Req: Aggressive wheel stance pics
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,373
From: WORLD WIDE Flossin
Yeah that should be on point if my #s are right. I was using ktothesass's car to estimate. I'm a visual person so I hope he doesn't mind me using his pic:
That's how the 9.5" sits with a 35 offset and no spacers. And using the offset calculator, that set up is 42mm further out than stock. The 9" are 35mm further out than stock so to make up for that 7mm difference is where the spacers come in.
That's how the 9.5" sits with a 35 offset and no spacers. And using the offset calculator, that set up is 42mm further out than stock. The 9" are 35mm further out than stock so to make up for that 7mm difference is where the spacers come in.
needless to say, spacers coming and/or new wheels
hey! i actually like these headlights! the cut off is great and i think they look pretty damn good.
plus im getting a set of STI projectors (for free) and im gonna attempt to retro them into these
plus im getting a set of STI projectors (for free) and im gonna attempt to retro them into these
Senior Member
Trader
SL Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,188
From: 954! oh yeah...
i ended up taking off the upper bumper/fender tab completely off and making 2 small holes closer to the outer fender wall and using zip ties, MUCH BETTER, no more SCCREEEEECHCHHHCHCH, on dips on the road!
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 288
Dont Forget about me now. My favorite and only good looking pic.
The specs are 17x9 et14 with 205/45 falken 512s in the front and in the rear they are Drum Roll, Please.............. 17x11 et12with 235/45 falken 512s.
I think i could have easily pulled off 17x9 et0 though in the front with camber. Right now i have -3 in front and it sunk in too much even with my set up. Maybe ill add a spacer or something. And I shouldn't have pulled my rear fenders at all. They would have fit easily with enough camber. With my pulled fenders though i can probably fit et0 back there also
, lol. Anyone equivalent or close to my set up? Let me know please.
Also heres a new addition to my collection:
The specs are 17x9 et14 with 205/45 falken 512s in the front and in the rear they are Drum Roll, Please.............. 17x11 et12with 235/45 falken 512s.
I think i could have easily pulled off 17x9 et0 though in the front with camber. Right now i have -3 in front and it sunk in too much even with my set up. Maybe ill add a spacer or something. And I shouldn't have pulled my rear fenders at all. They would have fit easily with enough camber. With my pulled fenders though i can probably fit et0 back there also
, lol. Anyone equivalent or close to my set up? Let me know please. Also heres a new addition to my collection:
whats low et? 15-25??
mines are +38 which i dont consider low offset, but the width puts them out there, stock adjustments in the rear, and my F&F camber plates in the front
for the rear you definitely dont need a camber kit, for the front, depending on how low you go, you might need a camber kit, you can either buy coils with top camber plates (F&F, Tein SSP, Ksport) theres others too, or you can buy camber bolts, they work great too!
mines are +38 which i dont consider low offset, but the width puts them out there, stock adjustments in the rear, and my F&F camber plates in the front
for the rear you definitely dont need a camber kit, for the front, depending on how low you go, you might need a camber kit, you can either buy coils with top camber plates (F&F, Tein SSP, Ksport) theres others too, or you can buy camber bolts, they work great too!
This info gave me a good idea. Thanks. Yes i was thinking 32 or a 27 offset. So the Tc doesnt come with factory camber then?
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,725
nvm about the equivalence.. lol damn.. i didn't know you went that crazy on the rear.. shhhhhhhiiiiiiiii