View Poll Results: Who will win?
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll
s/c ts vs. srt-4? that's right icetc i'm talking to you.....
#1
s/c ts vs. srt-4? that's right icetc i'm talking to you.....
so what about it? how do you think your s/c tc is going to hold up to my skittle? And everyone else vote for the winner.....
we'll post up the results from etown whenever he gets his car done........
we'll post up the results from etown whenever he gets his car done........
#7
Originally Posted by 06siHubby
The SRT4 is a monster of a machine. Horrible interior and suspension isent much to be desired. But that engine is nice.
Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent multilink
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
60-0 braking distance : 120 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.85 g
tc:
Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent double wishbone
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
60-0 braking distance : 125 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.81 g
so how does our suspension suck again?
#8
Originally Posted by Blue_TC_Man
The srt-4 should win if the tranny can stay together
this wasn't meant to be a neon-bashing thread because you people obviously have no clue and serious misconceptions about the neons and what they can handle and are capable of. this is only a question between two friends that will go down the track side by side soon enough.....
#9
Originally Posted by Crayola_G
is icetC the guy putting down 310whp on a s/c set up...than the icetC
#10
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Andersen AFB, Guam
Posts: 5,277
The SRT4 will murder a supercharged tC everyday, all day even if they miss a gear. I am not saying it hasnt been done, but no one has EVER posted a supercharged time that is better than a 14.7, and I did a 14.7. And on street tires dont think I could do anybetter. That was putting 227whp to the ground at 9.5 PSI.
I think the fastest supercharged tC was also spraying n02 and hit a 13.9, still wouldnt beet a srt-4.
I do not like the srt-4 one bit, but I also cannot deny the fact that they are beasts and have some of the highest potential of ANY car in its class!!
I think the fastest supercharged tC was also spraying n02 and hit a 13.9, still wouldnt beet a srt-4.
I do not like the srt-4 one bit, but I also cannot deny the fact that they are beasts and have some of the highest potential of ANY car in its class!!
#11
[quote="psi_chick"]
I will tell you the same thing I tell my friend... at the end of the day it's still a neon! That being the case, my money is on the SRT-4.
Originally Posted by Blue_TC_Man
you people obviously have no clue and serious misconceptions about the neons and what they can handle and are capable of.
#12
Originally Posted by psi_chick
Originally Posted by 06siHubby
The SRT4 is a monster of a machine. Horrible interior and suspension isent much to be desired. But that engine is nice.
Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent multilink
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
60-0 braking distance : 120 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.85 g
tc:
Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent double wishbone
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
60-0 braking distance : 125 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.81 g
so how does our suspension suck again?
#13
well, the tc just isn't built for setting blistering acceleration times, i mean, you have to shift twice just to get to 60. and also, turbochargers are just more efficient than superchargers since they make more power, while the supercharger only builds power until redline.
#14
so i finally found this thread...btw i am not the one making 311 whp from my s/c...as of right now ironically my tc is in the shop for what??? a scraping 3rd gear and my tranny is being replaced...that said i've been hanging around with this hear srt-4 for a while and i'm pretty boost addicted wanted to go turbo (don't boost on a budget) but don't have the funds wish i woulda bought a neon after meeting certain people and to answer the question no...i do not thing my tc will hold up
(btw i voted for the neon)
(btw i voted for the neon)
#16
Originally Posted by psi_chick
Originally Posted by Blue_TC_Man
The srt-4 should win if the tranny can stay together
this wasn't meant to be a neon-bashing thread because you people obviously have no clue and serious misconceptions about the neons and what they can handle and are capable of. this is only a question between two friends that will go down the track side by side soon enough.....
#17
Originally Posted by psi_chick
Originally Posted by 06siHubby
The SRT4 is a monster of a machine. Horrible interior and suspension isent much to be desired. But that engine is nice.
Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent multilink
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
60-0 braking distance : 120 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.85 g
tc:
Suspension : F - Independent MacPherson strut
R - Independent double wishbone
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
60-0 braking distance : 125 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.81 g
so how does our suspension suck again?
btw im watching
of course... srt4 will win.. s/c has no chance.. if it would be turboed.. thats a different story...
#18
Originally Posted by Blue_TC_Man
is that aftermarket, cause i've seen more srt-4's throw tranny fluid down a track more than any other car. I;m not bashing the srt-4 at all its the only Chrysler car I would drive. They just have a weak tranny for there power from what ive seen
#19
Originally Posted by CSOCSO
hm... so how srt4's perform in autoX???
0-60
BMW - 5.1
NEON- 5.7
1/4 mile
BMW - 13.4@107mph
NEON - 13.9@105mph
Lap Times
BMW on average 0.15 sec quicker, 0.12 mph faster.
Price:
BMW - $55,840
NEON - $23,335
so how does your tc compare?????????