Descendant tC2 Turbo Video
2 Attachment(s)
I figured some of the new tC2 people would enjoy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xUdPhUn_g8 See you at SEMA! Attachment 72005 333WHP & 302TQ Attachment 72006 |
Good stuff, Rob!
I think the tC2 is going to be a hit at SEMA. Can't wait to order my tC2 in January...better late than never I supppose. :icon_headphones: |
sexy!:love:
|
Nice video. Did that car put down 200 whp stock? What is scion claiming at the crank with the new engine. I haven't even looked yet.
Nevermind, just looked it up, the rated it at 180hp and a whopping 10.4:1 compression. Holy ____! |
2 Attachment(s)
Scion rates the car at 180 but when we tested it at Church's Automotive on his DYNOPAK system and it made 198whp & 197tq and at after we boosted it at 8-9 psi it made 333whp & 302tq
STOCK... Attachment 71944 TURBO... Attachment 71945 |
awesome power on just 8-9psi
|
Do you think the tC2 can make 350whp safely?
__________________ |
Like the design drawing. When will the spoiler be fabed. Holding out on buying a spoiler because I didn't like the lip spoiler option.
|
I have to admit im overwhelmed by the numbers put down but i guess chalk it up to a slightly larger engine and high comp. Nice work guys!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Superpickel
(Post 3708504)
Like the design drawing. When will the spoiler be fabed. Holding out on buying a spoiler because I didn't like the lip spoiler option.
|
stop with the teasers, we want full coverage lol!
|
Originally Posted by tcturbo07
(Post 3708451)
Do you think the tc2 can make 350whp safely?
|
i got a chance to drive a second gen, customer of mine just got one and brought it over, i absolutly hate the clutch. its way way too soft and peddle has too much play in it.
|
I think the reason the stock dyno numbers are so high is Dynapack I'm not saying that Scion did not underate engine just that it may be 10-15hp less.because Dynapack read off the hub so its always a tiny bit higher. Only reason I like Mustang Dynos better is Mustang Dyno's require you
to manually enter vehicle weight and environmental conditions. Therefore either inflating or deflating dyno numbers are possible. The real benefit to the Mustang type Dynos are their ability to put a load on the car and as others have said, simulate real world driving conditions for tuning purposes. ______ |
Originally Posted by rwdjones07
(Post 3709036)
i think the reason the stock dyno numbers are so high is dyno pack im not saying that scion didnot underate engine just that it may be 10-15hp less.because dyno pack read off the hub so its always a tiny bit higher...Only reason i like mustang dynos better is Mustang dyno's require you to manually enter vehicle weight and environmental conditions. Therefore either inflating or deflating dyno numbers are possible. The real benefit to the Mustang type dynos are their ability to put a load on the car and as others have said, simulate real world driving conditions for tuning purposes.
Ahh, you must work for Mustang? :) |
Naw I've just been around a lot tuned cars..and different Dynos..:icon_smile: and different drivetrain losses.
I prefer Dynojets...over either _____ |
Isnt the higher compression worse for boosted applications though?
|
Originally Posted by johnhawkins
(Post 3709073)
Isnt the higher compression worse for boosted applications though?
if the person doesn't know what they are doing.which is no where near the case here....Great job, Rob and Descendant, very good. I just wanna say this made my want to actually buy a 2011 tC. This and the Five Axis Lip Kit will be buying in 6 months after ankle heals. I know I'll be a happy customer :biggrin: ______ |
Originally Posted by johnhawkins
(Post 3709073)
Isnt the higher compression worse for boosted applications though?
For example...our best & most power full 4 cylinder race motors run 13:1 compression on methanol @ 80psi of boost. |
Originally Posted by rwdjones07
(Post 3709100)
GREAT JOB ROB AND DESCENDANT VERY GOOD I JUST WANNA SAY THIS MADE MY WANT TO ACTUALLY BUY A 2011 TC
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:51 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands