Notices
Autosports & Technique
General driving and racing...

The pony that ate my dust!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #161  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by jercho73
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jercho73
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jercho73
Originally Posted by xSTANDxSTRONGx

Sorry homie, I was sad to hear it, but g/f's car ('03 auto 'Stang) only came stock with 160-165 hp tops. Don't overestimate you car....oh yeah, dirve a stick it's more fun, and you get to use the hp you pay for!
03 v6's were 190/ 220 and 3066 lbs. That's 30-more hp, 57 more ft/lb tq then a Tc, and less then 200lbs more then a TC. A good manual Tc driver might take a new edge auto v6, but that's it.

The 05- v6's are 210/240 and about 3400 lbs. 50 more hp, 77 more ft/lb tq then a Tc and 500 lbs more. Autos are getting low 15's, and thats not mag times those're individual owner times. Stock for stock from a dig no chance for the Tc, only hope is to catch an auto on a roll, because stock the downshift is crappy and we have no top end.

You guys severly overestimate your cars and underestimate the v6 Mustang. It's not even worth talking GT, because unless you're turbo'd a Tc isn't beating a v8 straight up.


What are the times on the m/t 05 V6's? 500lbs is a lot of weight.
High 14's manual/ low 15's auto...despite all the ragging on it I see here, a non f/i Tc is not taking the new v6, stock for stock or mod for mod, in a race from a dig it isn't even close. From a roll it'll obviously play more in the Tc's favor, stock the v6 is a dog from a roll. The new edge v6's are more of a race for a Tc.

I ran Low 15's from a dig with only a full exhaust. So, how can you say it won't be close?

You said Stock for Stock or mod for mod.....The original poster has a modded tC, and GT was stock right? So, now why is it hard to believe?
You asked me for 05+ v6 times, the GT is a good second faster. Anyway, you claim a 15.1 in a modded manual Tc....compare that to a modded manual v6, which are mid 14's. Compare an auto Tc to an auto Mustang and there's close to a second difference. The average times stock manual Tc's are running as i see here are at best 15.5, don't compare a great time for a modded manual Tc to a stock auto Mustang v6, don't compare modded to stock...you're making unfair comparisions in the Tc's favor.

Noooo.....I'm not making unfair comparsions. I'm not comparing at all. I was just looking at the facts in that this tC in question was modded right? And his cliams were that of a Stock GT right? I'm just seeing if it was possible.

PS....What happens on a track, are not the same results of what could/would happen on the street. You already knew that, but I just thought I would share that for the rest of the people.

Look above, I found the times for Stock GT's.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #162  
flintgauge86's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 486
From: Dallas, TX
Default

You are the one that said all the weight goes to the back,thn i said then that it should make the tC corner like none other! You guys are killing me! I never said FWD was better, and I'm not trying to convince anyone that FWD is a better setup than RWD. I even said myself RWD beats FWD hands down, (that's why I freakin sold my tC for the 350Z), becuz it's freakin' Rear Wheel Drive! I'm trying to show you that on the street, with average joe drivers, how a car such as the tC could have possibly beaten a mustang GT. AGAIN I SAY(FOR THE HARD OF HEARING, in this case hard of reading). I"m not Arguing RWD vs FWD( i'm pretty sure I've said that before too). I'm really on the mutang guys side when it comes to someone in a 4 banger claiming to have to have beat a GT mustang. IT sounds pretty crazy. But I will repeat my self a third time, and say again, I was there, I was driving, I raced the mustang. The mustang driver was the one edging up at the light and reving his engine. I thought it'd be fun to go for it, expecting to loose. Well loe and behold! I take him by a maybe a car length.... He looked pretty ____ed when he pulled up at the next light, so maybe he did screw up. I don't know. All I know it I was infront of him when I let off. That is it! You can't argue with that. And yet you guys get so ____ed off and defensive at the thought that this might have actually happened. Don't think you are the God of cars just because youre 11 years older than me.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 04:50 PM
  #163  
jercho73's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jercho73
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jercho73
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jercho73
Originally Posted by xSTANDxSTRONGx

Sorry homie, I was sad to hear it, but g/f's car ('03 auto 'Stang) only came stock with 160-165 hp tops. Don't overestimate you car....oh yeah, dirve a stick it's more fun, and you get to use the hp you pay for!
03 v6's were 190/ 220 and 3066 lbs. That's 30-more hp, 57 more ft/lb tq then a Tc, and less then 200lbs more then a TC. A good manual Tc driver might take a new edge auto v6, but that's it.

The 05- v6's are 210/240 and about 3400 lbs. 50 more hp, 77 more ft/lb tq then a Tc and 500 lbs more. Autos are getting low 15's, and thats not mag times those're individual owner times. Stock for stock from a dig no chance for the Tc, only hope is to catch an auto on a roll, because stock the downshift is crappy and we have no top end.

You guys severly overestimate your cars and underestimate the v6 Mustang. It's not even worth talking GT, because unless you're turbo'd a Tc isn't beating a v8 straight up.


What are the times on the m/t 05 V6's? 500lbs is a lot of weight.
High 14's manual/ low 15's auto...despite all the ragging on it I see here, a non f/i Tc is not taking the new v6, stock for stock or mod for mod, in a race from a dig it isn't even close. From a roll it'll obviously play more in the Tc's favor, stock the v6 is a dog from a roll. The new edge v6's are more of a race for a Tc.

I ran Low 15's from a dig with only a full exhaust. So, how can you say it won't be close?

You said Stock for Stock or mod for mod.....The original poster has a modded tC, and GT was stock right? So, now why is it hard to believe?
You asked me for 05+ v6 times, the GT is a good second faster. Anyway, you claim a 15.1 in a modded manual Tc....compare that to a modded manual v6, which are mid 14's. Compare an auto Tc to an auto Mustang and there's close to a second difference. The average times stock manual Tc's are running as i see here are at best 15.5, don't compare a great time for a modded manual Tc to a stock auto Mustang v6, don't compare modded to stock...you're making unfair comparisions in the Tc's favor.

Noooo.....I'm not making unfair comparsions. I'm not comparing at all. I was just looking at the facts in that this tC in question was modded right? And his cliams were that of a Stock GT right? I'm just seeing if it was possible.

PS....What happens on a track, are not the same results of what could/would happen on the street. You already knew that, but I just thought I would share that for the rest of the people.

Look above, I found the times for Stock GT's.
I agree that what happens on the streets is a terrible indicator of what car is quicker, particularly any street race that goes from a roll. There are just too many outside factors in a street race, 9/10 street races aren't entirely fair races, it's from a roll, someone goes first, someone doesn't go full throttle etc. That's why i only take seriously runs at the track.

As far as a GT goes, your looking at high 13/low 14 for 05+, low 14/mid 14 for 99-04 <new edge>, and high 14/low 15 for 94-98 stock. So maybe a modded Tc could run with a 94-98 auto, the others are out of it's range without f/i.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #164  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

^^I own Rear and Front....Now I just need Side-to-Side..
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #165  
THansenite's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,757
From: West Des Moines, IA
Default

Originally Posted by jercho73
That's why i only take seriously runs at the track.
This is probably one of the most intelligent sentences in this whole thread.

While I am not a fan of mustangs and will probably never own one, I do respect them. Last weekend, the Central Iowa Mustang Club rented a track to autoX on and invited anyone to come regardless of what they drove. I had a fun time chatting with the mustang guys about our cars. It was interesting to see how the mustangs went around the track compared to the precious few FWD cars at the event.

Seeing some of those cars rocket out of the turns gave me respect for the power of those cars. I wouldn't want to try to take one at the strip or on the road (racing on public roads is stupid anyway ) because of the difference in power. Keep racing on the track. Bring me a timeslip of you beating a GT and THEN, I will be impressed. Until then
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #166  
xSTANDxSTRONGx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team XcelsiA
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,570
From: 2002 Day Member (8-6-11)
Default

How did the FWD's do against the Mustangs on the Auto-x?
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 05:52 PM
  #167  
DouBLeJ16's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,114
From: Cape Coral, Florida
Default

I didn't notice this thread until now.. I just wanted to share my experiences against a few mustang GT's.

One of my good friend's has a stock '03 GT automatic, not many miles on it.. Back when I had intake & header only we raced a few times. My tC would get a jump on him off the line all the way to about the middle of third gear, then he would pull on me (maybe about 2 car lengths).. Every single time we raced it would be same outcome. If his car was manual it would definately beat me badly from the line and from a roll, but that automatic really hurts that car.

I raced another automatic '04 GT at the track (1/8th mile) about 2 weeks ago.. He ran a 9.7, I ran a 9.9 but I got the win light because of a good reaction time, however his trap speed was about 3-4 mph higher then mine, so from a roll it would of been over for me. The best time I saw him run all night was a 9.6, best from me was a 9.8, so it is a pretty close race as long as you don't go past about 75mph.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 06:23 PM
  #168  
THansenite's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,757
From: West Des Moines, IA
Default

Originally Posted by xSTANDxSTRONGx
How did the FWD's do against the Mustangs on the Auto-x?
Like I said, there were very few FWD cars. It was my first time ever on a road course but I have done a lot of research in "racing theory" so I got my car figured out relitively quickly. I ended up about 27th out of the 50+ cars there. There was a CRX that got a little better than me but it was built for the track. The rest of the FWD cars were below me.

On my last run, however, something clicked in my head and I started seeing all the lines I should have been taking. If I would have had one more run, I know I could have shaved a few more seconds off my time, but that will have to wait till another track day.

The mustangs were pretty much split with some being fast and some being slow because the drivers didn't know what they were doing. A couple of the cars had problems because their cars had too much horsepower for them to control and were sliding all over the track. It was a pretty small and tight track ( 0.6 miles) so the V-6 stangs didn't do too bad.

There were a few guys there that knew how to really race and just blew everyone else away. They were the fun ones to watch because they were so smooth. They knew how to modulate the throttle and brakes and keep their tires stuck to the track.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #169  
engifineer's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,731
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

Originally Posted by THansenite
Originally Posted by xSTANDxSTRONGx
How did the FWD's do against the Mustangs on the Auto-x?
Like I said, there were very few FWD cars. It was my first time ever on a road course but I have done a lot of research in "racing theory" so I got my car figured out relitively quickly. I ended up about 27th out of the 50+ cars there. There was a CRX that got a little better than me but it was built for the track. The rest of the FWD cars were below me.

On my last run, however, something clicked in my head and I started seeing all the lines I should have been taking. If I would have had one more run, I know I could have shaved a few more seconds off my time, but that will have to wait till another track day.

The mustangs were pretty much split with some being fast and some being slow because the drivers didn't know what they were doing. A couple of the cars had problems because their cars had too much horsepower for them to control and were sliding all over the track. It was a pretty small and tight track ( 0.6 miles) so the V-6 stangs didn't do too bad.

There were a few guys there that knew how to really race and just blew everyone else away. They were the fun ones to watch because they were so smooth. They knew how to modulate the throttle and brakes and keep their tires stuck to the track.
Yeah, if a driver knows what they are doing, they will do some major damage in a RWD if it is set up right. The trick is that many more people today grew up and learned on a FWD, so they really screw up the RWD on the corners when they get in one. I grew up on dirt roads in RWD cars. I guess you could say we had our version of "poor mans rally "P " basically racing down dirt roads.. not the smartest thing, but we were young and dumb (16 - 17) you know. But, we all grew up learning to drive young and spending a lot of time on motocross bikes.. so we did some stupid stuff.. at least when we werent around other people and cars. We also had some way out in the country paved roads with some nice curves in them we used to act like idiots on... But once you take enough RWD cars down curvy dirt roads at 80+ mph and then jump in a FWD you quickly learn how deficient one is in the area of racing. A skilled driver in a RWD uses it 100% to thier advantage. I would love to find another RWD to autocross in. So much more control if you use it.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #170  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Have we finally ran out of stuff to talk about in the tC vs. the said GT, that we are talking about other stuff now....LOL.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 07:24 PM
  #171  
engifineer's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,731
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

^^ Pretty much I think we all got tired of trying to convince people of stuff.. kinda like a party.. two people start arguing..more join, then get sick of it and just drink and chit chat :D
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #172  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by engifineer
^^ Pretty much I think we all got tired of trying to convince people of stuff.. kinda like a party.. two people start arguing..more join, then get sick of it and just drink and chit chat :D

Old Aug 25, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #173  
jones75254's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 66
Default

Who cares, its a matter of facts, an 05 modded Tc against a stock 05 mustang GT with normal driver experience, is no contest, everyone knows it, GT easily, end of story.
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #174  
xSTANDxSTRONGx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team XcelsiA
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,570
From: 2002 Day Member (8-6-11)
Default

Originally Posted by jones75254
Who cares, its a matter of facts, an 05 modded Tc against a stock 05 mustang GT with normal driver experience, is no contest, everyone knows it, GT easily, end of story.
I thought we were done with this?
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #175  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by jones75254
Who cares, its a matter of facts, an 05 modded Tc against a stock 05 mustang GT with normal driver experience, is no contest, everyone knows it, GT easily, end of story.

Old Aug 25, 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #176  
xSTANDxSTRONGx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team XcelsiA
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,570
From: 2002 Day Member (8-6-11)
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jones75254
Who cares, its a matter of facts, an 05 modded Tc against a stock 05 mustang GT with normal driver experience, is no contest, everyone knows it, GT easily, end of story.

Thats what I said! BAN HIM! lol
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 11:19 PM
  #177  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by xSTANDxSTRONGx
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jones75254
Who cares, its a matter of facts, an 05 modded Tc against a stock 05 mustang GT with normal driver experience, is no contest, everyone knows it, GT easily, end of story.

Thats what I said! BAN HIM! lol

Old Aug 25, 2006 | 11:34 PM
  #178  
surfcity40's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,366
From: HB, CA
Default

great thread. as a tC "homer" (because i own one), i am having a blast reading how folk try and compare our 4 cyl fwd to an 8 cyl rwd. gotta love it, i'm almost on board with the whole "little engine that could"...heck yeah, it's totally possible for our camry to beat a gt. all we need is a bad driver in the mustang!
reppin' for the tC!
[/kidding]
Now, if you want to discuss JD Power and Assoc., fewest problems, customer satisfaction, best bang for the buck, at least it ain't a Ford, then we can compete.
we can't compete against a GT mustang power wise. (apples oranges).
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 11:52 PM
  #179  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by surfcity40
great thread. as a tC "homer" (because i own one), i am having a blast reading how folk try and compare our 4 cyl fwd to an 8 cyl rwd. gotta love it, i'm almost on board with the whole "little engine that could"...heck yeah, it's totally possible for our camry to beat a gt. all we need is a bad driver in the mustang!
reppin' for the tC!
[/kidding]
Now, if you want to discuss JD Power and Assoc., fewest problems, customer satisfaction, best bang for the buck, at least it ain't a Ford, then we can compete.
we can't compete against a GT mustang power wise. (apples oranges).

Aeee...just slap on a turbo and call it a day..
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 12:00 AM
  #180  
xSTANDxSTRONGx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team XcelsiA
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,570
From: 2002 Day Member (8-6-11)
Default

that's easy for you to say, xA's don't have ____.



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:14 AM.