Notices
Scion xD Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

power underated on xD?? look here for the reality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2008, 01:45 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
blown_xa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PTuning
Posts: 1,902
Default

Originally Posted by turner
no ur looking at it the wrong way. I think its funny how people pay more money for a faster car but they cant get them to run fast. They run around the street thinking they are the hot thing but I like to bring reality to the table.
Yeah......... I think if you wanna play that card then think about this. a V-6 mustang is faster than a scion. you can get one for about 2,500 used. Or you could buy a fox body mustang GT for about 5,000. Say you hold out and get a 93 model with a 5.0 for about 4,500 - 6,000 depending on the condition that will destroy scions, civics, mercedes, and bemmers.......... dont be that guy bringing money in a car race.... I woulda won if i paid 21.000 but i get better gas mileage.... Geo metros get 50 with the A/C on and you can find them all day for about 2,500. don't be that guy
that is your opinion. I was talking about new vehicles anyhow. Mustangs are horrible cars to race unless u just intend to mash the gas pedal and hold the steering wheels strait. V-6 mustangs? Tell me you are joking. So much suspension work needs to be done to make Mustangs take a turn.

In my xA I chase down Cobras with 500hp wearing Hoosiers, my xA wearing Nittos. here:

http://www.get-fast.net/nasacross/052508res.htm

the xD, with the same tires and some weight removed would have no problem doing the same.
blown_xa is offline  
Old 06-27-2008, 02:19 PM
  #22  
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 55
Default

you just went from drag race to auto-x. mustang is a horrible choice for auto-x. the vids were drag and thats what the converstaion is about. and yes even a girly v-6 stang would beat a scion in a drag race. but you couldn't pay me to auto-x one.

comparing auto-x times to drag times is apples to oranges. but i stated that you said it was dumb to pay more money for a civic SI than your scion because you beat them in a drag. my point is you payed triple what you could get for something that would run faster..... i'm no mustang fan or anything i just know you can get alot of power for cheap with them.... just making a point.
turner is offline  
Old 06-27-2008, 04:29 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
tmrepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SE, PA
Posts: 1,091
Default

Yeah, if all you want is power..sure you can get cheap power. Sometimes people spend more time in their car and enjoy things like a fully functional HVAC unit with no leaks, or a nice comfortable seat with no holes from the excessive rub from you being sunken back in your seat. Stop bickering, no one wants to hear you anymore.
tmrepp is offline  
Old 06-27-2008, 11:19 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
blown_xa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PTuning
Posts: 1,902
Default

Originally Posted by turner
you just went from drag race to auto-x. mustang is a horrible choice for auto-x. the vids were drag and thats what the converstaion is about. and yes even a girly v-6 stang would beat a scion in a drag race. but you couldn't pay me to auto-x one.

comparing auto-x times to drag times is apples to oranges. but i stated that you said it was dumb to pay more money for a civic SI than your scion because you beat them in a drag. my point is you payed triple what you could get for something that would run faster..... i'm no mustang fan or anything i just know you can get alot of power for cheap with them.... just making a point.
ahh, point taken. the only v-6 mustangs though that are faster than Scions are the new generation ones, and even used are still around the price or more of a Scion. The older v-6 mustangs run 16's, believe me , I know. My xA normally aspirated 4 years ago was faster than my best friends v-6 stang, in a strait line.
blown_xa is offline  
Old 06-28-2008, 03:36 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
tmrepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SE, PA
Posts: 1,091
Default

normally or naturally aspirated?
tmrepp is offline  
Old 06-30-2008, 02:21 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
blown_xa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PTuning
Posts: 1,902
Default

lol i did say "normally" didnt I... me and english never got along.
blown_xa is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkillFreeJake
Scion tC 2G Aero & Exterior
17
07-27-2015 12:34 AM
rnaz1017
Toyota News / Q+A
2
03-20-2015 09:30 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion News Forum
0
02-25-2015 04:40 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion iM Discussion Lounge
0
11-20-2014 05:20 PM
crystaljukebox_com
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen ICE & Interior
6
02-05-2004 05:53 AM



Quick Reply: power underated on xD?? look here for the reality



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:24 AM.