a true rear sway bar
Thread Starter
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Originally Posted by hornet_on_flower
i know how real sway bars work, but what and how does a rear beam axle stiffeners
actualy work
need to get me ed-u-ma-cated on that one
actualy work
need to get me ed-u-ma-cated on that one
Ok ... I will give this a shot ....
The difference between the rear axle stiffener and chassis mounted sway bar is just the difference between the suspension travel and the axle, or the suspension travel and the chassis.
The "sway bar" simply tries to reduce the difference in travel from each side of the car. As the left side moves up, the torsion of the sway bar slows the upward movement and tries to move the right side up to reduce the torsion of the sway bar.
The axle mounted sway bar attempt to keep the torsion equal on both side of the car in relation to the axle. The axle may or may not be aligned with the chassis at any given time. The chassis mounted sway bar attempt to keep the torsion equal on both side of the car in relation to the chassis. This type of configuration also helps to keep the axle more aligned to the chassis. True axle alignment is done through a panhard rod configuration.
The front sway bar follows the same rules.
I hope this helps.
The difference between the rear axle stiffener and chassis mounted sway bar is just the difference between the suspension travel and the axle, or the suspension travel and the chassis.
The "sway bar" simply tries to reduce the difference in travel from each side of the car. As the left side moves up, the torsion of the sway bar slows the upward movement and tries to move the right side up to reduce the torsion of the sway bar.
The axle mounted sway bar attempt to keep the torsion equal on both side of the car in relation to the axle. The axle may or may not be aligned with the chassis at any given time. The chassis mounted sway bar attempt to keep the torsion equal on both side of the car in relation to the chassis. This type of configuration also helps to keep the axle more aligned to the chassis. True axle alignment is done through a panhard rod configuration.
The front sway bar follows the same rules.
I hope this helps.
On a swinging beam rear axle like on the xB, an axle stiffener and a separately-mounted sway bar are functionally equivelent.
The only difference is that the axle stiffener passes its load to the stock axle pivots while the separately-mounted sway bar passes its load to separate pivots mounted to the chassis.
The separate sway bar might work a bit better due to reduction in flexing of the axle pivots, but the tradeoff is a great increase in complexity (four to six pivots added, versus zero for the stiffener).
My feeling is that a stronger stabilizing effect could be had with less weight and complexity by simply boxing in the existing crossmember with sheet metal. Of course, this wouldn't look nearly as kewl as a bunch of add-on hardware!
George
The only difference is that the axle stiffener passes its load to the stock axle pivots while the separately-mounted sway bar passes its load to separate pivots mounted to the chassis.
The separate sway bar might work a bit better due to reduction in flexing of the axle pivots, but the tradeoff is a great increase in complexity (four to six pivots added, versus zero for the stiffener).
My feeling is that a stronger stabilizing effect could be had with less weight and complexity by simply boxing in the existing crossmember with sheet metal. Of course, this wouldn't look nearly as kewl as a bunch of add-on hardware!
George
Thread Starter
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Because the suspension IS NOT tied into the frame, per say, this produces the "body roll", and only a proper rear sway bar can do this. Not a beam stiffner.
Originally Posted by George
My feeling is that a stronger stabilizing effect could be had with less weight and complexity by simply boxing in the existing crossmember with sheet metal. Of course, this wouldn't look nearly as kewl as a bunch of add-on hardware!
George
George
Here is an article that our engineer wrote about the hollow vs. solid sway bars.
http://www.hotchkistuning.com/bin/Mi...SwayTech-D.pdf
Hope this helps you out.
http://www.hotchkistuning.com/bin/Mi...SwayTech-D.pdf
Hope this helps you out.
Thread Starter
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Ok, I was under the xB on saturday, looking and taking some measurements. I now know why there isn't a true rear sway bar.
One of the reason, the frame is too far away from the rear beam to be effective. The distance would kill any effectiveness. To be effective, it will add way too much weight to the car. And one of the big reasons, the gas tank is also in the way.
One of the reason, the frame is too far away from the rear beam to be effective. The distance would kill any effectiveness. To be effective, it will add way too much weight to the car. And one of the big reasons, the gas tank is also in the way.
i don't think boxing the rear would be a good choice...
you would have to box the whole thing, including around the corners.
if you did not box the whole thing it would get stress cracks at the end of the boxed in area....
boxing it in would virtually make it unbendable...not good for handling. it does need to flex some...
you would have to box the whole thing, including around the corners.
if you did not box the whole thing it would get stress cracks at the end of the boxed in area....
boxing it in would virtually make it unbendable...not good for handling. it does need to flex some...
Originally Posted by dgHotLava
i don't think boxing the rear would be a good choice...
you would have to box the whole thing, including around the corners.
if you did not box the whole thing it would get stress cracks at the end of the boxed in area....
boxing it in would virtually make it unbendable...not good for handling. it does need to flex some...
you would have to box the whole thing, including around the corners.
if you did not box the whole thing it would get stress cracks at the end of the boxed in area....
boxing it in would virtually make it unbendable...not good for handling. it does need to flex some...
i'm trying to remember my VW 's...
i think the VW is a smaller axle. so it might suit that better....
our rear beam has a pretty wide opening...boxing that in might be too much....
please check and let us know...
i think the VW is a smaller axle. so it might suit that better....
our rear beam has a pretty wide opening...boxing that in might be too much....
please check and let us know...
Thread Starter
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
I agree, boxing the xB rear beam would make it too rigid, and who knows what problems w/ fatigue on other parts of the car it will effect.
The only real solution, remove spare tire and add a nice 15 gallon fuel cell in the rear area, and add a four link rear suspension.
The only real solution, remove spare tire and add a nice 15 gallon fuel cell in the rear area, and add a four link rear suspension.
Originally Posted by squirrel
I agree, boxing the xB rear beam would make it too rigid, and who knows what problems w/ fatigue on other parts of the car it will effect.
The only real solution, remove spare tire and add a nice 15 gallon fuel cell in the rear area, and add a four link rear suspension.
The only real solution, remove spare tire and add a nice 15 gallon fuel cell in the rear area, and add a four link rear suspension.
but make it a 20 gallon and a true 4-link not a 4-bar setup...
thats a good mod...







