Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

*Got Big HP and Need Big Exhaust! New Product*

Old Apr 23, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #61  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

^^then stick with a 2.5inch. 3inch will be to big for you at only 300whp.
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #62  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

I know, I really just curious as to weather it's a DP back or Header back, it said both in Jesters video? haha
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #63  
Dyltone's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 662
From: Lake Worth Florida
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
^^then stick with a 2.5inch. 3inch will be to big for you at only 300whp.
Hate to disagree with you AGAIN... BUT...

I ran 3" downpipe and full 3" exhaust on my 300 HP tC and it ran much better than it did with the 2.5".

General rule of thumb... if your boosted, open downpipe is best, and the bigger the exhaust the better.

The turbo is your back pressure and no amount of exhaust behind it will ever be able to flow what the turbo can push out.
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 09:30 PM
  #64  
bcnu_702's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 918
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Hate to disagree with you AGAIN... BUT...

I ran 3" downpipe and full 3" exhaust on my 300 HP tC and it ran much better than it did with the 2.5".

General rule of thumb... if your boosted, open downpipe is best, and the bigger the exhaust the better.

The turbo is your back pressure and no amount of exhaust behind it will ever be able to flow what the turbo can push out.
I have to agree with dyltone on this one. I have not seen any proof (dynos) that show less power being made on a turbocharged tC with 3" piping versus 2.5", especially pumping 300hp.
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #65  
TCpete's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,373
From: WORLD WIDE Flossin
Default

lol i want one of these for my NA motor.. 2.5
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 01:31 AM
  #66  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by Dyltone
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
^^then stick with a 2.5inch. 3inch will be to big for you at only 300whp.
Hate to disagree with you AGAIN... BUT...

I ran 3" downpipe and full 3" exhaust on my 300 HP tC and it ran much better than it did with the 2.5".

General rule of thumb... if your boosted, open downpipe is best, and the bigger the exhaust the better.

The turbo is your back pressure and no amount of exhaust behind it will ever be able to flow what the turbo can push out.

Which dyno did you use to compare the two....Butt Dyno, or Real Dyno?
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 02:54 AM
  #67  
Dyltone's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 662
From: Lake Worth Florida
Default

Actually I used another car as my benchmark. I had a friend with an SRT that I was pretty much equal to with my open wastegate and 2.5 inch exhaust and when I went recirculated wastegate (less power) and full 3 inch exhaust (more power), I walked him pretty well. This was a few races on a Friday night, exhaust on Saturday morning, then a few races Saturday night so not a whole lot changed except the date and maybe a degree or two.

As far as the butt dyno, my car probably felt slower with the new exhaust because I recirculated the wastegate and the car was MUCH quieter with the 3" exhaust. BTW... the new exhaust was 3", mandrel bent, 1 resonator, no muffler. My car was quieter than it was stock with just the Borla Axle back.
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 03:14 AM
  #68  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

I see
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 06:40 AM
  #69  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

It makes sense really, you want the backpressure to be in the turbo to help spooling, but not afterwards as to not have backpressure on both ends... Causing lag when you're trying to get rid of it. But also at a certain point there is a optimal size to big/to small. IMO... IDK what size that is? You both could be right or wrong.
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 06:41 AM
  #70  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

It makes sense really, you want the backpressure to be in the turbo to help spooling, but not afterwards as to not have backpressure on both ends... Causing lag when you're trying to get rid of it. But also at a certain point there is a optimal size to big/to small. IMO... IDK what size that is? You both could be right or wrong.
Old May 2, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #71  
Shogun's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 256
From: Southside Chicago
Default

Would that small and slim muffler pass inspection in states that do a visual undercarriage check?

Also, it would be perfect if they can make it a dual exhaust just by using a Y section.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blue_xB_23
Introduction Forum
2
Mar 19, 2015 10:29 AM
STCxB
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Suspension & Handling
11
Jan 9, 2015 04:30 PM
JM Auto Racing
Exclusive Sponsored Sales
14
Dec 19, 2014 06:36 PM
scioninla
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Wheel & Tire
14
Oct 18, 2003 03:46 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18 AM.