PM.