How fast is this box?
#4
if its turbo, then i guess it would go faster than a stock xb since ur prolly talking about 130 to 140 or so hp compared to the stock 108 hp. but with most of all the other stuff (excluding turbo) they only provide minimal hp which is pretty much the stock hp being freed up. it will just be quicker to go as fast as the stocks seeing that these are not race cars.
#7
$6K will get you a lot. The blitz supercharger is $3k, you could do that, an exhaust, header, and intake for a little over $4k in parts. I don't know much about engines, but I imagine you could do a swap for that much. It's not going to be a racecar ever, but you could make it get out of its own way.
#8
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Deep In The UnderGround
Posts: 370
it's a xB, the vehicle is not built for speed, I understand modding and tuning it out, but the car will never ever be listed and or catagorized as a fast automobile...
6,000.00 would be better placed in fabrication and sound....,in my eyes anyways..
6,000.00 would be better placed in fabrication and sound....,in my eyes anyways..
#10
And realisiticly, where would you use a car with a ton of power legally anyway? THe only practicality I can see with it would be better acceleration times which could help merging onto a crowded highway easier. Unless you take it to a drag strip, driving it more than 90mph on a highway is kinda foolish and very dangerous. In my opinion.
#12
Originally Posted by NHGrafx
where would you use a car with a ton of power legally anyway?
SUNDAY, SUNDAY, SUNDAY, come see the nitro xB on display.... SUNDAY.... BE THERE!!
#14
Originally Posted by Max2k
$6K will get you a lot. The blitz supercharger is $3k, you could do that, an exhaust, header, and intake for a little over $4k in parts.
SUNDAY, SUNDAY, SUNDAY, come see the nitro xB on display.... SUNDAY.... BE THERE!!
te biggest obsticle for top speed in our boxes is the gearing.
my 5spd does
4K at 80 mph, it doesn't leave a ton of room in the tach for much over 130. (if i know the gear ratios i could tell you the mechanical top end)
#15
Originally Posted by dgHotLava
Originally Posted by Max2k
$6K will get you a lot. The blitz supercharger is $3k, you could do that, an exhaust, header, and intake for a little over $4k in parts.
SUNDAY, SUNDAY, SUNDAY, come see the nitro xB on display.... SUNDAY.... BE THERE!!
te biggest obsticle for top speed in our boxes is the gearing.
my 5spd does
4K at 80 mph, it doesn't leave a ton of room in the tach for much over 130. (if i know the gear ratios i could tell you the mechanical top end)
#16
the question **as i read it**
if you had 6000 and could work the motor for more HP
what would the top end be.
the answer is about 125-130 mph (due to gearing limitations, red line in top gear)
now the real question is how fast can you reach top speed??
if you had 6000 and could work the motor for more HP
what would the top end be.
the answer is about 125-130 mph (due to gearing limitations, red line in top gear)
now the real question is how fast can you reach top speed??
#17
Originally Posted by dgHotLava
the question **as i read it**
if you had 6000 and could work the motor for more HP
what would the top end be.
the answer is about 125-130 mph (due to gearing limitations, red line in top gear)
now the real question is how fast can you reach top speed??
if you had 6000 and could work the motor for more HP
what would the top end be.
the answer is about 125-130 mph (due to gearing limitations, red line in top gear)
now the real question is how fast can you reach top speed??
#19
Originally Posted by dgHotLava
well, besides the motor work, you'll need to find a better way to plant that power.
being a light car has some disadvantages...
being a light car has some disadvantages...
top fuel dragsters weigh about what our car weighs... but they are over 6000hp... they can do 0-60 in under 1 second... how?? easy... it is called traction... and dont' believe that a stupid wing gives downforce at 20mph... it is because the tires are literally glued to the groun...
your exactly backwards on this one, you want to weigh less.. for performance it is usually measured in lbs per hp... so a 4000 lb Diablo with 600hp, is about on par with a 2000lb car with 300hp... but actually you could probably even get away with less on the lighter car... check out the new Lotus.. 2100lbs and 190hp.... and that thing is a rocket...
the reason that you think this way is because "in the days of yore", you could only get high horsepower in big engines which were typically available in large cars... but this isn't even close to true now... An EVO or WRX STi will whoop any production car from the 50s or 60s...
weight doesn't give you more traction, it gives you more inertia... so my point is that it is a trade off, and not "better"... if anything you want balanced weight, you need to look at things like center of gravity or front to back weight ratios... in a car like ours you might could benefit from having as much as 70% of the weight up front...
science time... take a weight, hang it on a string... accelerate smoothly in your car... the angle of the string is the sum of the accelerations of your car... at 0mph your acceleration is 32ft/sec/sec DOWN... (there is a nick name for it... "gravity")... okay, so say you can accelerate so hard that the string/weight swings up to 45 degrees, this means that the car is seeing equal acceleration from the earth and the car... there are maybe 3 cars on the planet that can pull this off from the factory... point being is that the weight is pointing in the reaction force direction that your car's center of gravity... you want this angle from the center of gravity to point to the driving wheels... so this is why rear wheel drive cars have it so easy on the drag strip... but under light acceleration this pendulum doesn't swing very much so for a normal front drive car, you will have better traction... so this is why people prefer FWD on ice... and RWD do better at the track...
#20
Originally Posted by mgithens
ah, now we have a contradiction... why do you need to weigh more??
top fuel dragsters weigh about what our car weighs... but they are over 6000hp... they can do 0-60 in under 1 second... how?? easy... it is called traction... and dont' believe that a stupid wing gives downforce at 20mph... it is because the tires are literally glued to the groun...
your exactly backwards on this one, you want to weigh less.. for performance it is usually measured in lbs per hp... so a 4000 lb Diablo with 600hp, is about on par with a 2000lb car with 300hp... but actually you could probably even get away with less on the lighter car... check out the new Lotus.. 2100lbs and 190hp.... and that thing is a rocket...
top fuel dragsters weigh about what our car weighs... but they are over 6000hp... they can do 0-60 in under 1 second... how?? easy... it is called traction... and dont' believe that a stupid wing gives downforce at 20mph... it is because the tires are literally glued to the groun...
your exactly backwards on this one, you want to weigh less.. for performance it is usually measured in lbs per hp... so a 4000 lb Diablo with 600hp, is about on par with a 2000lb car with 300hp... but actually you could probably even get away with less on the lighter car... check out the new Lotus.. 2100lbs and 190hp.... and that thing is a rocket...
finding a better way to plant the power to me means RWD or AWD
and the disadvantage of the light car is in conjunction with FWD. the transfer of weight during aceleration off the front wheels will let them break free easier...
and the dragster has the drive wheels at the very end of its wheelbase. and its wheelbase is somewhere near 225 inches (scion xB 98.4) which helps leverage the wheight transfer.