Lol man let's just say it's the opposite now. It says cam position over retard lol. Before it was over advanced. Lol and my exhaust cam lobe is grinded down.

 

i had same same problem... i think the stock cam's are to weak to hand agressive spring's

 

Yes sir.

 

hey carlos got a question, in the engine bay pic, i see the sensor by the throttle body is that the stock maf or a map sensor?

 

That's a stock MAF sensor.

 

Map sensor does not look like the maf sensor.

 

Hows that setup working? Reason I ask is cuz I just finished my custom setup but haven't welded the flange for the maf, if you have the maf there where are you running the map from a vacuum block I'm guessing? Thanks this is the last decision I gotta make

 

15 more whp @12 psi
WTF



Lol. Good numbers guys.
Still makes me jealous

 

Map sensor goes hooked to a vacuum hose and the. Other end to the emanage.

 

yea i figured that, marcelo are you running your setup that way, is it ok even though the maf housing is 3" and my ic pipping is 2.5?

 

A lot of factors can contribute to that 15whp difference at the same psi: health of motor, temperature during dyno session, other modifications, etc.
Nothing to be concern about. The difference is so minimal.

Regards,
Mike @ PTUNING

 

game-over you have a PM.

 

people say when its hooked up to more then 2.75 that the maf will not be accurate so i dunno. pm me any questions

 

Seems like ptuning might be adjusting there dyno for there own turbo kits.. everytime one gets tuned at 12 psi seems the number keep going higher. and higher.

 

^^Why don't you be next...

 

i doubt that

 

^^ do i sniff a hater? lol nice numbers carlos

 

Lol Thanks guys. The numbers dont lie. We will be taking the same number to a facility near by that has a "higher rated" correction factor dyno. Will post more pics later.

 

cant wait to see the result

 

why would i be a hater