Notices
Scion tC 1G Aero & Exterior Aero parts and exterior dress items...

Replacing the Sunroof

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #21  
Aroddalobster's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,713
From: CA
Default

uhm.. sorry infinite, but you sound pretty damn ignorant.
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #22  
InfiniteVisi0n's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,496
From: 60616
Default

Originally Posted by Aroddalobster
uhm.. sorry infinite, but you sound pretty damn ignorant.
haha ignorant to what degree? Look its my opinion and thats just how i feel. So what if you shave 30 to 45 pounds off your car. Either way our cars are still going to be pretty heavy. Does it save gas? Yea a couple miles whoppy doo. Reduce body roll?? Yea maybe but what are you going to do, take it autocrossing? Its still fwd. My point is that its a waste of money to rid the sunroof. You might as well have bought the spec tC. With the money you spend on replacing the sunroof..you could have bought a sway bar. I think Toyota knew what they were doing when they put certain stuff in certain places of a car. Maybe that heavy sunroof was placed there to perfectly balance out the car.
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #23  
SquallLHeart's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,699
Default

uhh.. no idea why you'd think the spec would be any better... sure you don't have some mechanical parts moving a glass moonroof..

but one large piece of solid glass?? i think would make absolutely no difference in weight or if so, completely negligible..
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #24  
Aroddalobster's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,713
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by InfiniteVisi0n
Originally Posted by Aroddalobster
uhm.. sorry infinite, but you sound pretty damn ignorant.
haha ignorant to what degree? Look its my opinion and thats just how i feel. So what if you shave 30 to 45 pounds off your car. Either way our cars are still going to be pretty heavy. Does it save gas? Yea a couple miles whoppy doo. Reduce body roll?? Yea maybe but what are you going to do, take it autocrossing? Its still fwd. My point is that its a waste of money to rid the sunroof. You might as well have bought the spec tC. With the money you spend on replacing the sunroof..you could have bought a sway bar. I think Toyota knew what they were doing when they put certain stuff in certain places of a car. Maybe that heavy sunroof was placed there to perfectly balance out the car.
dude, take a look at the OP. he clearly asks if it'll reduce body roll. will replacing the roof with something 30 lbs lighter help? absolutely to a certain degree. center of gravity will move down giving the car a more stable feel. will he go autocrossing? who knows, but he did ask something that had to do with handling, making me confused as to why you brought up the issue of 300 hp. but, i do agree wtih you, a sway bar will definitely help, hence why i have one also. but, the spec glass is pretty ideal for autocrossing because there's no motor, no heavier reinforcements that the regular sunroofs have. i have a friend who had picked up both roofs, and he said that the spec roof weighed significantly less.
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #25  
InfiniteVisi0n's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,496
From: 60616
Default

Originally Posted by Aroddalobster
Originally Posted by InfiniteVisi0n
Originally Posted by Aroddalobster
uhm.. sorry infinite, but you sound pretty damn ignorant.
haha ignorant to what degree? Look its my opinion and thats just how i feel. So what if you shave 30 to 45 pounds off your car. Either way our cars are still going to be pretty heavy. Does it save gas? Yea a couple miles whoppy doo. Reduce body roll?? Yea maybe but what are you going to do, take it autocrossing? Its still fwd. My point is that its a waste of money to rid the sunroof. You might as well have bought the spec tC. With the money you spend on replacing the sunroof..you could have bought a sway bar. I think Toyota knew what they were doing when they put certain stuff in certain places of a car. Maybe that heavy sunroof was placed there to perfectly balance out the car.
dude, take a look at the OP. he clearly asks if it'll reduce body roll. will replacing the roof with something 30 lbs lighter help? absolutely to a certain degree. center of gravity will move down giving the car a more stable feel. will he go autocrossing? who knows, but he did ask something that had to do with handling, making me confused as to why you brought up the issue of 300 hp. but, i do agree wtih you, a sway bar will definitely help, hence why i have one also. but, the spec glass is pretty ideal for autocrossing because there's no motor, no heavier reinforcements that the regular sunroofs have. i have a friend who had picked up both roofs, and he said that the spec roof weighed significantly less.
I agree brother but he also asked if it was a waste of money. I believe yes..even though that might be a good path to shed some weight and reduce body roll...there are so many other things he could do instead of wasting his money on this. Might as well go on a strict diet plan with his car and strip everything heavy in his car. Thats if he was serious about reducing body roll. Sways are enough.
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 04:37 AM
  #26  
divisii's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 372
From: SoCalifornia
Default

I believe my Spec roof has the same bracing, just no motor/electronics.

The best place to remove weight would be from the highest point of the car.

Estimates I've read say -100lbs is worth the equivalent of 10hp
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:58 AM
  #27  
InfiniteVisi0n's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,496
From: 60616
Default

and 45 is no where near 100
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 09:47 PM
  #28  
Scionman09's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 142
From: Columbus, GA
Default

Totally random but that glass sunroof is indestructible lol...in the event of a rollover your head WILL be protected.
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #29  
SquallLHeart's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,699
Default

.... it's glass... it breaks.
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #30  
Scionman09's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 142
From: Columbus, GA
Default

Originally Posted by SquallLHeart
.... it's glass... it breaks.
NORMAL glass does. Check this out. Some guy by the name of Bloch wrote this...


Scion tC is One of Eight Vehicles to Meet Proposed Roof Crush Standard
posted in Scion tC News |

Bloch said that the auto companies know how to make safe roofs, but only eight vehicles currently on the road meet his proposed standard of a strength to weight ratio of four to one or more.

According to Bloch, those vehicles are: The 2006 Volkswagen Jetta has an SWR (5.1 to one), the 2007 Toyota Scion tC SWR (4.6 to one), the 2006 Volvo XC 90 (4.6 to one), the 2006 Honda Civic (4.5 to one), the 2007 Toyota Tacoma pickup truck (4.4 to one) the 2006 Mazda 5 (4.4 to one), the 2007 Toyota Camry (4.3 to one), and the 2007 Toyota Yaris – it’s a small inexpensive car – (4.0 to one).

“So, there are only eight cars with strength to weight ratios of four or better,” Bloch said.

“And one is a small inexpensive automobile. And yet, if you look at the Dodge Ram pickup truck and the Ford F250 pick-up truck, their strength to weight ratio is 1.7 to one.”

Long freakin story short...that glass is there for a reason.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 02:28 AM
  #31  
darkscion's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 176
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Default

has anyone removed the motor/track/bracing/and ALL the roof glass? im pretty sure its alot more than 35lbs.more like 100+ and if your going to do something like this you might as well go all out,or it wont be worth it.that said removing 100lbs from the roof will make a huge difference in how the car handles.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 02:45 AM
  #32  
divisii's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 372
From: SoCalifornia
Default

Originally Posted by divisii
I believe my Spec roof has the same bracing, just no motor/electronics.

The best place to remove weight would be from the highest point of the car.

Estimates I've read say -100lbs is worth the equivalent of 10hp
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I wasnt implying this mod was worth -100lbs, it's an estimate value for the value of weight loss.
Lost in translation-- optimistically, this mod would be equivalent to something that adds 5hp.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 03:34 AM
  #33  
Crayola_G's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 916
From: Miami, FL
Default

dude just take ur backseats and spare out.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 04:16 AM
  #34  
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,746
From: LOWLOW Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by divisii
Originally Posted by divisii
I believe my Spec roof has the same bracing, just no motor/electronics.

The best place to remove weight would be from the highest point of the car.

Estimates I've read say -100lbs is worth the equivalent of 10hp
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I wasnt implying this mod was worth -100lbs, it's an estimate value for the value of weight loss.
Lost in translation-- optimistically, this mod would be equivalent to something that adds 5hp.
decreasing wait will NEVER=more HP.
thats a common misconception.
it increases the power to weight ratio.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 04:30 AM
  #35  
divisii's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 372
From: SoCalifornia
Default

^of course, it is actually power to weight, thanks for the clarification, yellowxhoodie.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 04:36 AM
  #36  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by divisii
Originally Posted by divisii
I believe my Spec roof has the same bracing, just no motor/electronics.

The best place to remove weight would be from the highest point of the car.

Estimates I've read say -100lbs is worth the equivalent of 10hp
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I wasnt implying this mod was worth -100lbs, it's an estimate value for the value of weight loss.
Lost in translation-- optimistically, this mod would be equivalent to something that adds 5hp.
17lbs is approx the equivalent to 1hp.

But the point that people seem to be missing, is the location of this weight. It's sitting directly on top of the car, the worst possible place to have weight. 50lbs is a lot of weight when it's completely out of place.

Originally Posted by Scionman09
Originally Posted by SquallLHeart
.... it's glass... it breaks.
NORMAL glass does. Check this out. Some guy by the name of Bloch wrote this...


Scion tC is One of Eight Vehicles to Meet Proposed Roof Crush Standard
posted in Scion tC News |

Bloch said that the auto companies know how to make safe roofs, but only eight vehicles currently on the road meet his proposed standard of a strength to weight ratio of four to one or more.

According to Bloch, those vehicles are: The 2006 Volkswagen Jetta has an SWR (5.1 to one), the 2007 Toyota Scion tC SWR (4.6 to one), the 2006 Volvo XC 90 (4.6 to one), the 2006 Honda Civic (4.5 to one), the 2007 Toyota Tacoma pickup truck (4.4 to one) the 2006 Mazda 5 (4.4 to one), the 2007 Toyota Camry (4.3 to one), and the 2007 Toyota Yaris – it’s a small inexpensive car – (4.0 to one).

“So, there are only eight cars with strength to weight ratios of four or better,” Bloch said.

“And one is a small inexpensive automobile. And yet, if you look at the Dodge Ram pickup truck and the Ford F250 pick-up truck, their strength to weight ratio is 1.7 to one.”

Long freakin story short...that glass is there for a reason.
The glass isn't what makes the tC a great roll over car, it's the structure of the frame. Look at every single roll over incident of a tC. The entire roof is gone.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 04:45 AM
  #37  
jbae1221's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 601
Default

^^agreed
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 05:20 AM
  #38  
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,746
From: LOWLOW Chicago
Default

ive been seriously debating buying this over the winter.
well see what happens.
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #39  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default



Frame still intact. Glass completely gone.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #40  
RedDragons's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 327
From: Rosamond, CA
Default

anyone replaced the entire glass roof? any links? any manufacturers? ive googled it in everyway i could imagine and found nothing.



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:09 PM.