Notices
Photography & Video A place to discuss and display cameras, equipment and photographs.

DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 07:05 PM
  #14661  
speedy000's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,645
From: Texas
Default

took these of my friends car. any tips for future car shoots? still working at figuring out lighting and angles for shots.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/speedy000/5098748452/http://www.flickr.com/photos/speedy000/5098748452/http://www.flickr.com/photos/speedy000/5098746982/http://www.flickr.com/photos/speedy000/5098746982/http://www.flickr.com/photos/speedy000/5098145583/http://www.flickr.com/photos/speedy000/5098145583/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/speedy000/, on Flickr

input please
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #14662  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

A flash would help. Even if you just bounce it off the ceiling. Also, try and get closer to the car. There's a lot of wasted space in 1 and 3.
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 07:36 PM
  #14663  
speedy000's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,645
From: Texas
Default

yea i need a real flash i hate the one on my camera...lol thats on my list of stuff to buy.
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #14664  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

nice paint job
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 10:29 PM
  #14665  
user 7208230's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,057
Default

Originally Posted by Jon
I'm pretty sure the DOF isn't fake. Subject-background separation is more apparent on a FF camera.
Unless it was at f/1.2 or so but even then it just looks fake. I've shot with a MKII and this doesn't look like bokeh but a weak blur tool. Even on a cropped it's not that bad.
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #14666  
user 7208230's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,057
Default

saw that car on your Flickr speedy what's coils is he lowered on? Flash would help, looks good but make everything pop more and a little less distracting with the shadows etc.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 12:45 AM
  #14667  
speedy000's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,645
From: Texas
Default

Its on racelands.
So flash it is just can't decided whichq one fits my needs there is quite a few to choose fromc
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 01:08 AM
  #14668  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

You have the 600, 700, 800, or 900. I wouldn't bother with the 400 as it's too limited. As the numbers increase, so do their power (except 600 to 700), features, and price. For general use, the 600 is plenty.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 02:19 AM
  #14669  
FlintMica2005's Avatar
Banned
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,883
From: Queens, NYC
Default

i love my sb600. such a great flash for the money.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 03:29 AM
  #14670  
faux_ghost's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 766
From: GA
Default



Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:42 AM
  #14671  
l1ttleslugger's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 183
From: vacaville ca
Default

Originally Posted by trdscion
Unless it was at f/1.2 or so but even then it just looks fake. I've shot with a MKII and this doesn't look like bokeh but a weak blur tool. Even on a cropped it's not that bad.

Actually jon is correct. And quality is cause I pulled it from my facebook.
But the shot I literally just kneeled and shot. And it is straight from camera no Photoshop. I believe it was shot at 1.8 with the canon 50mm 1.8. So no sorry no fake blur tool.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:44 AM
  #14672  
snowromance's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,192
Default

went zoo'in. this guy looked like he was having a rough day.

Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:45 AM
  #14673  
l1ttleslugger's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 183
From: vacaville ca
Default

Oh yeah and nynctc there style 42 wheels. Stock 5 series sport package wheels.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #14674  
Jasper Ash's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,231
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

NYNTC, thanks for the hints and advice!!!!
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 02:50 PM
  #14675  
FlintMica2005's Avatar
Banned
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,883
From: Queens, NYC
Default

Old Oct 21, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #14676  
SW_08's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,272
From: JeRzE
Default

THERE SHE IS!!!! lol
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 11:56 PM
  #14677  
FSUnoles's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 569
From: Kendall, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Jon
A flash would help. Even if you just bounce it off the ceiling. Also, try and get closer to the car. There's a lot of wasted space in 1 and 3.
seconded. Remove the fire spout and there is lens flare in 2
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 09:44 AM
  #14678  
purpled_out_tC's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,150
From: St'd:Bahrain, 4rm:San Diego
Default

new to photography and looking at a T2i. adorama has the body only for $719. and can get the body and kit lens (18-55 f/) for $849. I'm thinking of going with the body only and getting the 50 f/1.8. been reading/viewing posts on here and the kit lens doesn't seem necessary. opinions?
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #14679  
Racersky's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,904
From: Ninja Headquarters
Default

Originally Posted by purpled_out_tC
new to photography and looking at a T2i. adorama has the body only for $719. and can get the body and kit lens (18-55 f/) for $849. I'm thinking of going with the body only and getting the 50 f/1.8. been reading/viewing posts on here and the kit lens doesn't seem necessary. opinions?
I believe for starting out the kit lens is a pretty decent lens to have and use. The 50mm lens is definitely an awesome lens as well but you at limited.

Here's a picture I was messing around hanging out of my friend's car taking rolling shots lol.

Old Oct 22, 2010 | 01:03 PM
  #14680  
Jasper Ash's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,231
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

Nice shot. Shutter speed, please?



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 AM.