Notices
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

import racer dyno......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2004, 07:00 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
empleh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hawaii at heart, L.A. in
Posts: 331
Default import racer dyno......

they dyno'ed an xB with magnaflow exhaust first. the baseline with the exhaust was 102 hp, and 101 tq i think. then they put on the AEM intake and the DC header. after both of those, it ended up at 105hp and 103 tq. bleh.
empleh is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 07:22 PM
  #2  
Banned
SL Member
 
Tamago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,106
Default

goes to show.. forced induction is really the only thing you should put your money toward engine/wise on the 1.5.. it's just too damn small to bother with
Tamago is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 06:11 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
djct_watt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,322
Default

to the wheels??????? what what what?
djct_watt is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 02:32 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
GloriousMidget's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Yukon, Oklahoma
Posts: 434
Default

that's depressing...
GloriousMidget is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 06:04 PM
  #5  
Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
WAFFLES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by CivicEater
goes to show.. forced induction is really the only thing you should put your money toward engine/wise on the 1.5.. it's just too damn small to bother with
It's not necessarily that it's too small. It's that it is pretty efficient in stock trim. If an intake and a header only yields 3hp, then that tells me that the factory intake system and exaust manifold are pretty efficient in the first place.

For N/A there are other ways to go. Of course I would start with bolt-ons first, but they aren't going to do a whole lot for an internally stock engine. The engine already has 10.5:1 compression. If you were to mill the head enough to achieve 11.5:1 compression, and have your stock cam reground to a more aggressive profile, I'm sure power througout the rev range. mmmmm I'm thinking about some GSX-R Suzuki individual throttle bodies. That would be nice, and I bet the addition of a lightened flywheel would really make this small engine come to life.
WAFFLES is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 07:36 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
hotbox05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Posts: 13,706
Default

yeah i'm gonna do the lightened flywheel and crank pulley soon.
hotbox05 is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 07:56 PM
  #7  
Banned
SL Member
 
Tamago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,106
Default

Originally Posted by WAFFLES
Originally Posted by CivicEater
goes to show.. forced induction is really the only thing you should put your money toward engine/wise on the 1.5.. it's just too damn small to bother with
It's not necessarily that it's too small. It's that it is pretty efficient in stock trim. If an intake and a header only yields 3hp, then that tells me that the factory intake system and exaust manifold are pretty efficient in the first place.

For N/A there are other ways to go. Of course I would start with bolt-ons first, but they aren't going to do a whole lot for an internally stock engine. The engine already has 10.5:1 compression. If you were to mill the head enough to achieve 11.5:1 compression, and have your stock cam reground to a more aggressive profile, I'm sure power througout the rev range. mmmmm I'm thinking about some GSX-R Suzuki individual throttle bodies. That would be nice, and I bet the addition of a lightened flywheel would really make this small engine come to life.
you are 100% correct.

but the smaller displacement already making 108HP means it will take quite a bit to get any decent gains.

anyone pull the head and port/flowmatch yet?
Tamago is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 08:08 PM
  #8  
Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
WAFFLES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 53
Default

I would like to, but I'm waiting to crack the engine open after the warranty is done. I'm sure a good valve job and cleaning up the ports a little bit would free up some power. I'm curious to see the quality of the casting of the head.

Any pics of the rotating parts?
WAFFLES is offline  
Old 11-30-2004, 06:34 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
parkyboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 101
Default

i like how all the xb owners give a positive reason, saying that our cars are "efficient with stock trim", while everyone else would just say that our cars are slow and the aftermarket products for the xb suck.
parkyboi is offline  
Old 11-30-2004, 02:27 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
romhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 15
Default

a simple explination is, its all relative %
if you have a stock 200hp car a CAI will probably give you 4-6 hp more.
where 100hp would give you 2-3 more hp.
its a loooooong hill to climb
romhog is offline  
Old 11-30-2004, 06:34 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Black_RSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 131
Default

I think for both the xB and xA that intakes and exhaust or more for a little "feel" of power and sound than actual performance.

I still think they are both good mods..
Black_RSX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
user9430961
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Aero & Exterior
3
09-24-2015 01:09 PM
jdmautoimports
Regional - Canada
0
09-24-2015 04:00 AM
wayneside
Regional - Southeast
0
09-23-2015 10:42 AM
wayneside
Regional - Pacific Northwest
0
09-23-2015 10:29 AM
edwinisdumb15
Regional - Pacific South
3
09-18-2015 10:48 PM



Quick Reply: import racer dyno......



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 PM.