Notices
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Intake ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2011 | 12:28 PM
  #1  
mfeldhs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
From: Tampa Florida
Question Intake ?'s

When I was installing my SRI I noticed that there was a secondary filter permanently attached to the air box lid. Does anyone know what that is? Can you run it without it? I was thinking about taking it out of my wife’s 09 xB. Also what is the extra air box mounted to the intake tube closer to the motor?
Old Sep 14, 2011 | 05:11 PM
  #2  
Bdog4life's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 168
From: Santa Clarita
Default

The secondary filter is the charcoal filter that is what makes your intake emissions legal. You can run without it but technically you wont pass a SMOG test if you do. The second "air box" is a silencer for your intake.
Old Sep 16, 2011 | 01:15 AM
  #3  
MiniFridge's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
From: Boiling Springs, SC
Default

Anyone have pics of all of this? Has anyone taken these additional restrictions off and seen what performance gains thee are to be had for "free"?
Old Sep 16, 2011 | 01:52 AM
  #4  
TrevorS's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,778
From: DE
Default

Originally Posted by MiniFridge
Anyone have pics of all of this? Has anyone taken these additional restrictions off and seen what performance gains thee are to be had for "free"?
Speaking for my butt dyno, removal of the intake emissions filter from the OE air-box cover has no perceptible impact on performance. The mod to the OE that really packs a punch is removal of the snorkel. Beyond that, you can convert the OE into CAI, or you can buy an aftermarket CAI or SRI.
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 02:50 PM
  #5  
MiniFridge's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
From: Boiling Springs, SC
Default

Alright, as soon as the wife leaves to go shopping I'll go pop the hood and try and put eyes on the snorkel. She is never happy when I start removing parts on a new car. Any hacking or cutting required or just simple nuts, bolts and clips?
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 06:39 PM
  #6  
CIONIDE's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,012
From: Napa, CA
Default

Not sure, but I think this DIY is what you're looking to do, it's to convert the OEM intake into a CAI:

https://www.scionlife.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=111524
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 10:28 PM
  #7  
TrevorS's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,778
From: DE
Default

Originally Posted by MiniFridge
Alright, as soon as the wife leaves to go shopping I'll go pop the hood and try and put eyes on the snorkel. She is never happy when I start removing parts on a new car. Any hacking or cutting required or just simple nuts, bolts and clips?
The snorkel is easiest to remove with the battery out. There's a bolt ahead of the fuse box into the fender, two snaps anchoring the intake flare and the loop, and finally disconnecting and extracting the loop. It's completely reversible and definitely no cutting or such required. The parts just couple together.

Name:  xBsnorkel_1.jpg
Views: 71
Size:  29.5 KB
Name:  xBsnorkel_2.jpg
Views: 86
Size:  27.6 KB
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 10:58 PM
  #8  
ScionFred's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Bdog4life
The secondary filter is the charcoal filter that is what makes your intake emissions legal. You can run without it but technically you wont pass a SMOG test if you do. The second "air box" is a silencer for your intake.
Just to clarify, that filter is only to prevent venting fuel vapors to atmosphere through the airbox. Unless an unusually well-trained and gung-ho emmissions tester actually opens the air box to look for it and notices it missing, you'll fly through any emmissions test. Here in MD all they do is plug into the OBD2 port and look for codes.
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 01:59 AM
  #9  
MiniFridge's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
From: Boiling Springs, SC
Default

Thanks for the feedback. I went and looked at it earlier and was very surprised that anyone would intentionally put crap like that on an intake. It's coming OFF.

Anyone noted any mpg improvements?
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 03:31 AM
  #10  
ScionFred's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

Originally Posted by MiniFridge
Thanks for the feedback. I went and looked at it earlier and was very surprised that anyone would intentionally put crap like that on an intake. It's coming OFF.

Anyone noted any mpg improvements?
You're welcome. FWIW, as previously stated, I agree that the charcoal filter isn't terribly restrictive. I just wanted to clarify that removing it should have no effect on passing an emission test in most, if not all, states. I'd be shocked if removing it resulted in a measureable mpg improvement and equally shocked if someone didn't claim that it did.
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 03:43 AM
  #11  
MiniFridge's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
From: Boiling Springs, SC
Default

Lol, I agree with your last statement for sure. I am more interested in popping the snorkle off because that cannot do anything positive for performance.
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 03:47 AM
  #12  
TrevorS's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,778
From: DE
Default

Originally Posted by MiniFridge
Thanks for the feedback. I went and looked at it earlier and was very surprised that anyone would intentionally put crap like that on an intake. It's coming OFF.

Anyone noted any mpg improvements?
Removal of the snorkel improves the ability of the engine to breath, forget mpg, the days of primitive engine designs are long gone. If your goal is mpg, leave the snorkel in and make a point of maintaining tire pressure. If your goal is overall responsiveness, dump the snorkel, go easy on the throttle, and maintain a respectable tire pressure (both the latter assist mpg). I use 35psi (when I don't forget ), but the recommended values are specified on a plate at the lower rear of the drivers door.
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #13  
ScionFred's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

Originally Posted by MiniFridge
Lol, I agree with your last statement for sure. I am more interested in popping the snorkle off because that cannot do anything positive for performance.
It's funny how many little mods result in +3 mpg according to the modder yet the oems can't do the same thing with millions spent on R&D.

Actually the snorkel does draw air from a cooler location than the airbox will without it. IMO you'd gain more power by re-locating the snorkel similarly to the DIY link that CIONIDE posted. I'd get the TRD vent and place the snorkel end behind it. The downsides are that it won't sound any better and the snorkel may possibly be a bit small for maximum airflow at high rpm. Even better you could replace the snorkel hose with larger hose like Trevor did. This way you get improved sound, more flow and more peak power. Better still, adding a large scoop or velocity stack to the hose end would create a ram air effect at speed.

Hydro-lock shouldn't be a concern with this setup since the water would have to fill the airbox faster than it drains out before hydro-lock could occur. To be even safer, enlarge the existing airbox drain holes, add more or leave a small opening in bottom of the intake hose so there won't be enough vacuum to suck up water. Good luck.

Last edited by ScionFred; Sep 19, 2011 at 03:56 PM.
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 01:30 AM
  #14  
TrevorS's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,778
From: DE
Default

Just one question, perhaps I've totally overlooked something, but I'm unaware of any "drain" holes in the OE air-box. Please clarify !
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 01:41 AM
  #15  
Vlad1024's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 450
From: North NJ
Default

If I remember correctly there are a few small holes in the bottom of the air box.
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 02:41 AM
  #16  
TrevorS's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,778
From: DE
Default

Originally Posted by Vlad1024
If I remember correctly there are a few small holes in the bottom of the air box.
The only holes I'm aware of in the bottom of the OE air box are those used to install the three mounting bolts. They don't provide either air or water passage.
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 02:50 AM
  #17  
Vlad1024's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 450
From: North NJ
Default

Originally Posted by TrevorS
The only holes I'm aware of in the bottom of the OE air box are those used to install the three mounting bolts. They don't provide either air or water passage.
Its a little fuzzy but i remember a car having them but I don't remember which...
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 04:31 AM
  #18  
TrevorS's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,778
From: DE
Default

Originally Posted by Vlad1024
Its a little fuzzy but i remember a car having them but I don't remember which...
It so happens, I was particular about this. I very deliberately installed a CAI utilizing the OE air-box. However, to do so safely, I needed a way to allow air bypass in case of intake block due to water presence. My solution was to make an opening in the bottom of the OE airbox and install a flap over it so that normal air intake would be from the left front fender, not the engine compartment. Here is a photo of my solution.

Name:  xBPVCintake_2.jpg
Views: 109
Size:  61.2 KB

You'll notice directly beneath my installed flap two bolts that anchor the air-box base to the transaxle (the third bolt not being visible in this photo, but no less present). The OE air-box base provides no openings were I show a flap -- I specifically created a hidden opening for the purpose of hydrolock protection. Speaking for myself, I never identified any openings within the OE airbox that would protect in any way against hydrolock. However, given the high location of the OE snorkel air inlet in the forward engine compartment, there was no need on Toyota's part to provide such protection. It's only if one chooses to modify the OE air inlet that such considerations become appropriate.
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 01:27 PM
  #19  
MiniFridge's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
From: Boiling Springs, SC
Default

Thanks all for the detailed replies. I'll check out Trevor's DIY and use that as a guide.
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 04:13 PM
  #20  
ScionFred's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,387
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default

My airbox came with these 2 drain holes in the bottom. I can't recall ever seeing a oem airbox that didn't have drain holes.




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 PM.