Notices

Measurements of Tanabe DF210 drop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 09:40 PM
  #1  
Papa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default Measurements of Tanabe DF210 drop

I recently installed a set of Tanabe DF210 springs in my 2nd generation xB. In order to gat an accurate read on the actual amount of drop, I parked the car on a flat level surface and marked the location by putting masking tape on the ground next to each tire so I could park it in exactly the same spot after changing the springs. I took measurements from the ground to the top of each wheelwell arch and also from the ground to the lowest point in the center of the front and rear bumpers. I drove about 20 miles to my friend's house where we changed the springs, drove the 20 miles back, parked in the same spot and took the new measurements. Here's what I got:

............ .............. Before, After, Drop
Front bumper .... . 8.5" 7.25" 1.25"
Front wheel arch . 26.5" 25.0" 1.5"
Rear wheel arch . 28.0" 25.5" 2.5"
Rear bumper...... 12.75" 10.0" 2.75"

That was 3 weeks ago. I re-measured it today in the same spot to check for "settling". The numbers were the same as the "After" numbers above. If there was any settling, I guess it happened in those first 20 miles.

These numbers are a bit different from Tanabe's "advertised" specs. I believe they say the DFs will yield a 1.7" drop in the front and a 2.1" drop in the rear. Personally, I'm happy with a little less drop in the front and a little more drop in the rear. But I do find it strange that their figure for the rear drop would be 0.4" different from my reality.
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #2  
CIONIDE's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,012
From: Napa, CA
Default

Interesting results... my NF210's are going on next Saturday, I'll do the same measurement check.
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #3  
fuqua's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 209
From: WA
Default

Were these measurements with the stock 16 inche wheels?
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 12:22 AM
  #4  
Papa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default

Yes, and stock Goodyear allseason tires.
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 04:19 AM
  #5  
uberspeed's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,018
From: South Florida
Default

Same air pressure each time? ;)

Just messing with ya! Good measuring.
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #6  
Maddman's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
From: NC
Default

hows the ride compared to stock set up?.. Im still debating,dont want to destroy the ride quality
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #7  
JRT's Avatar
JRT
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
From: SC
Default

I have trd springs installed for 6 weeks not much of a drop F 5/8” R 1-3/8”
------------------- stock / trd's
Front wheel arch 26.750" / 26.125"
Rear wheel arch 28.375" / 27.000"

I’m going to install the DF210’s this week end
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #8  
Papa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by JRT
I have trd springs installed for 6 weeks not much of a drop F 5/8” R 1-3/8”
------------------- stock / trd's
Front wheel arch 26.750" / 26.125"
Rear wheel arch 28.375" / 27.000"

I’m going to install the DF210’s this week end
Good plan. Looks like your car sat a tad higher than mine in stock form.. It would be nice to get measurements from you after the DFs are in.
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 06:49 PM
  #9  
Papa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Maddman
hows the ride compared to stock set up?.. Im still debating,dont want to destroy the ride quality
The ride is just fine, better than stock IMO. The Tanabe springs are said to be 10-15% stiffer than stock. They don't feel too harsh or stiff at all - the small amount of additional stiffness is good, not bad. Also, lowering the car a bit yields less body roll in corners, so you get both a better ride and better handling. I'd recommend them.
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 10:27 PM
  #10  
Maddman's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
From: NC
Default

sounds what im looking for ,,,thanks for the info, i had eibachs on my accord and hated them , bounced continously on highway, hoping that isnt the case with the tanabes
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #11  
JRT's Avatar
JRT
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by Papa

Good plan. Looks like your car sat a tad higher than mine in stock form.. It would be nice to get measurements from you after the DFs are in.

I finally got some free time to install my df210’s ( 18 x 7.5 +40 w/ 225-40-18 )
I also installed the trd struts/shocks w/ the df210’s very nice ride
imo the df210’s are a little softer ride then the trd springs

---------------------stock / trd's / df210
Front wheel arch 26.750" / 26.125" / 25.500”
Rear wheel arch 28.375" / 27.000" / 26.000”
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xBrelease08
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Wheel & Tire
12
Feb 29, 2016 05:39 AM
mudguy
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Drivetrain & Power
7
Oct 22, 2015 04:31 PM
jthistle
PPC: Suspension / Brakes
1
Oct 5, 2015 09:32 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion News Forum
0
Sep 24, 2015 10:50 PM
prescottn
Scion iM Discussion Lounge
1
Sep 13, 2015 09:04 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 AM.