yeah SC or Turbo will do that , combined with full exhaust head package...lol im at 145 whp right now in my auto

 

not with just those mods.

 

[quote="halfbreed"][quote="acasanova"]
What mods then? Arnt you that little hateful turd that was on another threat talking crap about autos?

 

hahahah, he said turd

 

All this is doing is making the test procedures more accurate so its easier to compare power. Its similar to the going from gross to net hp. This might be backwards I dont remember. Same engine with a different way of rating it.
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/cf.htm This tells how it changed a little.

 

[quote="acasanova"][quote="halfbreed"]Damm, I am sorry if you think I was a hateful turd? I have a lot of mods and I plan on taking pictures and sharing soon.

 

* The Society of Automotive Engineers revised Standard J1349, which sets forth the protocol for testing horsepower and torque as of the first of this year. One purpose of the change was to try to achieve more consistent ratings throughout the industry. California requires that advertised horsepower claims be determined using the SAE Standard. The revision specifies that certain equipment be installed on the engine and operating at the time of testing, as well as the use of the manufacturer required grade of fuel during the test. Presumably, all manufacturers will be using the revised Standard for future tests.
Toyota decided to retest most of its engines using the new protocol this year. Consequently, the horsepower and torque ratings for many of our vehicles declined this year. Any changes in horsepower and torque ratings based on the implementation of the new testing protocol, however, have no impact on actual engine performance.

This is on Scion's website. the xB went from 108hp to 103 HP.......go figure

 

ha ha im a hateful turd hating on autos? well yes i do hate autos. there for ___s who cant drive (especially when they manually shift their auto and try to justify it) but no with i/h/e/ you will not pull 157WHP. ive worked on performance cars for years (out of a performance shop) and im sure you flip my double cheeseburgers for a living. i bet your car is auto with a aluminum spoiler huh?

 

Lol ignorant hateful and a turd great combo Do a search moron I,H,E on the TC actually yields 160hp at the wheels 5sp TC.

 

yes, you are correct

 

http://www.autoblog.com/entry/1234000207054762/

Ok, that's it. I'm giving up on horsepower and I'm just going to look at torque.

Apparently the SAE tightened up the test where its tougher to fudge certain things like how much oil is in the crankcase and whether the engine has high-octane fuel. It was already pretty strict on density altitude.

 

yeah, I think its odd that a suposed 250 HP Nissan Altima, a now 190 HP camry run nearly identical 1/4 mile times.......

15.9 VS 16.2

and the camry has 60 HP less? I now take HP with a grain of salt, and look at track times...

 

I wonder if the Nissan has not been retested and it will also be lowered. What are the trap speeds because thats a good indicator of horsepower? I dont think its required to retest all your cars right now just when you change it. Hard to compare track times because location can make a huge difference (temp, elev, and sticky surface). Ill assume the drivers are similar because mags. test cars all the time so they should be good at it and usually get pretty consistant times with the same car.

 

Those times are from car and driver- so i am assuming that the were tested in simular locations...