Notices
Maintenance & Car Care Tune-ups and shake-downs...

87 or 89 gasoline!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 04:02 AM
  #61  
hunterUnknown's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,478
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

that'd make, ideally, 88octane gas, which would not make 6mpg difference :D its your driving.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #62  
appleguybruce's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
From: Mt.Juliet,TN.
Default hello

Yeah ,maybe it's cuz;I use nitrogen in my tires also and watch them like a hawk also.I do not submit to Scion's recommendation of 29 psi on the tires also.Thru my mods also I have been getting on average 43-48 mpg .So far I have beat 4 out of 6 hybrids in mpg test but,I'm wierd u shouldn't pay attention to me,lol.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #63  
awdisuzu's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 119
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Default

it's true that if your car isn't knocking then you don't need higher octaine. however, these engines have 11:1 compression which is very high for 87 which tells me that they have seriously de-tuned the engine and more than likely have a knock sensor installed (i'm not sure about that but my other cars have it) so if you run 87 you will not hear pinging because the computer has retarded the timing.

you will see a hp increase and mileage increase if you run higher octaine gas and advance the timing a few degrees at the same time.

and IF these cars do have a knock sensor, it's entirely possible that you can run 91 octaine and simply reset the ecu which would put the timing back to where it was before the knock sensor retardrd it.

this is all just a guess with these cars but the fact remains we do have retarded timing for 11:1 compression. :-/
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 01:58 AM
  #64  
sithscripter's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 356
From: North County, SD
Default

The 1NZ-FE does have a knock sensor, as does the Camry engine in the tC.

I've used 89 in the past and it seemed to advance the timing in my xB. At least it seemed to run smoother with a bit more power and slightly better mileage. But there's always the risk of combustion chamber deposits, which WILL gradually increase your car's octane requirements. Especially if you do a lot of stop-and-go driving.

If your car just won't run right with 87, try running Techron Concentrate in your next few tanks of gas, then switch to a quality regular unleaded.
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 03:58 AM
  #65  
ESEMRFOZZ13's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,251
From: SOUTHERN CALIFAS
Default

read it again, or unless they printed you a differant version.
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 02:57 AM
  #66  
kuro-xb's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 52
From: albuquerque, nm
Default

my choices are 86/88/91... 88 it is...
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 12:23 AM
  #67  
Jiggaman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Big Sky Scion
Scikotics
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,123
From: -
Default

Originally Posted by sexyscionlover
It just feels faster because your pockets are emptier



basically rule of thumb, go with what is cheapest as long as its 87 or over.

scott
i have never heard anything so true in my 20 years of existence!
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 03:38 AM
  #68  
Supercharge_returns's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Default

....
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 03:42 AM
  #69  
mikee1680's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 150
Default

I tried 89 and it made no difference, at all. Stick with 87.
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 02:09 PM
  #70  
hunterUnknown's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,478
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

the only possible difference is in chronic buildup of various deposits in the engine.
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 07:01 AM
  #71  
Greg2385's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 544
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Do you think 89 is a good idea for simply running an intake and exaust?
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 09:20 PM
  #72  
emiller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Default

no
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:27 PM
  #73  
kitkit201's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 286
From: Daly City, CA
Default

so we now have 87/88/89/90/91 octane in california if we mix the grades together.. wtf!
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #74  
R2D2's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 985
Default

tC owners, try 87 than try 91 than go back to 87 and see if there's any difference.

Some of u say it's "exactly" the same (except the pocket is lighter - that's a good one I must admit), but until you've tried it yourself you have no idea.
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 12:13 AM
  #75  
kitkit201's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 286
From: Daly City, CA
Default

I'm going to try an 87 this week and see how that works.. im thinking it makes a very minute difference other than the pocket book.. esepcially on a 1.5ltr
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarkMercury
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
20
Jan 26, 2007 03:54 PM
TheRealBoxster
Off-topic Cafe
0
Jan 8, 2007 01:30 AM
davebehrens
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Owners Lounge
25
Aug 26, 2006 04:59 PM
scionlife
Toyota Prius Owners Lounge
0
May 30, 2006 04:36 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44 AM.