Another update on TRD blower...
I called Toyota once again for my little bi-weekly updates from the parts guy...
From what he told me, Toyota was unhappy with the result in performance with the blower. They are spending more R&D time to either tweak the design a little or re-work the setup they chose. They are shooting for a 60-70hp gain, not the rumored 40-45. When they get the car to perform the way they want, with the higher top-end, they will release it.
All I know is that it will be soon. TRD usually doesn't take this long to adust/fix something.
From what he told me, Toyota was unhappy with the result in performance with the blower. They are spending more R&D time to either tweak the design a little or re-work the setup they chose. They are shooting for a 60-70hp gain, not the rumored 40-45. When they get the car to perform the way they want, with the higher top-end, they will release it.
All I know is that it will be soon. TRD usually doesn't take this long to adust/fix something.
Originally Posted by hotbox05
well u might be able to kick some srt-4's just not anything awd
My 200hp civic would pull on my modded evo 8 on the highway. AWD is good for certain things. Though I'd much rather have awd over the two, it's not always best.
well street or drag. awd puts u fast in a quickness. eh it's still a honduh. and that modded 8 must be smokin crack or sumptin. i guess it all depends on driver , rpm , gearing , when the boost hits all that jazz.
Originally Posted by Tcguy
I called Toyota once again for my little bi-weekly updates from the parts guy...
From what he told me, Toyota was unhappy with the result in performance with the blower. They are spending more R&D time to either tweak the design a little or re-work the setup they chose. They are shooting for a 60-70hp gain, not the rumored 40-45. When they get the car to perform the way they want, with the higher top-end, they will release it.
All I know is that it will be soon. TRD usually doesn't take this long to adust/fix something.
From what he told me, Toyota was unhappy with the result in performance with the blower. They are spending more R&D time to either tweak the design a little or re-work the setup they chose. They are shooting for a 60-70hp gain, not the rumored 40-45. When they get the car to perform the way they want, with the higher top-end, they will release it.
All I know is that it will be soon. TRD usually doesn't take this long to adust/fix something.
It's not a blower, a blower is a roots type supercharger.
a blower is a supercharger... that includes centrifugals like the Vortech unit that TRD is talking about...
If TRD really wanted to do it right, they'd use a turbo instead... I'm not anti-blower by any means, the Vortech blowers are great pieces... my '94 Camaro ran 9.56 @ 143 with one... but compared to a turbo, well, there just is no comparison... On my car, it was taking 200hp just to turn the blower... a smaller blower like the tC would use certainly wouldn't have this much drag, but if the blown setup actually made 200hp at the flywheel, the engine would be seeing the strain and stresses (and fuel consumption) of producing more like 240-250hp... in other words, if 200hp blown is safe, then 230+ hp turbo'd would be safe as well... or to put it yet another way, you can always make more net power, with the same level of safety, with a turbo...
i'm curious to find out more about the ECU and fuel mods that the TRD kit is/was using... are there any public details on that? those items would be pretty similar for either the turbo or blower approach, so it might be nice if you could buy a few pieces from TRD and then just do the turbo/wastegate/manifold custom... on the other hand, the TRD pricetag would likely exceed what you could get an aftermarket piggyback and injectors for... just some random ideas...
If TRD really wanted to do it right, they'd use a turbo instead... I'm not anti-blower by any means, the Vortech blowers are great pieces... my '94 Camaro ran 9.56 @ 143 with one... but compared to a turbo, well, there just is no comparison... On my car, it was taking 200hp just to turn the blower... a smaller blower like the tC would use certainly wouldn't have this much drag, but if the blown setup actually made 200hp at the flywheel, the engine would be seeing the strain and stresses (and fuel consumption) of producing more like 240-250hp... in other words, if 200hp blown is safe, then 230+ hp turbo'd would be safe as well... or to put it yet another way, you can always make more net power, with the same level of safety, with a turbo...
i'm curious to find out more about the ECU and fuel mods that the TRD kit is/was using... are there any public details on that? those items would be pretty similar for either the turbo or blower approach, so it might be nice if you could buy a few pieces from TRD and then just do the turbo/wastegate/manifold custom... on the other hand, the TRD pricetag would likely exceed what you could get an aftermarket piggyback and injectors for... just some random ideas...
Originally Posted by 2JZfan
a blower is a supercharger... that includes centrifugals like the Vortech unit that TRD is talking about...
If TRD really wanted to do it right, they'd use a turbo instead... I'm not anti-blower by any means, the Vortech blowers are great pieces... my '94 Camaro ran 9.56 @ 143 with one... but compared to a turbo, well, there just is no comparison... On my car, it was taking 200hp just to turn the blower... a smaller blower like the tC would use certainly wouldn't have this much drag, but if the blown setup actually made 200hp at the flywheel, the engine would be seeing the strain and stresses (and fuel consumption) of producing more like 240-250hp... in other words, if 200hp blown is safe, then 230+ hp turbo'd would be safe as well... or to put it yet another way, you can always make more net power, with the same level of safety, with a turbo...
i'm curious to find out more about the ECU and fuel mods that the TRD kit is/was using... are there any public details on that? those items would be pretty similar for either the turbo or blower approach, so it might be nice if you could buy a few pieces from TRD and then just do the turbo/wastegate/manifold custom... on the other hand, the TRD pricetag would likely exceed what you could get an aftermarket piggyback and injectors for... just some random ideas...
If TRD really wanted to do it right, they'd use a turbo instead... I'm not anti-blower by any means, the Vortech blowers are great pieces... my '94 Camaro ran 9.56 @ 143 with one... but compared to a turbo, well, there just is no comparison... On my car, it was taking 200hp just to turn the blower... a smaller blower like the tC would use certainly wouldn't have this much drag, but if the blown setup actually made 200hp at the flywheel, the engine would be seeing the strain and stresses (and fuel consumption) of producing more like 240-250hp... in other words, if 200hp blown is safe, then 230+ hp turbo'd would be safe as well... or to put it yet another way, you can always make more net power, with the same level of safety, with a turbo...
i'm curious to find out more about the ECU and fuel mods that the TRD kit is/was using... are there any public details on that? those items would be pretty similar for either the turbo or blower approach, so it might be nice if you could buy a few pieces from TRD and then just do the turbo/wastegate/manifold custom... on the other hand, the TRD pricetag would likely exceed what you could get an aftermarket piggyback and injectors for... just some random ideas...
To whoever said we'll be able to race SRT-4's.....maybe...If we had the supercharger + mods and if they were stock....maybe... SRT-4's are built for boost from the factory and have an insane top end. They were built for speed - the tC wasn't. Just take comfort in the fact that their interior is ____ty
Originally Posted by Mediocre Generica
Turbo setups are both more costly and less reliable. With a turbocharger, there oil coolant lines, a new exhaust manifold, and almost always an intercooler. Superchargers are more reliable, less costly, and simpler to maintain - at the expense fo efficiency. Thats a tradeoff I'd be glad to take.
To whoever said we'll be able to race SRT-4's.....maybe...If we had the supercharger + mods and if they were stock....maybe... SRT-4's are built for boost from the factory and have an insane top end. They were built for speed - the tC wasn't. Just take comfort in the fact that their interior is ____ty
To whoever said we'll be able to race SRT-4's.....maybe...If we had the supercharger + mods and if they were stock....maybe... SRT-4's are built for boost from the factory and have an insane top end. They were built for speed - the tC wasn't. Just take comfort in the fact that their interior is ____ty
I LOVE turbos, for few years I have been driving SAAB '97 9000 AERO 2.3L (4I) turbo (230HP stock) and you would not believe how many suprised grins I saw on BMW and Mustang owners' faces...
The problem is that turbos are technically more advanced and demanding than superchargers, it is not an easy answer and with setup giving out more than 50HP there is also a matter of engine management. AFAIK one of the best designs is SAAB trionic and I know some Volvo guys that were experimenting with that...
If only TURBO was available on tC.. BTW, doesn't "T" in "Tc" stand for TURBO ?
))BTW The 9000 replacement SAAB 95 AERO puts out 250HP from 2.3L (4I) engine and it also is FWD (all SAABs are)







