Notices
Photography & Video A place to discuss and display cameras, equipment and photographs.

DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #8141  
Big_Bird's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,401
From: North NJ / PSU
Default



Old Jul 3, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #8142  
RnB180's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,803
From: Smallville, Kent farm
Default

Originally Posted by Elijahtc
If u have heard something bad bout the Canon 50mm 1.8 II then the owner was clearly a retard or abusing his equipment. I've never even heard of a copy that wasn't sharp.

When u start dealing with PRIME lenses u best believe that the image quality is already gonna be better than a zoom lens. Lot of less glass means less light has to travel through so it will be clearer already and the saturation of the colors is gonna be amazing.

I have the 70-200 f4 L USM and love it. I am more than confident on hand holding it. Just bump up ur ISO if ur having problems instead of paying so damn much for the IS feature that u will hardly use. I have 2 lenses that have IS and I don't use it on either one of them.

One thing u guys should learn is to quit worrying bout ur camera body unless u plan on selling prints. 6mp is more than most of u will ever need in the first place especially since ur mainly posting just on the internet.

Worry bout investing in glass and always save for the best and not just blow ur money at the first lens u can afford. Better glass will make a world of difference. And with that extra money u not only get better glass but better features like Ultrasonic focusing (focuses quieter and faster), internal focusing (means the front lens element doesn't move when u focus(meaning u don't have to reset filters after every time u focus), Image stabilization, better build quality, etc etc.

to me IS is pretty important for a zoom. Even at 2.8 I have to use IS indoors on the zoom lens. I suppose if you have hands steady enough you have no need for IS, then you can save yourself a lot of money. I need IS simply because when I shoot in low light, IS adds the extra stops. And quite frankly I get considerably sharper images in low light with IS on as opposed to off.
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 02:47 AM
  #8143  
Zillon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,976
From: Southeast PA
Default

Originally Posted by Elijahtc
I have the 70-200 f4 L USM and love it. I am more than confident on hand holding it. Just bump up ur ISO if ur having problems instead of paying so damn much for the IS feature that u will hardly use. I have 2 lenses that have IS and I don't use it on either one of them.
Sorry, but if you have the money to afford the IS feature, get the IS lens, especially on the longer focal lengths.

I've been in situations where the IS was invaluable to me, as image quality was absolutely paramount since I was getting paid for the images I captured.

Increasing ISO to get more usability in low light is no substitute for IS.
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 06:43 AM
  #8144  
bluaeon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 748
From: 909 CA
Default

anyone signed up for the world wide photo walk thats hosted by Nikon and Scott Kelby on July 18, Saturday????
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #8145  
Zillon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,976
From: Southeast PA
Default

Name:  liptonxabw-101.jpg
Views: 27
Size:  60.1 KB
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 04:55 PM
  #8146  
NYNCTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,458
From: CYN
Default

nice car and nice photo!
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #8147  
o8tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,131
From: Haterville aka Chicago
Default

taken with the 50 1.8 ll

Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #8148  
NYNCTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,458
From: CYN
Default

ugly........ : )
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:10 PM
  #8149  
o8tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,131
From: Haterville aka Chicago
Default

got your coilovers on?
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:11 PM
  #8150  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

I expect to see fireworks and other 4th related photos in here by tomorrow. No excuses.
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #8151  
o8tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,131
From: Haterville aka Chicago
Default

i have some from last night...went to the taste of Chicago. there was SOOOO many people. i'll post pics in a little.
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #8152  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Cool I should have some when I get back tonight. Going to watch fireworks. They're predicting around 200k people at this one venue alone.
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #8153  
o8tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,131
From: Haterville aka Chicago
Default

just went through the pics...i didnt like any. here's one to show how many people there was at the Taste of Chicago.

Old Jul 4, 2009 | 06:11 PM
  #8154  
bdis3's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,641
From: Delaware
Default

^ lots of people. wow
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #8155  
Big_Bird's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,401
From: North NJ / PSU
Default

Question for you peeps. How do you properly shoot fireworks? Tripod needed? What settings should I be using? I have never tried to shoot fireworks and I don't want to just end up with all crap photos tonight. Help please.
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #8156  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Big_Bird
Question for you peeps. How do you properly shoot fireworks? Tripod needed? What settings should I be using? I have never tried to shoot fireworks and I don't want to just end up with all crap photos tonight. Help please.
I was wondering the same thing so I Google'd it.

http://digital-photography-school.co...raph-fireworks
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 07:51 PM
  #8157  
Big_Bird's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,401
From: North NJ / PSU
Default

I googled too. this one seems helpful too

http://www.beyondmegapixels.com/2009...ing-fireworks/
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 08:42 PM
  #8158  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

u guys should follow the blog www.photofocus.com
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 10:25 PM
  #8159  
Ro_Ja's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,605
Default



Old Jul 4, 2009 | 10:27 PM
  #8160  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

nice shot Roja, gotta love those LOMO actions on PS. ha ha



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 AM.