Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

Back, Need fueling opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
gompka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,712
From: Chicago
Default Back, Need fueling opinions

So the tc is up and running, for the most part all is good. I have been slowly upping the boost and I can now hit 15-16 with the stock exhaust still on the car, boost gauge recorded 20psi if i open the cutout.

Problem is i am murdering the 700cc injectors with 100% duty cycle at only 14psi so i can't really boost above 12ish to be safe. Do you guys think I will be able to run 20psi with just a return fuel system or will it take even bigger injectors?

I think around 12psi 5000-6000 rpm the duty cyle is 75ish, but then as boost climbs above 12psi it looks like the duty cycles shoot up in the blink of an eye to 99-100.
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 04:21 PM
  #2  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

20 psi i think is achievable on return setup but will be in high duty cycles.. 900 or 1000 will give you plenty of room
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 04:25 PM
  #3  
gompka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,712
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
20 psi i think is achievable on return setup but will be in high duty cycles.. 900 or 1000 will give you plenty of room
It seems crazy that this little engine needs 700cc just to do what its going now. But surprisingly the fuel economy is still better than my is350 lol. Damn, just upgraded to 700cc from 550, I need to find some pnp big flow injectors now.
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #4  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

well you are looking at moderately high boost on a big turbo.. dezod 850 pnp or ptuning 900s are good for what you need
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #5  
gompka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,712
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Ace83
well you are looking at moderately high boost on a big turbo.. dezod 850 pnp or ptuning 900s are good for what you need
Yea sounds like the way to go, I think I will do the return fuel for now and wait a while on the injectors. Anyone know if the dezod intercooler can do 20psi ?
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 06:18 PM
  #6  
thendawg's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,720
Default

Im running the dezod intercooler with 60-1 on 19psi and its been great. My IAT's are within 10-20*F of ambient after multiple pulls on the highway. My MAF is blowthrough, so Im logging IAT using ScanXL. Of course it gets a little higher in stop and go traffic, but I dont see a larger intercooler helping this much. For its size, the Dezod intercooler is very efficient

Oh forgot to mention - Im on E85 and built bottom end, dont think it would have much affect on IAT pre throttle body, but wanted to make sure I mentioned it
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #7  
gompka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,712
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by thendawg
Im running the dezod intercooler with 60-1 on 19psi and its been great. My IAT's are within 10-20*F of ambient after multiple pulls on the highway. My MAF is blowthrough, so Im logging IAT using ScanXL. Of course it gets a little higher in stop and go traffic, but I dont see a larger intercooler helping this much. For its size, the Dezod intercooler is very efficient

Oh forgot to mention - Im on E85 and built bottom end, dont think it would have much affect on IAT pre throttle body, but wanted to make sure I mentioned it
Thanks for the info, I think I may eventually play with e85, but for now I have to see how things go with regular gasoline. I know when boost shot up to 19-20 I couldn't hook up in 3rd. Good to know that the dezod i/c can handle the 20psi though, i've got a comp 57trim .68a/r so i'm guessing your 60-1 is a bit bigger? I am going to be running blow through soon also, and upgrading to a 3" intake pipe on the inlet of the turbo.
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 06:46 PM
  #8  
thendawg's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,720
Default

Yea 60-1 is slightly larger - Im also running the .70 ar compressor housing which is like a 4" intake / 2.5" out. I found out I can hook in 3rd if I ease the throttle in so it gets past peak tq without making full boost lol With my blowthru setup, I dont even have an intake just a 4" cone filter on the turbo
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #9  
rougenite's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 258
From: Afghanistan
Default

I would say pick up some 900s. A return system is useful, but the cycles will still be high. You will have more room to mess around with the injectors then you would the return system. We all seem to want MOAR boost
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 03:28 PM
  #10  
DezodDon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 782
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

Using a return setup with a boost referenced regulator will make the largest difference. As of now you are stuck using the regulator in the tank. Which gets over ridden fast and holds one pressure. For each lb of boost you create you need to increase the fuel pressure by 1 psi. This maintains a static fuel pressure then. So if you start at 43.5 psi of fuel pressure and you add 20 psi of boost if you have not increased the fuel pressure you are effectively subtracting that from the boost. You would have a net fuel pressure of 23.5 psi.

This is why you have to run such high duty cycles.

Return fuel system with a proper regulator will solve all of your problems.

You will also probably see more power from less boost because of more accurate fuel delivery.
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #11  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

don said it well. Boost pressure is like fighting against fuel pressure, more boost more pressure keeping fueling from coming out of the injectors. Also a bad quality atomization
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
gingles's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,881
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

with 700's, return system and wallbro i was at i think 60% dc at 16psi.....return systems are well worth the penny.
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #13  
DezodDon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 782
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

It's like riding your bicycle into the wind. You have to pedal harder.
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #14  
gompka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,712
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by DezodDon
Using a return setup with a boost referenced regulator will make the largest difference. As of now you are stuck using the regulator in the tank. Which gets over ridden fast and holds one pressure. For each lb of boost you create you need to increase the fuel pressure by 1 psi. This maintains a static fuel pressure then. So if you start at 43.5 psi of fuel pressure and you add 20 psi of boost if you have not increased the fuel pressure you are effectively subtracting that from the boost. You would have a net fuel pressure of 23.5 psi.

This is why you have to run such high duty cycles.

Return fuel system with a proper regulator will solve all of your problems.

You will also probably see more power from less boost because of more accurate fuel delivery.
Thanks for the insight Don, that makes much more sense now. It looks like this problem is already solved ;)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lvlisslvlelissa
Scion xD ICE & Interior
2
Oct 13, 2023 03:40 PM
cid_mcdp
Maintenance & Car Care
4
Jan 5, 2015 02:45 PM
dgm458
Scion xD Drivetrain & Power
1
Dec 7, 2014 05:59 PM
eric_m
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
79
Mar 17, 2013 12:21 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 AM.