Notices
Scion tC 1G Suspension & Handling Coilovers, Shocks, Airbags, Swaybars...

Coilover Spring Rates Confusing

Old Jul 9, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #1  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default Coilover Spring Rates Confusing

I am looking for coilovers for my tc. ive been looking at adjustability, spring rates, etc etc.... one thing i noticed is with our cars that the rear spring rates are usually stiffer to help correct the understeer and make the car more neutral. spring rates are shown sometimes in (kg) or in lb/in... just for reference -- 1kgf/mm = 56 lb/in


stock springs are 2.7kg front 4.5kg rear (150/250) ... ok
tein coilovers are 7kg front 10 kg rear (329/559) ok...
progress coilovers are 4.5kg front 6.3kg read (250/350) .. normal

now.. ksport and megan are different...

megan coils are 8kg up front 5kg in rear (448/280) ... stiffer then teins in the front but barely over stock int the rear... doesnt make sense..

ksport coils are 6kg front 3kg rear (336/16 ... SOFTER the stock in the rear???

if the megans were 5/8 and the ksport were 3/6 ... this would make more sense. i was really considering megan coilovers for my tc but now im really confused as to why the spring rates are this way. can anyone help me out ?? thanks!
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 01:48 AM
  #2  
ptang's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 225
From: Milpitas
Default

i was thinking the same thing too..
maybe it has something to do with over/under steer?
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 01:51 AM
  #3  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default

it would cause more understeer which would be bad for our car since giving it more oversteer would make it neutral..
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
2redgerm6's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 342
From: Orlando, FL
Default

megan has been haveing problems with the rear. k-sport i'm thinking it may be a typo.
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 07:03 PM
  #5  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default MEGAN RACING EMAIL

email from megan racing--

Hi,
We are updating the rear suspensions, so info will be changed later.
Most
cars have softer on the back, only some have stiffer on back, because
the
engine is in front and front needs higher spring rates to support, but
some
cars like RSX, then they need higher on the back due to body set up.


Thanks

....

who knows...
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #6  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default

anyone on ksports spring rates?
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 01:57 AM
  #7  
lightwarp's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Default

there is one simple explanation... they had different R&D team :lol different goal or different paycheck
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 02:11 AM
  #8  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by lightwarp
there is one simple explanation... they had different R&D team :lol different goal or different paycheck
im not sure what you mean
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 02:11 AM
  #9  
5GeorgiaBoi5's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 162
Default

So the stiffer the spring rates the better? When I mean better I mean like handling wise I couldn't careless about the comfort side.

Also is the Tanabe sustec pro o 2 closet thing to the ssp spring rate wise?

Tanabe Sustec Pro S-OC Type II - ~$879 (3/8"-2"F/ 3/8"-2 3/8"R) (336 lb/in F/ 448 lb/in R)


Tein ss-p - ~$779 (1.4"-2.7"F/1.4"-2.6"R) (392 lb/in F/ 559 lb/in R
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 02:15 AM
  #10  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default

better handling i guess. it is harder to compress so you can put more turning force on it.. but then you have to have good tires to grip.. if you drive everyday streets.. teins will make you feel every bumb and kill your liver but if you were to get like progress coils.. they arent much stiffer than stock..
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #11  
OuterHeaven's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 627
From: Plano, TX
Default

As to why we have stiffer springs in the rear may be due to just how our suspension geometry works for the front and rear. With a coil/strut at a non-direct angle will have a different effective stiffness on the wheel movement compared to one being perpendicular. Also how far away it is from a pivot point may change the effective stiffness on the actual wheel movement.
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #12  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default

im tryint to find out why 2 coilover manufacturers chose to make the rears softer then the fronts
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #13  
5GeorgiaBoi5's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 162
Default

Ok after watching a touge video on the internet I was looking at a integra (first car in this video) and the fronts were stiffer than the rear also... so I just thought this was interesting.. Check below for video.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V1FOf9Kwro&search=touge
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 02:58 AM
  #14  
carlb28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 99
Default

ksport 6kgf/mm front 9kgf/mm rear.. pretty close to teins
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #15  
Otocan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 760
From: Maryland USA
Default

this is a very good question, and I unfortunately don't know enough about certain suspension components to answer it.

I do know that if you have a car corner weighted and have springs specifically manufactured the spring rate is a direct correlation to the amount of weight on the wheel, and the more weight, the stiffer the spring needs to be to support it. Also the stiffer the spring the more it affects handling like oversteer and understeer and also makes you skip off the proper line in a turn if you start hitting bumps, which would be very dangerous on the streets.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 01:04 PM
  #16  
tcengel's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 879
Default

Good Info:

Now, if I subscribed to autocross suspension theory I would choose rates equal to roughly half the static weight on each corner.

Some quick, ballpark estimates...

TC = ~2900 lbs.
Front = 1740 lbs.
Rear = 1160 lbs.

Front tires, individually = 870 lbs.
Rear tires, individually = 580 lbs.

Obviously these numbers aren't exact, fuel load and driver screws it all up. But since I'm not going for *perfection* there can be a little slack.

So I need ~435 lb. front springs and 290 lb. rear springs.
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 07:51 AM
  #17  
llgotscionll's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 75
From: San Francisco / San Jose
Default

i have the ground control coilovers. can someone tell me what these numbers mean:

gc front# 150.64.53
gc rear# 180.77.61
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danielv
PPC: Misc and Lots
15
Aug 26, 2015 07:14 PM
ganyon
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Suspension & Handling
12
Mar 31, 2015 03:58 AM
fluxingnation
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
1
Dec 26, 2014 04:28 PM
ScionVan
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Suspension & Handling
11
Dec 2, 2003 09:37 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15 PM.