supercharger or turbo?
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Originally Posted by mattieg
Ya but isnt a turn around for a stage zero like 6 months... im thinking with the new price drop a supercharger would fit my needs. But I know I will want more. Check out the dezod s1, turbo toyotas stage one, zpi stage 0 or even treadstone. Get some ideas of what you want and wait a couple months and see what happens. If you still have your heart set on that one thing then go for it, wether it be a supercharger or turbo.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 278
Originally Posted by bakercrj
yea i been lookin at the zpi stage 0 too. but dnt u gota buy a bunch of other poop when u go turbo.. like upgrade ur clutch and injectors and all that
EDIT: I take that back. I just read a thread which says you need injectors if you turbocharge an automatic. You don't need them if you drive a manual.
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
No quarter mile runs, only 1/8 low 9's average with 9.19 being my best... and dont ask me to furbish any timeslips I lost them... 
All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...
This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
That's what I suspected. Not a stock S/C'er setup. With those mods, I can see you getting the 9.19 now. KillaSpiceTSW was referring to a Stock S/C'er when he said "3 grand you will only take bout half a second off your 0-60".
Seeing as how you are not stock, this does not apply to you. To which I have to agree with KillaSpice on, 3g's for half a second...not my cup of tea.
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Now you can add this into the mix, with a 12psi pulley, and either Greddy Ultm or UniChip tuned coming soon.
You are aware that you will loose PSI with that intercooler right? Methanol Injection probably would have been a better route.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 163
From: Boca Raton, FL
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
LOL....and yet STILL no evidence that it even runs.
Anyhow, back on topic......doesn't this thread seam all to familar?
I can't remember if you said you were on a Stock S/C'er when you ran that 9.19. Was it your constant time, or a one hit wonder? If a one time thing, what were your constant times?
What have you ran in the 1/4 so far?
Anyhow, back on topic......doesn't this thread seam all to familar?
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite Solcal tC
LoL Roll On Floor Laughing 1/2 a second on your 0-60 and 1/4mile. Right, that's how I ran a 9.19 in the 1/8, that's a full second off 1/8mile time alone giving more than a second off 1/4mile for sure.
What have you ran in the 1/4 so far?
All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...
This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
my above comment was in reply to this!
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Now you can add this into the mix, with a 12psi pulley, and either Greddy Ultm or UniChip tuned coming soon.
You are aware that you will loose PSI with that intercooler right? Methanol Injection probably would have been a better route.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by Gymo
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
LOL....and yet STILL no evidence that it even runs.
Anyhow, back on topic......doesn't this thread seam all to familar?
I can't remember if you said you were on a Stock S/C'er when you ran that 9.19. Was it your constant time, or a one hit wonder? If a one time thing, what were your constant times?
What have you ran in the 1/4 so far?
Anyhow, back on topic......doesn't this thread seam all to familar?
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite Solcal tC
LoL Roll On Floor Laughing 1/2 a second on your 0-60 and 1/4mile. Right, that's how I ran a 9.19 in the 1/8, that's a full second off 1/8mile time alone giving more than a second off 1/4mile for sure.
What have you ran in the 1/4 so far?
All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
my above comment was in reply to this!
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
No quarter mile runs, only 1/8 low 9's average with 9.19 being my best... and dont ask me to furbish any timeslips I lost them... All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...
This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
That's what I suspected. Not a stock S/C'er setup. With those mods, I can see you getting the 9.19 now. KillaSpiceTSW was referring to a Stock S/C'er when he said "3 grand you will only take bout half a second off your 0-60".
Seeing as how you are not stock, this does not apply to you. To which I have to agree with KillaSpice on, 3g's for half a second...not my cup of tea.
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Now you can add this into the mix, with a 12psi pulley, and either Greddy Ultm or UniChip tuned coming soon.
You are aware that you will loose PSI with that intercooler right? Methanol Injection probably would have been a better route.
I am aware of that, just thought I would point it out that you could get the same effects with Meth inject and not have to spend the money on an Intercooler + extra pulley to make up for the loss of PSI with your S/C'er.
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
No quarter mile runs, only 1/8 low 9's average with 9.19 being my best... and dont ask me to furbish any timeslips I lost them... All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...
This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
That's what I suspected. Not a stock S/C'er setup. With those mods, I can see you getting the 9.19 now. KillaSpiceTSW was referring to a Stock S/C'er when he said "3 grand you will only take bout half a second off your 0-60".
Seeing as how you are not stock, this does not apply to you. To which I have to agree with KillaSpice on, 3g's for half a second...not my cup of tea.
Not necessarily. Different driver, tires, track....etc. They might be capable of running those times, but rarely have we seen a S/C'er with those mods run that time. You never did say what tires you were on though?
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Now you can add this into the mix, with a 12psi pulley, and either Greddy Ultm or UniChip tuned coming soon.
You are aware that you will loose PSI with that intercooler right? Methanol Injection probably would have been a better route.
I am aware of that, just thought I would point it out that you could get the same effects with Meth inject and not have to spend the money on an Intercooler + extra pulley to make up for the loss of PSI with your S/C'er.
and to be honest I just really never looked into water/meth...
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
No quarter mile runs, only 1/8 low 9's average with 9.19 being my best... and dont ask me to furbish any timeslips I lost them... All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...
This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
All I have is the video of my 9.19 @ 77mph. mods at the time were. NST 9.5psi pulley, MMW Header, HKS axle back, and whp at the time was 222.90 and tq at 193.73, don't have a scanner up and running right now so I snaped a pic of the dyno sheet...This was before and after Brian at Fujita did R&D for a CAI for s/c tCs. The before is with the listed parts above, minus the CAI of couse.
That's what I suspected. Not a stock S/C'er setup. With those mods, I can see you getting the 9.19 now. KillaSpiceTSW was referring to a Stock S/C'er when he said "3 grand you will only take bout half a second off your 0-60".
Seeing as how you are not stock, this does not apply to you. To which I have to agree with KillaSpice on, 3g's for half a second...not my cup of tea.
Not necessarily. Different driver, tires, track....etc. They might be capable of running those times, but rarely have we seen a S/C'er with those mods run that time. You never did say what tires you were on though?
Senior Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Now you can add this into the mix, with a 12psi pulley, and either Greddy Ultm or UniChip tuned coming soon.
You are aware that you will loose PSI with that intercooler right? Methanol Injection probably would have been a better route.
I am aware of that, just thought I would point it out that you could get the same effects with Meth inject and not have to spend the money on an Intercooler + extra pulley to make up for the loss of PSI with your S/C'er.
and to be honest I just really never looked into water/meth...
From My understanding
W/ Intercooler (loss of PSI)
12-14 PSI = 10-12 actual PSI being seen.
W/Water/Meth (no loss of PSI)
12-14 PSI = Possible 12-14 PSI still being seen.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 741
From: west palm beach, fl
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Now you can add this into the mix, with a 12psi pulley, and either Greddy Ultm or UniChip tuned coming soon.
You are aware that you will loose PSI with that intercooler right? Methanol Injection probably would have been a better route.
I am aware of that, just thought I would point it out that you could get the same effects with Meth inject and not have to spend the money on an Intercooler + extra pulley to make up for the loss of PSI with your S/C'er.
and to be honest I just really never looked into water/meth...
From My understanding
W/ Intercooler (loss of PSI)
12-14 PSI = 10-12 actual PSI being seen.
W/Water/Meth (no loss of PSI)
12-14 PSI = Possible 12-14 PSI still being seen.
failure in intercooler under wot = loss of boost
failure of w/meth pump under wot = car go boom
