DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)
snow, i like the first one.
Alas, that's cool. Just thought I'd pick at u for dodging the heck outta her legs. ha ha (maybe use a light to light up the BOTTOM of the picture next time?) ha ha
Alas, that's cool. Just thought I'd pick at u for dodging the heck outta her legs. ha ha (maybe use a light to light up the BOTTOM of the picture next time?) ha ha
playing with some 50mm action on the 40D..

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mike_tseng/3380542899/
and i like to post medium pics that way you can kinda get the idea of the shot.. if you want to see the full size click da linkzz

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mike_tseng/3380542899/
and i like to post medium pics that way you can kinda get the idea of the shot.. if you want to see the full size click da linkzz
Originally Posted by kiss_kiss_kill
Too much glare on cars kills the shots IMO.
sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt
Originally Posted by BlckdOutTC
yeah...could be the condensing of the pics, happens to me a lot too
Because of this you'll get jaggies
im sitting on the fence in regards to picking up the tamron 17-50 f2.8
anyone here have any thoughts about this lens?
I use the 18-55 is kit lens for wide angle but I want a sharper faster lens. the kit lens also seems to be prone to heavy CA when in bright sunlight.
but since owning the 18 55, ii find that I use it the most out of all my lenses, I like to shoot at a wide focal length. when I have the kit lens on I only use it at the 18mm because quite frankly IQ wise I have better lenses for the other focal lengths.
also considering the sigma 30mm 1.4 for low light indoor photos.
decisions decisions..
yes I know, Canon lenses are the way to go, but they also cost 3 times as much money with what seems to be marginal IQ differences from the pics Ive seen relative to the very large price difference.
Nothing a little processing cant alleviate.
anyone here have any thoughts about this lens?
I use the 18-55 is kit lens for wide angle but I want a sharper faster lens. the kit lens also seems to be prone to heavy CA when in bright sunlight.
but since owning the 18 55, ii find that I use it the most out of all my lenses, I like to shoot at a wide focal length. when I have the kit lens on I only use it at the 18mm because quite frankly IQ wise I have better lenses for the other focal lengths.
also considering the sigma 30mm 1.4 for low light indoor photos.
decisions decisions..
yes I know, Canon lenses are the way to go, but they also cost 3 times as much money with what seems to be marginal IQ differences from the pics Ive seen relative to the very large price difference.
Nothing a little processing cant alleviate.
Originally Posted by DonNguyen
if thats what you think, then why are you asking?

however I was wondering if some might have personal experience with the tamron and if so how it compares with other lenses.











