Just Realized Something...who care if we can keep with a Si
what about the new chevy cobalt SS
260hp/260ft-lbs for 22,995 base price
0 to 60 in 5.7 and a 14.1 1/4 mile time...all warrantied
new best speed for the money? i think so...well between this and the MS3
MAZDASPEED 3
263hp/280ft-lbs for 23, 310 base price
0 to 60 in 5.6, 14.2 1/4 mile
or Si for 22k lol no comparison
260hp/260ft-lbs for 22,995 base price
0 to 60 in 5.7 and a 14.1 1/4 mile time...all warrantied
new best speed for the money? i think so...well between this and the MS3
MAZDASPEED 3
263hp/280ft-lbs for 23, 310 base price
0 to 60 in 5.6, 14.2 1/4 mile
or Si for 22k lol no comparison
Originally Posted by AdmirN
Put a grand into an SI and it will keep up with them or even beat em... A car with i/h/e keeping up with a FI car that's pretty sad.
There is no point in there comments of yeah but add this money to this car and its faster, because the same could always be said for the other car as well.
Not to mention, I/H/E on an SI will only get it close to a Cobalt in a straight line. Put it in the turns and the SI, again loses!!!!
I was just trying to compare the prices between them.
I know if you put a grand into a ss it would beat a si. but for the price, i would rather take a car that is a grand cheaper and just put i/h/e that will keep up with cars that are FI...
My friend has a type-s, basically the same engine as an si keeps up with ss's and srt-4's non stock...
I know if you put a grand into a ss it would beat a si. but for the price, i would rather take a car that is a grand cheaper and just put i/h/e that will keep up with cars that are FI...
My friend has a type-s, basically the same engine as an si keeps up with ss's and srt-4's non stock...
Originally Posted by AdmirN
I was just trying to compare the prices between them.
I know if you put a grand into a ss it would beat a si. but for the price, i would rather take a car that is a grand cheaper and just put i/h/e that will keep up with cars that are FI...
My friend has a type-s, basically the same engine as an si keeps up with ss's and srt-4's non stock...
I know if you put a grand into a ss it would beat a si. but for the price, i would rather take a car that is a grand cheaper and just put i/h/e that will keep up with cars that are FI...
My friend has a type-s, basically the same engine as an si keeps up with ss's and srt-4's non stock...
Originally Posted by AdmirN
Oh i know they can't, but there are other factors that go along... But i know the tubro cobalts are still going to be slow just like the sc ones.
not only that but it has launch control and no lift shifting (leave foot on gas)
there is also an option to get a computerized pillar gauge with an lcd screen that does a lot of cool stuff
its a pretty amazing car for the price
Originally Posted by AdmirN
Oh i know they can't, but there are other factors that go along... But i know the tubro cobalts are still going to be slow just like the sc ones.
If you think the Cobalt SS turbo is slow, then you also think the EVO is slow, the STI is slow, the G37S is slow and so on and so on.
And the Cobalt SS came pretty close to matching the EVOX on the racd track.
http://www.motortrend.com/features/p...ing/index.html
Granted I would never ever ever buy a Cobalt SS, you cant deny what it can do. And to call it slow, is to call every other car on the street slow as well!!
^ i second that chevy is a crap company to begin with i would never even wanna try and beat on that car witout it dying on me wont last 90 to 100k ever.
and as far as the mazda goes they suck also another crap brand that wont last long in th elong run buying one of their cars not to mention there resale value
id go wit an Si anyday compared to these 2 brands more reliable and u add parts 2 it its taking both those cars
and as far as the mazda goes they suck also another crap brand that wont last long in th elong run buying one of their cars not to mention there resale value
id go wit an Si anyday compared to these 2 brands more reliable and u add parts 2 it its taking both those cars
I would definitely buy a MS3 or SS over a SI any day. Yes the Si with minor mods could keep up NA but then you are still dealing with a torqueless wonder. Go drive an Si and then go drive the Mazda 2.3 turbo built for midrange. When I test drove a new Si I actually started laughing to myself because while it is lots of fun while floored, you have to put the gas like 2/3 the way down to go anywhere.
the engineers at gm have maxed out the transmission for the new colbalt so for tuners out there wating to make more power it won't be possible. thats why i would get something else
Originally Posted by MrBurrito
the engineers at gm have maxed out the transmission for the new colbalt so for tuners out there wating to make more power it won't be possible. thats why i would get something else
Well I found this. It doesn't say anything about transmission maxed however we all know true launching isn't exactly gentile.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/..._drive_review/
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/..._drive_review/
i would never get a chevy ever. thats y GM offers that lifetime drivetrain warranty cause they know there cars are sh*t
now if it were an oldskool chevy now thats different i would never buy anything thats new
now if it were an oldskool chevy now thats different i would never buy anything thats new





