Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

TT or dezod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 06:49 AM
  #101  
SoFloTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,104
Default

no its not.. someone already did a list of pricings. the amount of money u spend on the s/c and supporting mods to get near 280 whp u might aswell build ur own custom kit and get tuned with a turbo. and then ull also have more torque.
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #102  
chintastictc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,049
From: Valley Stream, NY
Default

im tired of this s/c vs turbo crap.....s/c= weak sauce!!!!....end of story
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #103  
Gymo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 163
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

TT FTW!!!!!! They get so much hp
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #104  
bone22's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28
From: Savannah, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Gymo
TT FTW!!!!!! They get so much hp
Im in the Army and I deal with a lot of acronyms so please help me out. What is FTW?
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #105  
Gymo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 163
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

FTW=For the win, I didnt know what it meant until like a month ago lol.
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #106  
bone22's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28
From: Savannah, GA
Default

FTW=for the win. I would of neva guessed that.
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #107  
chintastictc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,049
From: Valley Stream, NY
Default

FTMFW= FOR THE ***** FU***N WIN
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #108  
Gymo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 163
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by bone22
FTW=for the win. I would of neva guessed that.
I never did either lol
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 12:23 AM
  #109  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by JrTcs
Originally Posted by SoFloTC
ima laughing my butt off at whoever said those S/
C comments.. bro.. i had intake exhaust and pulley and IM AUTO! and a stock s/c manual beat me by 2-3 cars and hes a good driver. thats pathetic. the s.c would honeslty need that tiny butt 14 psi pulley to even come near a tuned 8 psi turbo (that is a good setup). which is usually 270-290 whp.
lmfao what is turbonetics making at 8.5psi how the f*ck is 9.5 gonna make 300 whp rthymn so 1.5psi is 60 whp lmfao ? where are you getting that? Turbos gain boost s/c constant! btw go ask dezod who builds kits for a living they will tell you if s/c where cheap to build as turbos, turbos wouldnt exist. AnD where are getting that maximum hp is at 3000rpm for a turbo what dyno have you been looking at? BTW didnt the untuned 05 s/c'd tc from scikotics nashville vs the zpi stage 0 and won the first race?


It's clear you don't know what either applications are capable of. It's clear that you don't know that the TRD S/Cer is a Centrifugal type S/Cer. It is clear that you are a noob to SL, at least the F/I section. Bro, I've been here before there was ever a F/I section on this site. How you figure you going to come in here and tell people who have been here and are boosted, what application does what and wins...come on dude. Dezod don't build kits by the way. They sell them, there is a difference.

And JUST an FYI for you about that 311whp on Ice9's S/Cer......It was with Methanol Bro....LOL. Not pure S/C'er. Turbo tC's put that down on 9 - 10 PSI on 93 octane pump gas only.

It won the first race? Bro, you don't get it......The Stage 0 (basic bottom of the barrel kit) on 6 PSI with 3 People in the car, vs a TRD S/Cer with EVERY bolt-on + a 9.5 PSI pulley. And the Stage 0 beat him.

Go back, do your research. You would find that there is perhaps not a single S/C'er only (meaning no nitrous added, methanol) that has ran into the 13's in the 1/4 mile.

The only S/C'ed tC worth mentioning is the Jackson Dawson Race car that is powered by a S/C'er. However its not just a S/Cer either.

Point blank Turbo > S/Cer let it go.
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 12:29 AM
  #110  
SoFloTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,104
Default

^^ game set match.
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #111  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by JrTcs
Originally Posted by kungpaosamuraiii
The supercharger has its place. When you're doing a lot of shifting you lose boost. Not too big a deal but when you're battling for the last tenth or hundredth of a second that little bit more consistency with a supercharger can win it for you.
Finally someone here without the biased review of owning a turbo, all the people that are calling the s/c garbage have turbos therefore what they say is irrelevant, no one is gonna tell you hey my turbo is not as good as your s/c, BTW as said numerous times the issues are at the 05 PTR 01 builds the PTR 41 builds are fine and i havent seen any probs posted on here for that build. I feel that both means of forced induction have there ups and downs you just have to evaluate them both and find a safe and reliable means of reaching the HP your trying to make, BTW im not bashing turbos but have you noticed a S/C hasnt blown an engine on here but turbos lol, we could make a category in the forums for people who blew there motors.

Biased because i have a turbo....right. My boy has a S/C'er. I know what it does. I tell you what, go get a S/cer, and I hope you have fun with that. When a manual tC with I/H/E is door to door with your S/C'er only tC don't come crying on here about how your car is slow.

Saying a S/C'er hasn't blown a motor on here......LOL...that only tells me more that you are a noob to this forum.

And if you ask my boy Rich if he was satisfied with the performance of his S/C'er next to a turbo, he will tell you NO. But he is a good sport and willing to make the best of the kit. He has to add a lot more to his car to be what a basic turbo kit does.

You got bent out of shape because I told the truth, a 14 PSI S/C'ed tC will keep up with a 9 PSI turbo tC. Seeing it winning....I'm still going to put my money on the turbo FTW with the drivers being equal in skill that is.

You beg to differ then prove it.
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 12:41 AM
  #112  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by JrTcs
Originally Posted by scionkidd
Originally Posted by JrTcs
Originally Posted by kungpaosamuraiii
The supercharger has its place. When you're doing a lot of shifting you lose boost. Not too big a deal but when you're battling for the last tenth or hundredth of a second that little bit more consistency with a supercharger can win it for you.
Finally someone here without the biased review of owning a turbo, all the people that are calling the s/c garbage have turbos therefore what they say is irrelevant, no one is gonna tell you hey my turbo is not as good as your s/c, BTW as said numerous times the issues are at the 05 PTR 01 builds the PTR 41 builds are fine and i havent seen any probs posted on here for that build. I feel that both means of forced induction have there ups and downs you just have to evaluate them both and find a safe and reliable means of reaching the HP your trying to make, BTW im not bashing turbos but have you noticed a S/C hasnt blown an engine on here but turbos lol, we could make a category in the forums for people who blew there motors.
Turbo's blow motors because the owner is usually power hungry and their tuning company just want to make their money! and b/c the owner drives the car like a Buthead!

SuperChargers break just because they are not 100% reliable for high HP applications.

Turbo's are completely safe and reliable... all it comes down to is how the driver drives it and how the tuning is performed
I agree with you on the fact its meant for high hp but what im saying is for people looking a reliable means of reaching up to 280 whp on a normal dyno s/c is an excellent option.

No it's not. It is No where near being cost effective bro. I can count on probably 2 fingers the number of S/C'ed tC's making over 260whp. Why....Just not cost effective.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 12:35 AM
  #113  
kungpaosamuraiii's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,726
Default

This sucks. Since everyone's quoting this guy I have the text of him agreeing with me reposted a billion times. *****.

I said superchargers have their place. For like, 95% of people wanting more power - scratch that - for 100% of people who just want more power, turbo is 10 times out of 10 a better choice. It's more efficient and ultimately costs less. Due to the simplicity of turbochargers, especially externally wastegated (ie mostly two hunks of metal with blades and bearings inside) they're very reliable and, made with your average market quality, far less liable to break than a gear driven supercharger (ie the one available for the tC) which means most of the reliability rests on the guy who is doing the tuning. That 'human error' aspect sounds bad but considering you gotta tune a supercharger to max power the risk is equivalent.

The notion that "you have to evaluate and choose for yourself" is true but is a worthless and empty thing to say. Far more telling is all that crap that JrTcs said about power bands and peak power and whatever else. It tells of a lot ignorance. Ignorance isn't a bad thing unless you choose to hold on to it. JrTcs, I suggest you learn more before making these arguments.

I said superchargers have their place. The two I can think of are one, for those who just want a little more power and a warranty that covers their FI car, and two, for those who take part in races that involve a lot of low speed turns, like autocross. Of course, plenty of Evos and STi's and SRT4's do autoX.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 12:41 AM
  #114  
justin6969's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
Team ScionEyed
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 732
Default

when a car gets tuned what do they do just hook a computer up to it and set the settings etc.. im a complete noob about tuning or anything my friend did my turbo on my civic
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 03:45 AM
  #115  
toyota_scion_tc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,458
From: Everywhere
Default

Supercharger takes power away from you engine to make power 7lbs = 192 hp
Turbocharger doens't take power away from your engine it runs off the exhaust most turbos 7lbs = 230hp.

Supercharger = limitations
Turbocharger = no limits!

Enough said.


On topic if you want to see you kit this millennium get Dezod and if you are an extremely patient person and feel like waiting for quality then get TT.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 03:48 AM
  #116  
SoFloTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,104
Default

correction.. most turbo's on our cars will produce over 250 wheel at 7psi and if not.. thats it not that good of a setup.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #117  
paul_dezod's Avatar
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scionetics
KAD
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,936
From: Western NY
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Dezod don't build kits by the way. They sell them, there is a difference.

The only S/C'ed tC worth mentioning is the Jackson Dawson Race car that is powered by a S/C'er. However its not just a S/Cer either.

Point blank Turbo > S/Cer let it go.
Our kits would not exist if it where not for us making them sir.


The JD tC is running a 10 PSI NST S/C Pulley with a TRD IC on our AEM EMS. So really it is a S/C tC running liquid to air ICing.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #118  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by kungpaosamuraiii
The two I can think of are one, for those who just want a little more power and a warranty that covers their FI car, and two, for those who take part in races that involve a lot of low speed turns, like autocross. Of course, plenty of Evos and STi's and SRT4's do autoX.
That is the one place that I said I would use a S/Cer as well, on the AutoX.



Originally Posted by paul_dezod
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Dezod don't build kits by the way. They sell them, there is a difference.

The only S/C'ed tC worth mentioning is the Jackson Dawson Race car that is powered by a S/C'er. However its not just a S/Cer either.

Point blank Turbo > S/Cer let it go.
Our kits would not exist if it where not for us making them sir.


The JD tC is running a 10 PSI NST S/C Pulley with a TRD IC on our AEM EMS. So really it is a S/C tC running liquid to air ICing.


Let me clarify for you in what I was saying. By "building" kits, I'm talking....doing your own welding on the manifolds, welding pipes, installing kits, getting dirty. Unless you guys acquired a welding setup I didn't know about, not to long ago, and you have physical hands in your office stamping out stuff, then I stand corrected. If not, then I don't consider you as "building" kits. Just my opinion, no intention on insulting your business. Just keep making money, that's what you do best. Like can somone drive to your place and you hand build them a kit from scratch?

As for the comment about the JD car. It's a Race Car, completely gutted, shaved hundreds of lbs from, running a S/C'er with a Stand Alone Fuel Management system and a Liquid-Air intercooler setup. That to me is not a S/C'er only or Average S/C'er setup nor can it be compared to any S/C'er on these forums. A highly modded S/C'er on these forums and in the street world is a S/C'er with an upgraded pulley, and all the bolt-ons you can put on it. That's considered a modded S/C'er in the normal peoples hands. And we all know it gets trounced by a lower PSI pushing turbo equipped tC.

And it's no brain surgery that if the JD tC left all in place except the S/C'er, and ran a turbo on 10 PSI instead, that it would be twice as fast.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #119  
paul_dezod's Avatar
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scionetics
KAD
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,936
From: Western NY
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke

Let me clarify for you in what I was saying. By "building" kits, I'm talking....doing your own welding on the manifolds, welding pipes, installing kits, getting dirty. Unless you guys acquired a welding setup I didn't know about, not to long ago, and you have physical hands in your office stamping out stuff, then I stand corrected. If not, then I don't consider you as "building" kits. Just my opinion, no intention on insulting your business. Just keep making money, that's what you do best. Like can somone drive to your place and you hand build them a kit from scratch?
Yes we have full welding/fab capabilities and have a Lincoln TIG machine in house. My personal beads right here:


We can build something custom with the proper lead times and the proper $$ to compensate for time and effort. However, we don't have a ton of man power to blow on stuff like that.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 04:45 PM
  #120  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

^^Ok, I stand corrected. Good job. How long have you guys had the gear?



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 PM.