Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

tc tunerz header dyno / not much gain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 06:25 AM
  #21  
maverick81's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Default

Wow dj4monie you must be a genius. The point of this forum is to discuss the cars and the parts we may or may not put on them, if you see everybody else as an idiot not worthy of your time then don't post anything.
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 06:41 AM
  #22  
k20a3epsi's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 36
Default

DC makes nice stuff (i own a ceramic shorty header from dc on my si) but overall you won't feel anything on the butt dyno.

I would say the main thing to look at perfomance-wise would be finding a header with larger diameter primaries that still keeps the lower torque curve from dropping as a sacrifice for more up top hp. .02
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 06:28 AM
  #23  
tCtunerZ's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 261
From: The Internet
Default

**UPDATE**

Stock Scion tC= 113.4 Torque / 130.0 Power
With Header System= 138.9 Torque / 129.8 Power
With Header System and no Stock Intake Box= 141.2 Torque / 133.5 Power

The header system yeilds a .2 Power loss and 25.5 Torque gain.
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #24  
djaaronp's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 216
From: ATX
Default

Are you kidding me? The tC has a 30hp loss through the Tranny? That doesnt seem right. Thats a 20% loss. I thought it was only like 12-15% loss.

And torque? Your baseline says that the tC looses 30% torque from the crank to the wheels. I'm not so sure those are good numbers to go by for a stock tC.
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:41 PM
  #25  
acasanova's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 615
From: Miami, FL
Default

I agree those baseline numbers are way off especially at sea level .Should be about 140s for both. My FRIENDS CIVIC EX automatic dynos at 112 hp to the wheels. No mods sea level.
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 12:49 AM
  #26  
tCtunerZ's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 261
From: The Internet
Default

Please note our car is an Auto and not a 5spd.
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 02:10 AM
  #27  
squirrel's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Default

The tubing aren't the same length, thus the reaso for no gains.
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 03:49 AM
  #28  
tCtunerZ's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 261
From: The Internet
Default

Originally Posted by squirrel
The tubing aren't the same length, thus the reaso for no gains.
Sorry to inform you that the pipes are equal length.
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 04:21 AM
  #29  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

i wonder what's up with that 20% loss in power. auto or not thats crazy.
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 05:20 AM
  #30  
acasanova's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 615
From: Miami, FL
Default

wow if anyone here finds an auto tc dyno chart please post a link.
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #31  
tCtunerZ's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 261
From: The Internet
Default

Originally Posted by acasanova
wow if anyone here finds an auto tc dyno chart please post a link.
We will have new dyno's in 2 weeks with videos and pictures!
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #32  
squirrel's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Default

Originally Posted by tCtunerZ
Originally Posted by squirrel
The tubing aren't the same length, thus the reaso for no gains.
Sorry to inform you that the pipes are equal length.
Yeah, not all four are, maybe two pairs of two. Ok, if you say they are. Maybe the tubes are the wrong length then. Hmm, is Chris paid back in full yet?
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 03:09 AM
  #33  
Mx6GT91's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Good to know your testing the the header on an automatic car because my moms is also.

I dont see how the auto tranny could cause that big of a torque loss??
Hp doesnt look bad but 114flbs is like a Civic. Ewwww!!!!
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 04:55 AM
  #34  
Tcguy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 168
Default

dude a civic auto puts less than 100 at the wheels stock.
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 05:06 AM
  #35  
Mx6GT91's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
From: Orlando, FL
Default

I was talking about a new Civic Si.
It didnt have to be an automatic. 114ftlbs at the wheels is horrible for a car with 163 crank ftlbs.
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 02:38 AM
  #36  
HighlanderMac's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 948
From: Keller, TX
Default

Man there is a HUGE difference between the Auto and the 5-speed.
I dynoed my stock tC at 130hp/144ft-lbs tourque.

I cant wait for the info on the turbo kit to come out.
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 06:00 AM
  #37  
acasanova's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 615
From: Miami, FL
Default

I agree there is going to be a difference in both trannys but not "HUGE" especially a 30% drivetrain loss. Thats way too much i expected 129 or 133 at the wheels auto.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #38  
its_ikon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,128
From: Henderson, NV (was 909)
Default

who manufacturers the header?
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #39  
dmitri's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by dj4monie
You have to add MASS to your exhaust to make it quiet. If you need to ASK what that is, nevermind.
Dork.
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #40  
oldman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 329
Default

dyno reads WHP, it uses a pickup to calculate torque, sometimes the pick is flaky and the torque is WAY off. I owned and ran a dyno shop for a LONG time. A header does not lose 30 ft-lbs but I can believe it only made .2 WHP.

The scion TC has a OK factory header and a large well shaped exhaust. I would expect little gains from the whole system. Header to tail pipe. Say 10 to 15 WHP. That said it would not be worth the NOISE, the lack of OEM warranty etc. I'd just save the $1000 and wait to see what the supercharger is like.

IMO a $4000 supercharger with factory backing at 40 WHP is worth FAR more then a Header, complete exhaust, TB, and CAI at $1500 for say 22 WHP. The supercharger is going to offer FAR more torque, far more useful driving power, quite. cool supercharger badge, ultimate bragging rights.

You drive torque, you buy HP. The supercharge supplies both, the other mods only supply 1/2: the HP part. i.e. the TRD supercharger will put out 180 ft-lbs to the wheels and the other mods put out 140 so it is more like $4000 for 40 ft-lbs useful 99.99% of the time vs $1500 for 3 ft-lbs only useful in the upper rev range aka HP.

I found this here:

Secret Weapon Intake (no air box, open hood)
Baseline - 141.1hp, 151.1 ft/lb
SW Intake - 147.6hp, 154.8 ft/lb

Full Race Header (SW Intake, open header, ignition bridge)
Baseline - 147.6hp, 151.1 ft/lb
Race Header - 159.7hp, 160.7ft/lb

http://www.clubsciontc.com/modules.p...r=asc&start=45

I assume you need to registered to read the actual post. Never the less a RACE header with no exhaust at all makes 12 HP no doubt that most it is on the tip end. The intake is 6 WHP and seems to in for a rework. So lets say a “working” intake is 10 HP. There ya go 22 WHP race header no exhaust at all, and please cars don’t make more WHP capped up, at least not at WOT.



The scion TC performance has the 22 WHP with: header, intake II, TB, exhaust.


http://suzukird.com/scion-tc-perform...er_exhaust.jpg

Looks to be a race header so CEL and illegal. Surprising torque but the run does start almost ½ through the engine power curve.

I think that just about does it. Normally aspirated you are looking at about 20 to 25 HP with simple stuff upto $1500.00.

Supercharger say 40 HP and drivable low end torque, whisper quiet (important for me), will have some gear whine ( I like that sound vs blab shift blab sound), for $4000.00 no CEL, legal (a good thing), no warranty problems (a really good thing).

One last thing and I’m know on my last board to do this (long post), there whole blurb that a header does not void your warranty is just internet hype by guys that don’t know. The factory and I mean ALL factories not just Toyota have a canned speech where the “engineer” show how a header can cause lean out that can burn exhaust valves, roast pistons, cause the cat to fail, confuse the ECU. These gurus have no experience arguing the Magnusen – Moss act in front of a lemon law advocate. I’ve seen the VW white papers on chiping for instance. VW has done so much testing to show how a chip causes a tad bit more stress on the engine. You chip a VW and it blows you best be sure the VW engineer with an engineering degree shows up to the advocate with the white paper in hand, while alls the people here will go by is um I read on the internet that the header would NOT void my warranty. Yeah right, sheep to the slaughter. IMO. Young naïve sheep too. Blowing a motor that has a CEL light on due to a race header WILL void your warranty and Toyota will pull the ECU trouble codes when it get towed in can I be more clear?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrowJenkins
Scion tC 2G Owners Lounge
5
Oct 9, 2015 10:47 PM
crimson_sinn
Introduction Forum
1
Sep 25, 2015 09:41 PM
vi3tb0i09
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
2
Sep 23, 2015 08:32 PM
carid
Exclusive Sponsored Sales
0
Aug 31, 2015 11:17 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 PM.