Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

Twin Charge TC ! Update .... coming soon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #21  
brett561tc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,773
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

do you have a link for these other s/c? and are they direct bolt on units made for the tc?
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #22  
Garage1217's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member


SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,980
From: Phoenix, Az
Default

Definitly not direct bolt on units, they are SC manufacturers. If they can make a top mount header like mine, they sure as heck have the fab skills to make brackets and mounts for any type of SC they want
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:05 PM
  #23  
Garage1217's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member


SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,980
From: Phoenix, Az
Default

Here are some ogura chargers, They are my charger of choice. Talk about freakin INSTANT boost. And they sound like a freakin f1 engine when pushed.

http://www.oguraclutch.co.jp/english...c/sc_siyou.htm
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #24  
Nick06tC's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,277
From: Andersen AFB, Guam
Default

Deffinetly interesting, but deffinetly not intended for a manufactured application.

This is something someone does because they can, no so they can mas produce it. It can actually be done with 2 bought kits, its the tunning that would be come the issue. All it is, is a TRD Supercharger, with a turbo kit plummed in. Add an amazing tune with boost controllers to give you the correct boost levels to keep a consistent amount of boost going.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #25  
Garage1217's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member


SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,980
From: Phoenix, Az
Default

Well the idea of twincharging is the sc makes power down low and then shuts down, the intake air is bypassed to the turbo once it reaches x psi and it takes over. All this has to happen instantly so there is a seamless transition between the two.

Not both making boost at the same time, that is pointless.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #26  
brett561tc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,773
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

a much easier setup that would yeild the same results is spraying nitrous to spool the turbo.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #27  
nytlemgr's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 342
From: San Diego, CA
Default

watching.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #28  
Nick06tC's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,277
From: Andersen AFB, Guam
Default

Originally Posted by Garage1217
Well the idea of twincharging is the sc makes power down low and then shuts down, the intake air is bypassed to the turbo once it reaches x psi and it takes over. All this has to happen instantly so there is a seamless transition between the two.

Not both making boost at the same time, that is pointless.
Thats what i was trying to get at.
But like you pointed out early, add in a centrifigal cupercharger that makes no boost down low, to a turbo that doesnt spool until 3000 RPMS. And this all seems like it would have the same result as a large turbo making ALOT of boost up high.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #29  
Garage1217's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member


SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,980
From: Phoenix, Az
Default

Agreed, with todays advanced turbo technology... not a huge need for twincharging anymore, but still if it is done right it is freakin COOL. An old buddy named Robert of Forced air technologies here in the valley did a twincharged STI with an m62 eaton. Did a bang up job on fab, never sure if get got everything ironed out or not.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #30  
Garage1217's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member


SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,980
From: Phoenix, Az
Default

Originally Posted by Nick06tC
Originally Posted by Garage1217
Well the idea of twincharging is the sc makes power down low and then shuts down, the intake air is bypassed to the turbo once it reaches x psi and it takes over. All this has to happen instantly so there is a seamless transition between the two.

Not both making boost at the same time, that is pointless.
Thats what i was trying to get at.
But like you pointed out early, add in a centrifigal cupercharger that makes no boost down low, to a turbo that doesnt spool until 3000 RPMS. And this all seems like it would have the same result as a large turbo making ALOT of boost up high.

Exactly except with the parasitic loss of the supercharger still pulling on the motor.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #31  
engifineer's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,731
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

This is what I was trying to say before. An eaton/roots type charger produces boost in a much more linear fashion, so you start creating power right off the bat and it builds steadilly rather than spiking up like a turbo does. The idea is to make the power curve of a turbo more desireable. With todays setups and the amount of power you will practically run in the tC, there is zero need for it.

The roots chargers may more difficult on our engine due to the intake mani placement being behind the motor.

But, like we said, using a centrifugal unit for this defeats most of the purpose, which is why I wanted to see an actual power curve for it. I expect it will look just like a turbos power curve, in which case a simple turbo kit would get you the same effect other than the "cool" factor.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #32  
Nick06tC's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,277
From: Andersen AFB, Guam
Default

Now an STI would be a good thing. There lag is BAD, a roots type up top with a stock turbo, would be amazing.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:34 PM
  #33  
JPsTc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
1UP Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,532
Default

That looks pretty crazy, im watching
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #34  
TwinChargeTC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 85
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Hello everyone! Thanks for reading our post. For some of you who have seen our work, YES...our first build was the BMW Mini Cooper S Twin Charge (aka the "TWINI"). We built it originally to address turbo lag and take advantage of the immediate power of the supercharger. That Mini turned out to be the fastest Mini in the world!!

With that in mind, we decided to continue that concept with the TC. Yes, to be unique, and also hopefully to perform as well as the TWINI. I understand some points of view that it's a novelty, but if we have results anything similar to the TWINI, than I think we've done an exceptional job at building something unique and performance oriented.

The power curve is very interesting indeed and without spoiling the feature that will be released, I can only say that it's going to please many, if not all of us. We've already released the results to Scion and TRD, our main sponsors in this build. And by the way, the results you'll see are on a completely STOCK motor. After we reach maximum output, we'll be installing a rebuilt motor that will be able to fully utilize the HKS GT40 turbo we've installed !! Yes....some might use the word "sick" to describe this. We prefer "WICKED!"

If anyone is interested, I can let you know what parts we've used and who's been involved in the project. But for now, that's probably the most I can say.

by the way...the torque is way beyond even what we expected out of this $16K TC that we received!!!



TEAM ATI
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #35  
riboflavin's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,253
From: Millbrae, CA
Default

watching
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 11:29 PM
  #36  
bkuhl's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 780
From: Clovis, NM
Default

Originally Posted by TwinChargeTC
Yes....some might use the word "sick" to describe this. We prefer "WICKED!"
How about "WICKED sick"


>.>

<.<

No? Pah!
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 01:34 AM
  #37  
tCUZZ's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
DelMarVa
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 88
Default

How about "WICKED sick"
wicked sick FTW!!!!
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 01:37 AM
  #38  
318_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,534
Default

You have to atleast be making 500+tq to be "WICKED" and thats almost hard to believe on stock block.
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 01:43 AM
  #39  
olaHalo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,191
From: @ home
Default

Originally Posted by nytlemgr
watching.
great way to boost your post count.
type watching in every thread
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 01:50 AM
  #40  
amdforever's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,319
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by olaHalo
Originally Posted by nytlemgr
watching.
great way to boost your post count.
type watching in every thread
Never pictured you as a smart@ss when I met you at the meet the other night



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 AM.