My Turbonetics Dyno Numbers Posted, SUCKED 200WHP
Ya if the cops are that picky i would still do a resenator on the mid pipe. I have spipe, midpipe(no cats or resenator), and trd axel back and its LOUD! Turbo should quiet it down a bit but still might get you harassed.
Hey guys, I don't mean to sound like a dick, but why don't you take all this non-contributing conversation about ZPI numbers to you know, a ZPI thread or something. Turbonetics put down those numbers on a completely stock car except for the kit, but that's for another thread entirely. Others are putting down much higher and more consistent number straight out of the box, so there must be some sort of issue with DTRUONG's car, and I'm sure he'd like that solved ASAP. I'll be watching the thread.
Originally Posted by pollup
I understand dezod has numbers and claim to fame photos of their dyno runs, but thats optimal tuning. i find it hard to believe they pulled 240+ on 8psi still though.
We tuned for 11.5AFRs, and closer to 11 when you get towards 11-12psi. We pulled 4 degrees of ignition timing back. How much safer do you want to go before you start throwing power away and sacrafice spark plugs, etc? Our BASELINE run did make 244whp, and 255wtq (EDIT* that number was with a catalytic converter, a resonator, amd a plumbed wastegate). That's a safe tune to me for 8.7psi. The open dump on the same components yielded a 256whp and 260wtq on a Dynomite. That's closer to 275whp at 8.7psi on a dyno jet.
ANYWAY back to your car man (sorry for being OT)... I know a lot of people are concerned with the peak numbers being so low, but I haven't seen anyone bring up the fact that the powerband is all over the place. It seems to be a serious tuning issue. I know for a fact that under open-loop (WOT), when you hit 5k it dips to the richer side. If you notice, right at 5k theres a big dip in power. This all shows to me you're running excessively rich (prob as rich as 8.5:1 or so, and when you hit 5k rpms it gets even richer. Tune that bad boy to an 11.5 and watch that number hit 250+. If you have anyother questions please let me know.
Originally Posted by Cape_Cod_TC
Hey guys, I don't mean to sound like a dick, but why don't you take all this non-contributing conversation about ZPI numbers to you know, a ZPI thread or something. Turbonetics put down those numbers on a completely stock car except for the kit, but that's for another thread entirely. Others are putting down much higher and more consistent number straight out of the box, so there must be some sort of issue with DTRUONG's car, and I'm sure he'd like that solved ASAP. I'll be watching the thread.
Originally Posted by pollup
Originally Posted by Cape_Cod_TC
Hey guys, I don't mean to sound like a dick, but why don't you take all this non-contributing conversation about ZPI numbers to you know, a ZPI thread or something. Turbonetics put down those numbers on a completely stock car except for the kit, but that's for another thread entirely. Others are putting down much higher and more consistent number straight out of the box, so there must be some sort of issue with DTRUONG's car, and I'm sure he'd like that solved ASAP. I'll be watching the thread.
thank you
Originally Posted by Joe_Dezod
Originally Posted by pollup
I understand dezod has numbers and claim to fame photos of their dyno runs, but thats optimal tuning. i find it hard to believe they pulled 240+ on 8psi still though.
We tuned for 11.5AFRs, and closer to 11 when you get towards 11-12psi. We pulled 4 degrees of ignition timing back. How much safer do you want to go before you start throwing power away and sacrafice spark plugs, etc? Our BASELINE run did make 244whp, and 255wtq (EDIT* that number was with a catalytic converter, a resonator, amd a plumbed wastegate). That's a safe tune to me for 8.7psi. The open dump on the same components yielded a 256whp and 260wtq on a Dynomite. That's closer to 275whp at 8.7psi on a dyno jet.
ANYWAY back to your car man (sorry for being OT)... I know a lot of people are concerned with the peak numbers being so low, but I haven't seen anyone bring up the fact that the powerband is all over the place. It seems to be a serious tuning issue. I know for a fact that under open-loop (WOT), when you hit 5k it dips to the richer side. If you notice, right at 5k theres a big dip in power. This all shows to me you're running excessively rich (prob as rich as 8.5:1 or so, and when you hit 5k rpms it gets even richer. Tune that bad boy to an 11.5 and watch that number hit 250+. If you have anyother questions please let me know.
Ok. GL with the tuner, and let us know how it goes! I really think that's your issue, because the AEM will show 10:1 even if it's richer than that, so I really think that's the issue. At least it's rich and not lean haha, better safe than sorry.
http://turboneticsinc.com/downloads/...eld%20Trip.mov
7:50 into the video
Turbonetics Shop Dyno is a:
Dynapack Dynamometer
http://www.dynapackusa.com/
XS Engineering where that dyno sheet came from, they use a 2wd 1200hp Dynojet 248 chassis dynamometer.
http://www.xs-engineering.com/produc...ter=dynotuning
7:50 into the video
Turbonetics Shop Dyno is a:
Dynapack Dynamometer
http://www.dynapackusa.com/
XS Engineering where that dyno sheet came from, they use a 2wd 1200hp Dynojet 248 chassis dynamometer.
http://www.xs-engineering.com/produc...ter=dynotuning
you're not the only one with lower then expected dyno#. i have a turbonetic kit and my tC dyno at 220HP & 220TQ average, 3 pull total. DYNO IT ON A DYNOJET.
my tC is completely stock minus the turbo kit. A/F was 11.5:1 straight through. Anyway, i will post up my dyno graph tomorrow so you can compare how sh!tty both our dyno# are,
my tC is completely stock minus the turbo kit. A/F was 11.5:1 straight through. Anyway, i will post up my dyno graph tomorrow so you can compare how sh!tty both our dyno# are,
Originally Posted by pollup
consider it done, im out of this thread, too much whining.
Go drive around in your boosted tC and stay out of this thread if you have no intelligent input. Why even bother saying you dont believe Dezod's numbers....you sir are on crack and seriously need to read the forums a bit more.
Def a tuning issue, man saw that chart... wow... your fuel is all over the place is my guess. Also on the DJ, it will only read to about 10:1 and below that it will not read, so you may think your at 10:1 but you could have been well below that which is what it looks like...







