Notices

Official 2011 Scion tC Thread (2nd gen)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #581  
gwtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,727
From: Canoga Park CA, SF Valley
Default

Originally Posted by Big_Bird
See my thing is that of course they are going to make a whole new car. But this thing is just ugly. And for that price, you don't seem to be getting that value a person used to get. As an xB guy, I didn't want the new tC to look like the 1st gen, but I was hoping for something the least bit appealing.
Then we can agree on the fact that Scion got it right the 1st time with the 1st gen then? so now its becoming difficult to create one better, just like they got it right the first time with the RS1 tC, its the best RS model to me, the TRD one comes in second in my book. The car is done and when it comes out, it will sell just fine, you'll see.....can't wait to see it for myself.
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 06:03 PM
  #582  
kanundrum's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,114
From: Laurel, MD
Default

Could it be they are making it intentionally lack luster and have more aftermarket "TRD" options/items for more of that tuner style feeeling
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 06:15 PM
  #583  
gwtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,727
From: Canoga Park CA, SF Valley
Default

Originally Posted by kanundrum
Could it be they are making it intentionally lack luster and have more aftermarket "TRD" options/items for more of that tuner style feeeling
That's a for sure, you know they will have some re-badge TRD stuff out for it, they already have a big brake kit for it, I'm sure there will be a cold air intake, oil caps, battery tie downs, front strut bar, rear sway bar, brake pads, wheels, shift *****, I'm sure a few more things. I seriously doubt they will be producing a SC kit for it after the nightmare experiences with the 1st gen one, I doubt there is room for a roots style SC back there, that's the only one that would make sense at this point.
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 03:26 AM
  #584  
woof's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 177
Default

Shoot me now!

Scion might as well close their doors. The 1st Gen tC was dated looking when it first came out and now this ridiculous mixture of show car and last years model!

Toyota can't help but play it safe. They can't get it out of their corporate culture. Scion was the opportunity for them to "get wild" and they have chickened out mid stream. I can't see this new tC selling as well as the last one.

Scion....remember the first xB? Be bold, be innovative, ok?
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 07:32 AM
  #585  
Thorium06's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,019
From: Lone Tree/ Fort Collins
Default

i waited as long as i could to comment on this to avoid my initial disappointment of the new tc, but i see no hope for it.

toyota just doesnt understand how to build an interesting car. the new scions are just going to end up as overweight uninspiring camrys that only people concerned with "reliability" and what park they need to drop their kids off at soccer practice would even bother driving one. seriously how could they manage to make a fat car fatter?

major problems i see with it at the moment:

1. weight.
2. weight.
3. its freakin fat!
4. electric steering=fail
5. the rear looks like they were about to design some fenders and then ran out of paper.
6. its heavy
7. still no proper seats
8. no lsd but i guess thats not a problem for taking kids to soccer
9. no sun extenders on the visors
10. maybe ill finish tomorrow but im tired

i guess even scion realizes they screwed up since they didnt even bother showing their pitiful excuse for a car at the denver auto show this week. grrrr!!!!!!!
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 03:45 PM
  #586  
Touria_Joe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4
Default

the one really good thing i can see coming out of the new tc is the turbo upgrade.....i would expect some impressive numbers with that kind of displacement
Old Apr 9, 2010 | 09:20 PM
  #587  
sancho's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 28
From: Dallas
Default

This car is one of the most epic fails in recent memory. Toyota has officially screwed the pooch on this. I also bet that most of the weight gain is in the front, which makes it so much worse. With their recent history, I;m not holding out any hope in the ft-86 either. I know that it has potential, but toyota will probably screw it up.

I mean there is a car out now that is a coupe, has a v6 with 305 hp (0-60 in 5.1 sec), is heavier, is bigger on the inside, and gets BETTER MPGs!! WTF toyota?? true it is more expensive, but a small coupe with 180 hp getting worse gas mileage than a large coupe with 305???

My next car will not be a toyota, you can believe me on that.
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 01:45 AM
  #588  
Pauly-FL's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 46
From: S. Florida
Default

I like the new version. It is not a radical departure from the current one, but when they did that to the xB - they got tons of complaints too.

Since we are only looking at pictures - the real truth comes in driving it. I didn't like the looks of either the xD or the 2nd gen xB, but after driving them - I really like them. They had lots of quality improvements and handled the road great in stock form.

I understand being edgy - but don't forget the TC thrived because it was 10-13k cheaper than the Celica GTS (which had 180hp).

I think they could have thrown in some LED taillghts and even LED DRLs to show up Audi, but overall they are not going to throw away a great coupe base, nor would they outprice their target market with an FT-86

let's all look foward to driving one - then we can really comment on how they did.
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 04:47 PM
  #589  
Thorium06's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,019
From: Lone Tree/ Fort Collins
Default

the gts weighed like 500 pounds less
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #590  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Pauly-FL
I like the new version. It is not a radical departure from the current one, but when they did that to the xB - they got tons of complaints too.

Since we are only looking at pictures - the real truth comes in driving it. I didn't like the looks of either the xD or the 2nd gen xB, but after driving them - I really like them. They had lots of quality improvements and handled the road great in stock form.

I understand being edgy - but don't forget the TC thrived because it was 10-13k cheaper than the Celica GTS (which had 180hp).

I think they could have thrown in some LED taillghts and even LED DRLs to show up Audi, but overall they are not going to throw away a great coupe base, nor would they outprice their target market with an FT-86

let's all look foward to driving one - then we can really comment on how they did.

What? The GTS was $20,100 in 2005.
Old Apr 10, 2010 | 08:05 PM
  #591  
CSOCSO's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,940
From: Davie, FL
Default

yes and celica also was 1/3rd the size and no room in the back or front for a 6'3" guy
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 04:11 AM
  #592  
SFTifoso's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 104
From: So Cal
Default

I get the feeling Scion is gonna be the new "it" car for moms who want to feel young again. Not such bad thing if they're hot moms though.

But as far as aftermarket companies go, I think they're not gonna be making parts for this car if that turns out to be the demographic. I'm not sure 34 year old Ashley would enjoy riding on Tein coilovers.
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #593  
JDMJim's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,152
Default

^^^^that statment makes no sense. I see grandma's and moms driving the tC1 as it is. and I can go back further to the Celica. same thing. I saw a New Camaro with a pink baby seat in the back. so that comment is nitpicking nonsense.

let's examine aftermarket...there is hardly anything for the any of the new Scions. I feel there will be more for the tC2 just because of it's coupe roots. I japan let's examine their versions....xD (New Ist) has a little more than stateside, but overall a better looking car than our xD. i really dislike it's front bumper. it's out of proportion to the bodylines. Rumion (xB2) has an okay amount of stuff but seems unpopular. I saw one modded new Ist of the two I saw and one modded Rumion of the 3 I saw.

Last edited by JDMJim; Apr 11, 2010 at 03:04 PM.
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #594  
Sciond's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One

SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,929
From: What's in your Box...
Default

actually we can debate this forever but here is the real problem they missed the mark because the reality is this car is getting no push.. read the auto press and will see nobody is talking it up and eagerly awaiting this car
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 03:43 PM
  #595  
gjpjr84's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,521
From: Dallas/Fort Worth
Default

^i've noticed the same thing. on this one website i look at for really nice cars and wallpapers. they mentioned the iQ and had photos of its stock and 5axis form but only just mentioned the new tC and had only the photos of the 5axis tC, not one of it stock.
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 07:45 PM
  #596  
JJGeneral1's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,265
From: Cranberry Township, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Thorium06
i waited as long as i could to comment on this to avoid my initial disappointment of the new tc, but i see no hope for it.

toyota just doesnt understand how to build an interesting car. the new scions are just going to end up as overweight uninspiring camrys that only people concerned with "reliability" and what park they need to drop their kids off at soccer practice would even bother driving one. seriously how could they manage to make a fat car fatter?

major problems i see with it at the moment:

1. weight.
2. weight.
3. its freakin fat!
4. electric steering=fail
5. the rear looks like they were about to design some fenders and then ran out of paper.
6. its heavy
7. still no proper seats
8. no lsd but i guess thats not a problem for taking kids to soccer
9. no sun extenders on the visors
10. maybe ill finish tomorrow but im tired

i guess even scion realizes they screwed up since they didnt even bother showing their pitiful excuse for a car at the denver auto show this week. grrrr!!!!!!!
number 4... uh, we've had electric steering for sometime. my 2008 xD had it...

number 8... ? LSD? the drug?
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #597  
Air2TheThrown's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 778
Default

JJGeneral1: Limited Slip Differential

yeah I noticed the media basically says is "...oh yeah there's a new tC coming out..." and that's all.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 12:19 AM
  #598  
gjpjr84's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,521
From: Dallas/Fort Worth
Default

They're Also noticing the crazy comment about the 16" brakes

Last edited by gjpjr84; Apr 12, 2010 at 01:49 AM.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 01:31 AM
  #599  
Sciond's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Club One

SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,929
From: What's in your Box...
Default

yeah I wanna see those
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 02:04 AM
  #600  
ecko04's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,243
From: Atlanta/Charlotte/Auburn
Default

Originally Posted by gjpjr84
They're Also noticing the crazy comment about the 16" brakes
I hope it has them....you'll need them to stop the 3200lb tank



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11 PM.