Alphawerks headers and other headers question
#1
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,372
Alphawerks headers and other headers question
with headers that eliminate the cat, when you get your car tested for emmisions, will the computer that plugs into you car detect that it is gone? and wil you fail / pass the test?
#3
Re: Alphawerks headers and other headers question
Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
with headers that eliminate the cat, when you get your car tested for emmisions, will the computer that plugs into you car detect that it is gone? and wil you fail / pass the test?
#4
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,372
thats what i thought, i would install the anti-fouler when i get my headers then. thanks alot thrawn. i dont think they look under the hood... im pretty sure they just do the sniffer at the exaust tip and hook the cpu up to the cars ecu
#5
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,372
Another question i have on the headers is why does the CEL come on in the first place? is it because the cat is gone? or because it is allowing more airflow? or both? I want to ensure it wont hert my engine in any way
#6
Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
Another question i have on the headers is why does the CEL come on in the first place? is it because the cat is gone? or because it is allowing more airflow? or both? I want to ensure it wont hert my engine in any way
#7
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,372
Thanks for your help, I think i will install my AF ratio gauge before i install my headers (which i havent bought yet) lol. I am assuming that same goes for intakes? it throws the CEL becuaase it is taking it more air?
#8
Originally Posted by Thrawn
Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
Another question i have on the headers is why does the CEL come on in the first place? is it because the cat is gone? or because it is allowing more airflow? or both? I want to ensure it wont hert my engine in any way
#9
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,372
but if i were to add the anti-fouler the ecu wouldnt know that there is more air flowing, so it would have no need to send more fuel (in the ecu's mind), correct?
#10
it wouldn't know as much air would be. may actually lean it up closer to what it should be (14.5-14.7 AF ratio). I haven't seen the dyno of an antifouler with the AF reading included though. that's the only reason i haven't bought one.. no proof!
#11
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,372
Im in the same boat Matty, Too many things could go wrong. the antifouler is just tricking the ecu... when it needs to be telling it to match that airflow with gas.
#12
Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
Im in the same boat Matty, Too many things could go wrong. the antifouler is just tricking the ecu... when it needs to be telling it to match that airflow with gas.
Originally Posted by matty-tC
hopefully the ecu seeing more air is going to send more fuel... and i don't think you'd have to worry about running so lean it detonates when you add just a header. stock the car runs 12.1 a/f or so... which is a few points rich already
#14
Originally Posted by matty-tC
it wouldn't know as much air would be. may actually lean it up closer to what it should be (14.5-14.7 AF ratio). I haven't seen the dyno of an antifouler with the AF reading included though. that's the only reason i haven't bought one.. no proof!
[/quote] Old dyno on a nice 80 degree day. Only mod was a K&N drop in filter, the Injen axleback is on the title ,but wasent installed at the time. A/F ratios are a bit rich as you can see.
[/quote] Recent dyno again disregard the title, temp is accurate 97 degree. Only mods were Alphawerks Header and Injen Short ram stock exhaust took off injen exhaust due to rasp . Second run the last run was the best at 141hp 144 tq but i couldnt get that saved. A/F ratio just a bit leaner.
#15
I was under the impression that the purpose of a header was to facilitate the outflow of the exhaust...isnt the a/f ratio determined by the inflow of oxygen? if that be true i would think that the ecu would throw a CEL simply because the cat is no longer there therefore the 02 sensor isn't performing it's function.......if i am wrong please humble teachers, teach me
#16
Originally Posted by tCarloRS1.0
I was under the impression that the purpose of a header was to facilitate the outflow of the exhaust...isnt the a/f ratio determined by the inflow of oxygen? if that be true i would think that the ecu would throw a CEL simply because the cat is no longer there therefore the 02 sensor isn't performing it's function.......if i am wrong please humble teachers, teach me
#17
Senior Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,947
new headers usually mean that you wunt pass smog but i guess we already established that.
you can get a street legal exhaust and kinda work your way around emissions.
as the A/F ratio. the car sees taht more gas can be expelled so it trys to pull more air in with more gas burning thus producing more HP.
i also recently dynoed my car with the AW headers. +11hp/+10tq
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...884&highlight=
you can get a street legal exhaust and kinda work your way around emissions.
as the A/F ratio. the car sees taht more gas can be expelled so it trys to pull more air in with more gas burning thus producing more HP.
i also recently dynoed my car with the AW headers. +11hp/+10tq
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...884&highlight=
#18
Originally Posted by tCarloRS1.0
I was under the impression that the purpose of a header was to facilitate the outflow of the exhaust...isnt the a/f ratio determined by the inflow of oxygen? if that be true i would think that the ecu would throw a CEL simply because the cat is no longer there therefore the 02 sensor isn't performing it's function.......if i am wrong please humble teachers, teach me