Notices
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Suspension & Handling Coilovers, Shocks, Airbags, Swaybars...

Trouble Choosing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 03:15 AM
  #1  
brianhorne8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 55
From: Chicago, IL
Default Trouble Choosing

Considering either Tanabe NF210s or Eibach Pro Kit springs for my xA. I'm installing Monroe Sensatracs in the rear this weekend, as I want a softer, smoother ride. Many people have suggested the NF210s to make the ride even better, because, surprisingly, they don't stiffen it up at all. At least perceived ride quality is softer.

I have a question though. After looking at spring rates, the Eibach Pro Kit springs seem to be comparable to the Tanabes. Can anyone vouch for this? I may go with the Eibachs, if that is the case, because I can grab them for so cheap.

Remember, I want a very smooth ride. What's the word people?
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 03:50 AM
  #2  
sdsnybny's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,679
From: Auburn, WA
Default

Have you checked out this thread yet??
The Tanabes are not a progressive spring like the Eibach's
I have the Eibach's, ran both sets and love them. they are very easy around town or cruising but put it into the corners fast/hard and they are way stiffer than the Tanabes
Tanabe NF210 (F) 118 lbs/sq in (R) 140 lbs/sq in
Eibach Pro-Kit (F) 120-189 lbs/sq in (R) 69-211 lbs/sq in
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=50481
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 04:03 AM
  #3  
brianhorne8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 55
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I did read that. That's why I felt that they were somewhat similar, though I did not notice that the Eibachs are progressive.

So basically what you are telling me is, I can get a smooth ride around town/interstates, but when I hit the corners, the springs can hold their own and keep turning tight?

Which basically means, the Eibachs would appear, and in your opinion, to be a better set of springs for what I want. Is that a good assumption?
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 04:41 AM
  #4  
sdsnybny's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,679
From: Auburn, WA
Default

Yep that's why I chose them over a static spring set. That and a 1 million mile warranty against sagging
Static rate springs take the same pounds per sq inch to start compressing as it does to fully compress making most lowering springs more stiff/bouncy feeling than stock
Progressive springs start at a much lower compression rate than stock for a smoother ride then get very stiff, some times considerably stiffer than the static set when under maximum load.
if you look at them compared to stock you get a better idea

Stock are static springs
(F) 148 lbs/sq in (R) 160 lbs/sq in
Tanabe NF210 (F) 118 lbs/sq in (R) 140 lbs/sq in
Eibach Pro-Kit (F) 120-189 lbs/sq in (R) 69-211 lbs/sq in
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 05:17 AM
  #5  
brianhorne8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 55
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Hm...I may have to buy them.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #6  
burstaneurysm's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,312
From: Forest Park, IL
Default

I think you'd be happy with either choice. They're both good springs.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 03:34 AM
  #7  
Sciond's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One

SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,929
From: What's in your Box...
Default

RS*R Dow
n are progressive also
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DannyBoy65
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
1
Sep 21, 2015 06:23 PM
umnitza
Exclusive Sponsored Sales
1
Sep 1, 2015 08:06 PM
AMS13
Scion tC 2G Suspension & Handling
7
Aug 20, 2015 07:26 PM
kanundrum
Regional - Mid South
0
Aug 4, 2015 04:23 AM
Subaru86
Scion FR-S Suspension & Handling
0
Jul 31, 2015 04:33 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 AM.