Notices
Scion FR-S Owner's Lounge
Scion FR-S Forum - The Scion sport coupe

S2000 vs BRZ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2012 | 03:42 AM
  #1  
ESEMRFOZZ13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,251
From: SOUTHERN CALIFAS
Default S2000 vs BRZ

Honda S2000 vs BRZ drag race.
Old May 23, 2012 | 04:15 AM
  #2  
Martyr03's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 114
Default

well that doesn't seem right seeing how the quarter mile for a stock first gen tc is rated at 15.6.
but i suppose a lot is down to how good the driver is at launching a car.
Old May 23, 2012 | 12:04 PM
  #3  
r2d2michael's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 723
From: Tacoma area
Default

again a drag dosent show anything on how fun to drive the brz/frs will be. but it would be nice for it to beat atlest some cars lol
Old May 23, 2012 | 12:26 PM
  #4  
NocturnalxRS6's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 432
From: Tacoma
Default

I must say, I am very happy with this video, it just goes to show how under powered the fr-s is and maybe just maybe they will understand that a 2.0l N/A motor in the fr-s/br-z is just not up to par as compared to some of the other 2.0 na cars on the market. I just don't see how 151tq/200hp in a 2700+ lb. car can equal fun, that is just my personal opinion.

The Tc has been tested at 15.7 or so with a pro driver, keep mind the fr-s has more power loss at the wheels due to being rwd. the Tc also has more tq.
Old May 23, 2012 | 02:37 PM
  #5  
gmc_113's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 706
Default

i hope you all know the frs is about 157 rwhp and not the actual 200hp that its advertised. its all about whp
Old May 23, 2012 | 03:09 PM
  #6  
JoeyC20's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 216
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

Originally Posted by NocturnalxRS6
I must say, I am very happy with this video, it just goes to show how under powered the fr-s is and maybe just maybe they will understand that a 2.0l N/A motor in the fr-s/br-z is just not up to par as compared to some of the other 2.0 na cars on the market. I just don't see how 151tq/200hp in a 2700+ lb. car can equal fun, that is just my personal opinion.

The Tc has been tested at 15.7 or so with a pro driver, keep mind the fr-s has more power loss at the wheels due to being rwd. the Tc also has more tq.
I agree with them thinking the engine is amazing putting out 100 hp per liter. The s2k puts out 240 hp with a 2.0 liter engine. Now thats impressive and they dont brag about it everyday lol.
Old May 23, 2012 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
NocturnalxRS6's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 432
From: Tacoma
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyC20
I agree with them thinking the engine is amazing putting out 100 hp per liter. The s2k puts out 240 hp with a 2.0 liter engine. Now thats impressive and they dont brag about it everyday lol.
Thing is, 100hp per liter isn't amazing anymore, Honda has been doing it sense the mid 90s, in the US market none the less.
Old May 23, 2012 | 05:02 PM
  #8  
JoeyC20's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 216
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

Originally Posted by NocturnalxRS6
Thing is, 100hp per liter isn't amazing anymore, Honda has been doing it sense the mid 90s, in the US market none the less.

Yea sorry thats what i meant. It came out wrong. I was saying that it isnt impressive and that 240 hp from the s2k 2.0 liter engine is. Not to mention the 9k redline.
Old May 23, 2012 | 07:04 PM
  #9  
torqueTc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,659
Default

Yeah, the civic del sol was putting out 100hp/liter back in the day. Same with the em1 civic SI.
Old May 23, 2012 | 07:15 PM
  #10  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by NocturnalxRS6
I must say, I am very happy with this video, it just goes to show how under powered the fr-s is and maybe just maybe they will understand that a 2.0l N/A motor in the fr-s/br-z is just not up to par as compared to some of the other 2.0 na cars on the market. I just don't see how 151tq/200hp in a 2700+ lb. car can equal fun, that is just my personal opinion.

The Tc has been tested at 15.7 or so with a pro driver, keep mind the fr-s has more power loss at the wheels due to being rwd. the Tc also has more tq.

Old May 23, 2012 | 07:16 PM
  #11  
Brichard0625's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 237
From: Bronx
Default

I dunno..i Really dont give credit to this video...I see alot of reviews and about 3 videos of the brz/frs doing 400m runs and hitting about 14.3-14.7 secs...15.7 is horrible for whoever is driving that car... And this has got to be an automatic brz because if you look closey the brz at about 99-100k shifts into 3rd when the manual one only goes to 3rd about to 92k in 2nd gear

Last edited by Brichard0625; May 23, 2012 at 07:42 PM.
Old May 23, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #12  
DEXBOX's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5
Default

what a close race.....hahahahaahahah
Old May 23, 2012 | 07:29 PM
  #13  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

And just FYI.....I've ran faster than 15.7 in a stock tC (1st gen). It's good for 15.4-15.5. So to say a 15.7 was done with a "pro" driver....is most likely just another magazine journalist test drive, to which they are not "pro" drivers.

If they didn't give the name of the driver....you can rest assure that it's not a "pro". Notice any test done with a real Pro driver, the Pro driver's name is given, because he has accolades associated with it. Magazine Journalist are not Pro Drivers. Magazine test done by Motor Trend, Car&Driver, Edmunds...etc, are again, not using some "pro" driver. Aside from that, they all have their own methods of reporting numbers so it's not even standardized/regulated to one stringent way of doing it.

Aside from that, it's pretty much a no brainer that an S2k would beat a FR-S/BRZ in a drag race. But both cars in the vid ran extremely slow. 15sec S2k...lol. Either crappy driver, or elevation is high in their geographic location.
Old May 23, 2012 | 07:45 PM
  #14  
NocturnalxRS6's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 432
From: Tacoma
Default

I would consider someone who has drivin and tested many more cars than you or I could ever dream driving in our lifetime a professional but that's just me. I'm just saying dont get depressed when you take your brz to the track and run 15s because a 14.3 in a 2800lb 200 flywheel hp rwd car is extremely impressive and honestly I think variations are in that video as well. The only videos that mean anything are the side by side comparison with another car or the brz at a real qtr. Mile track with light trees and time screens which I have yet to see.
Old May 23, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #15  
Brichard0625's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 237
From: Bronx
Default

^ the video that rythmnsmoke had put it up had proof of the brz and frs doing 400m runs on the same day against a miata and both cars put up 14.3-14.7 sec runs...if u read c/d,motor trend, road and track, all drivers were able to achieve about 14.7-14.9 sec 1/4 runs...and not to mention this comparison is done with an auto brz...im no pro so i cant say i can hit those numbers but u cant put a manual vs auto, have one car launch and the other one not, and put regular joes to race the cars and say ok there we have it...i knew the s2000 would win, but im just saying i rather a better comparo than this!
Old May 23, 2012 | 08:06 PM
  #16  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by NocturnalxRS6
I would consider someone who has drivin and tested many more cars than you or I could ever dream driving in our lifetime a professional but that's just me. I'm just saying dont get depressed when you take your brz to the track and run 15s because a 14.3 in a 2800lb 200 flywheel hp rwd car is extremely impressive and honestly I think variations are in that video as well. The only videos that mean anything are the side by side comparison with another car or the brz at a real qtr. Mile track with light trees and time screens which I have yet to see.
I wouldn't when they only spend a good week with a car, and their test consist of at max 3-4 drag launches down the track before they move onto the next task of creating the article about it.

They don't spend some lengthy time with a vehicle and sit there trying to optimize every potential shift and gear change timing. They are auto journalist first, test drivers second. This is why when you see a normal person who has his/her car for X amount of years and been to the drag strip or track a slew of times....running faster...than what was reported by Magazine X. The other thing to keep in mind is that the stock tires on this car I would imagine, don't exactly add the best grip for a straight 0-400m run. Taking my 300+whp car and slap these tires on there and I'd probably run slower than the FR-S does...lol. Maybe not, but you get what I mean...it wouldn't even be close to what my 2600lb 300+whp should run.

No magazine publication is going to use a real drag strip, because the focus is "street" performance. The drag strip is not the street so...

And as Birchard stated, there are multiple sources with 14sec 1/4 mile runs, not just the one video I posted up again with actual pro drivers in it.
Old May 23, 2012 | 09:24 PM
  #17  
Jdub86's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
MN Scions
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 832
From: Brainerd, MN
Default

I would buy a used s2000 before a new FRS/BRZ any day. Like some have already said the FRS/BRZ is just too under powered for what you get.
Old May 23, 2012 | 10:29 PM
  #18  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

^If an S2k works for you then for sure, it is a great buy. I've sat in my friends and it was like sitting in a straight jacket for me. No room, like a Miata. That, and I just can't do a convertible (not with my boy ridding shotgun anyway). So the comparison here is a 4 seater sports car with hard top against a 2 seater convertible.
Old May 24, 2012 | 03:33 AM
  #19  
NocturnalxRS6's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 432
From: Tacoma
Default

Not sure what you mean by your 300whp car but If this thing had anymore grip it would probably bog coming off the line lol
Old May 24, 2012 | 11:59 AM
  #20  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by NocturnalxRS6
Not sure what you mean by your 300whp car but If this thing had anymore grip it would probably bog coming off the line lol
My tC is 300+who and weighs 2600lbs. I was saying with these tires I probably would run the same times...lol. albeit with a ridiculous trap speed.

And no it wouldn't bog with stickier tires. You could throw drag radials on it and still not bog. That's if you know how to drive. I've done drag radials on stock HP tC and not bog.



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 AM.