new 2.5l engine
#42
Please dont thow 4 day old trash at me out of the dumpster....so dont get me wrong... I think the Fuse is pretty cool looking as a prototype..but as a production model? it just doesnt blow sunshine up my skirt... its cool, but not practical in its prototype state. Did ya'll know that the current tC design is one of the ONLY vehicles in history to be a prototype design that 98% of the prototype made it to the production model? a rare feat. I just would be taken back if the Fuse makes that same leap.
#43
Originally Posted by Mouse
Please dont thow 4 day old trash at me out of the dumpster....so dont get me wrong... I think the Fuse is pretty cool looking as a prototype..but as a production model? it just doesnt blow sunshine up my skirt... its cool, but not practical in its prototype state. Did ya'll know that the current tC design is one of the ONLY vehicles in history to be a prototype design that 98% of the prototype made it to the production model? a rare feat. I just would be taken back if the Fuse makes that same leap.
#44
Originally Posted by draxcaliber
Originally Posted by Mouse
Please dont thow 4 day old trash at me out of the dumpster....so dont get me wrong... I think the Fuse is pretty cool looking as a prototype..but as a production model? it just doesnt blow sunshine up my skirt... its cool, but not practical in its prototype state. Did ya'll know that the current tC design is one of the ONLY vehicles in history to be a prototype design that 98% of the prototype made it to the production model? a rare feat. I just would be taken back if the Fuse makes that same leap.
#45
the fuse thats to become the new is completly different. all that cool technology on the prototype will not be on the car (way to expensive)! again the huge b-pillar (look at the prototype) will be reduced to increase visability. also from what ive heard from reputable sources, the front fascia will be changed slighty. this is all in effort to reduce the cost i believe and to make it fit in with todays buyer demographics. the fuse is way ahead of its time in terms of styling and electronics. so only time will tell
#46
i dont see why its hard to believe the new 2.5L is coming... i mean the 2.4 is pretty aged by now. and its in half of toyota's fleet. they wouldnt just replace SOME of them in rav4s and not in the rest of the line. making 2 engines that are almost the same is a waste of money.
and i bet the 2.5 gets better mileage due to better technologies in the head. the older 2.2Ls in the camrys got way worse mileage than our 2.4s.
and i bet the 2.5 gets better mileage due to better technologies in the head. the older 2.2Ls in the camrys got way worse mileage than our 2.4s.
#48
Originally Posted by hunterUnknown
i dont see why its hard to believe the new 2.5L is coming... i mean the 2.4 is pretty aged by now. and its in half of toyota's fleet. they wouldnt just replace SOME of them in rav4s and not in the rest of the line. making 2 engines that are almost the same is a waste of money.
and i bet the 2.5 gets better mileage due to better technologies in the head. the older 2.2Ls in the camrys got way worse mileage than our 2.4s.
and i bet the 2.5 gets better mileage due to better technologies in the head. the older 2.2Ls in the camrys got way worse mileage than our 2.4s.
#49
its mainly the dual vvti. its how the new 270~hp v6 makes 22city, which is more or less the same as what the current 2az is rated at. the bump in power also goes with the dual vvti, and of course the slight displacement increase.
i used to get 27-30mpg her e in vegas, before being supercharged.
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008...a-applies.html
"The four-cylinder engine is a low-friction design optimized for performance and fuel efficiency. It produces 179 hp (133 kW) at 6,000 rpm, along with 172 lb-ft (233 Nm) of torque at 4,000 rpm (versus 166 hp and 165 lb-ft of peak torque of the previous 2.4-liter engine). The 2.5-liter engine employs Dual independent Variable Valve Timing with intelligence (VVT-i), which controls timing on both the intake and exhaust camshafts (compared to the intake-only previous 2.4-liter engine).
The redesigned four-cylinder engine is partnered with a new four-speed electronically controlled automatic transmission that is more compact, lightweight and efficient than the previous four-speed transmission. Fuel efficiency is improved over the 2008 model with EPA mpg estimates of 22 city/28 highway on 4x2 models and 21 city/27 highway on 4x4 models. The corresponding 2008 models were rated at 21 city/27 highway and 20 city/25 highway, respectively."
i used to get 27-30mpg her e in vegas, before being supercharged.
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008...a-applies.html
"The four-cylinder engine is a low-friction design optimized for performance and fuel efficiency. It produces 179 hp (133 kW) at 6,000 rpm, along with 172 lb-ft (233 Nm) of torque at 4,000 rpm (versus 166 hp and 165 lb-ft of peak torque of the previous 2.4-liter engine). The 2.5-liter engine employs Dual independent Variable Valve Timing with intelligence (VVT-i), which controls timing on both the intake and exhaust camshafts (compared to the intake-only previous 2.4-liter engine).
The redesigned four-cylinder engine is partnered with a new four-speed electronically controlled automatic transmission that is more compact, lightweight and efficient than the previous four-speed transmission. Fuel efficiency is improved over the 2008 model with EPA mpg estimates of 22 city/28 highway on 4x2 models and 21 city/27 highway on 4x4 models. The corresponding 2008 models were rated at 21 city/27 highway and 20 city/25 highway, respectively."
#51
ok well from what i have heard about talking to the scion sales manager over at a scion dealer around here is just about the 2.7L I-4 have not heard anything about the 2.5L. also he said that it will be out sometime next year and it has 190hp. thats all he really had to say about it. next time i see him ill ask him more about it. also he said that most of scion agreed that they all wanted to see a scion that was a strictly performance car and they want to go with stock turbo. he said its in design right now. thats going to be awesome IMO. def something i would trade my tc in for that beast.
#53
it sounds like from hunter's post that it appears to be top end tweaks for the engine. so a mod would be done fairly easily to the 2.4. I wouldnt do it for the hp gains which are minimal at best... As for the automatic trans... the only thing auto trans are good for are boat anchors.
#55
nexus.... so where does your info come from? Have you seen articles on the future of the line? I'm not attacking... just looking to see what is actually going to happen to the line after 09.
#57
Originally Posted by youngflyer
bro look at the post above. the "prototype" fuse will be replacing the tc and to my guess will possibly have either the 2.5 or 2.7 but most likely the 2.5
#60
Originally Posted by Mouse
nexus.... so where does your info come from? Have you seen articles on the future of the line? I'm not attacking... just looking to see what is actually going to happen to the line after 09.