DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)
Originally Posted by Elijahtc
u sure it wasn't an expensive L lens? cause sharp shots are only taken with L lenses according to some people......
hah, take a 200mm shot with an ef lens and a 200mm shot with an L lens fully extended shot of a distant object like the moon and you tell me which one will be sharper?elijah, please dont take any of my comments to heart.
nah im just saying, just a lens doesn't mean one shot is gonna be better than the other. Yeah it does help but a tool is only as good as the person using and the knowledge that person has with the tool.
Originally Posted by Elijahtc
nah im just saying, just a lens doesn't mean one shot is gonna be better than the other. Yeah it does help but a tool is only as good as the person using and the knowledge that person has with the tool.
this is what Im trying to get at. the moon is just a sample case. However it does take skill to take good photos and a keen eye. I was just mentioning a while back that the moon photos wasn't the best example.
equipment does matter when its in the hands of a good user Ive seen this first hand. not that the equipment necessarily makes the photographer, but the equipment less restricts the users potential.
my friends 20d with a 2.8 70-200L lens smokes anything my 50d and 70-300 ef is usm lens can ever hope to muster. Sharpness, saturation and contrast is on a whole different level.








