Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

TRD S/C FM/IC..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #21  
1tc4u2nv's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 464
From: Hialeah, FL
Default

Originally Posted by zer0
Originally Posted by CRAracer05
Ok www.bellintercoolers.com is who made the intercooler and on there homepage there a link to tjin's tc with claimed 280hp but the link doesn't work to see what all is done to the car.
Just some pics I have of his car..

no wonder they made 280hp it probably has a 75 shot, you can see the setup in the 1st pic.
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #22  
jwaggz82's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,259
From: Earth
Default

i think it looks awesome ....but how does it perform?
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #23  
BlKtC05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 107
From: Boulder City
Default

great with a full bottle
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #24  
BionicJuic3's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 984
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Where is the battery am i blind or is it repositioned
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #25  
Chapman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 480
From: Fremont, CA
Default

probably repositioned to the hatch?
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #26  
jwaggz82's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,259
From: Earth
Default

Yea - the battery takes up space ....when they put that fmic in they prob ran into problems w/ the pipe .....and wanted it straiter ...so there goes the battery.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 12:43 AM
  #27  
Scott8's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,688
From: Chicago Area
Default

where are his fluids??? I see brake, but where is the over flow tank for his coolant?
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 02:57 AM
  #28  
Nick06tC's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,277
From: Andersen AFB, Guam
Default

watchign to see future results.

(FMIC has no performance gains, just allows greater PSI due to increase charge cooling. So a FMIC alone, there is no needs for a mag to do testing to see its gains)
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 03:50 AM
  #29  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by jwaggz82
Originally Posted by Robs_tc
They don’t specify a boost level or supporting mods. Not to mention the advertisement is for crank hp not whp. If you do the math of hp lost to the wheels on a 100% stock tc, it’s about a 14% loss (1-138/160=%). This is only an estimate on my part just for the sake of argument, but at 280 crank is about 245 wheel. Anyone remember turbonetics 300hp advertising….
Ide love to see a 240whp mark because on stock boost or 9.5lbs ..i think thats impossible... I think they would need to be running over 10lbs boost, tuned, w/methanol,header, exhaust.

Anybody have a scanned copy of the magazine add? I bet there are a lot of people that would like to read it (including myself). The only problem w/ that magazine is that they love rice a bit more then I do. ...but the magazine has had tC's a bunch of times.

My boys S/C'ed tC dynoed at 238whp with
ZPI 9 PSI pulley
ZPI Crank pulley
DC sports header
Injen Intake
Borla axle back exhaust

We just finished installing a ZPI S-pipe for him as well. So, he should be in the 240whp range now. It doesn't take Meth inject for the S/C'er to reach 240whp.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 03:54 AM
  #30  
mattieg's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
teamNJCT
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,068
From: Connecticut
Default

In the article they said they were running dangerously lean after the intercooler setup so I would be very carefull with it. The guys that worked on the tC went to Ryan Takashima of Fujita air and Jim Renella of Performance Tube Bending. After the decision was made on what to do they then talked to Adam Carpenter at Unique Fabrication to do all the work. After the install, like I said above, the car ran really lean. They adjusted it with their Camcon system but still too lean. Sadly no numbers yet in the article but I do have some website you guys can go to and maybe contact the guys.

www.uniguefabrication.com
www.bellintercoolers.com
www.berktechnology.com

Last edited by MR_LUV; Jun 23, 2019 at 12:14 AM.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 04:02 AM
  #31  
redwar1441's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 569
Default

looks like a stock s/c pulley to me in that pic. soooo......combine that with the psi drop, all the mods etc etc 280hp? no frigg'n way unless he is running a 75 shot f n02 which you can see in the first pic.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 04:39 AM
  #32  
superchargedsciontc's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
Default

How can you tell it's the stock pulley from those pics?? 280 does sound like a stretch, but it does look pretty sick, and I'm sure it sounds pretty sweet with taht CAI setup!!
240 WHP with S/C without soaking a fortune into it is pretty sweet if you ask me, less worries than turbo and easier to deal with for the daily driver!!
I guess only time will tell how all the Turbo tC's hold up compared to the S/C ones.

______

Last edited by MR_LUV; Jun 23, 2019 at 12:17 AM. Reason: Awarded 10 Yr Badge
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 06:02 AM
  #33  
bcnu_702's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 918
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I guess I need to be quicker on my piping for a front mount intercooler. That is the exact seutp I am currently working on. The unfortunate thing is, the loss of psi. The water/meth injection system, after reveiwing it and gettimg some helpful information from RIPP, makes more sense.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #34  
zer0's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,613
Default

Also note: that car is an AUTO as well. Look at the orange tranny dipstick.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 07:51 AM
  #35  
Robs_tc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 635
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

I wasn't trying to say that 240whp is out of the picture. We all know it's very realistic. The thing I don't like is they just throw their 280-hp advertisement up there with nothing else.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #36  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by superchargedsciontc
How can you tell it's the stock pulley from those pics?? 280 does sound like a stretch, but it does look pretty sick, and I'm sure it sounds pretty sweet with taht CAI setup!! 240 WHP with S/C without soaking a fortune into it is pretty sweet if you ask me, less worries than turbo and easier to deal with for the daily driver!! I guess only time will tell how all the Turbo tc's hold up compared to the S/C ones.

The S/C'er has had as many problems as some of the people with turbos. Its not an "install and forget system". And don't forget, turbo tC's were rolling around WAY before any S/C'er. Perhaps as far as 2-3 years in advanced.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #37  
jwaggz82's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,259
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jwaggz82
Originally Posted by Robs_tc
They don’t specify a boost level or supporting mods. Not to mention the advertisement is for crank hp not whp. If you do the math of hp lost to the wheels on a 100% stock tc, it’s about a 14% loss (1-138/160=%). This is only an estimate on my part just for the sake of argument, but at 280 crank is about 245 wheel. Anyone remember turbonetics 300hp advertising….
Ide love to see a 240whp mark because on stock boost or 9.5lbs ..i think thats impossible... I think they would need to be running over 10lbs boost, tuned, w/methanol,header, exhaust.

Anybody have a scanned copy of the magazine add? I bet there are a lot of people that would like to read it (including myself). The only problem w/ that magazine is that they love rice a bit more then I do. ...but the magazine has had tC's a bunch of times.

My boys S/C'ed tC dynoed at 238whp with
ZPI 9 PSI pulley
ZPI Crank pulley
DC sports header
Injen Intake
Borla axle back exhaust

We just finished installing a ZPI S-pipe for him as well. So, he should be in the 240whp range now. It doesn't take Meth inject for the S/C'er to reach 240whp.
but he has a FMIC - that alone is taking atleast 1lb of boost ...maybe 3lbs from him.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #38  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by jwaggz82
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by jwaggz82
Originally Posted by Robs_tc
They don’t specify a boost level or supporting mods. Not to mention the advertisement is for crank hp not whp. If you do the math of hp lost to the wheels on a 100% stock tc, it’s about a 14% loss (1-138/160=%). This is only an estimate on my part just for the sake of argument, but at 280 crank is about 245 wheel. Anyone remember turbonetics 300hp advertising….
Ide love to see a 240whp mark because on stock boost or 9.5lbs ..i think thats impossible... I think they would need to be running over 10lbs boost, tuned, w/methanol,header, exhaust.

Anybody have a scanned copy of the magazine add? I bet there are a lot of people that would like to read it (including myself). The only problem w/ that magazine is that they love rice a bit more then I do. ...but the magazine has had tC's a bunch of times.

My boys S/C'ed tC dynoed at 238whp with
ZPI 9 PSI pulley
ZPI Crank pulley
DC sports header
Injen Intake
Borla axle back exhaust

We just finished installing a ZPI S-pipe for him as well. So, he should be in the 240whp range now. It doesn't take Meth inject for the S/C'er to reach 240whp.
but he has a FMIC - that alone is taking atleast 1lb of boost ...maybe 3lbs from him.

I was just saying that it's not as difficult as he made it out to be.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 02:35 PM
  #39  
jwaggz82's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,259
From: Earth
Default

The numbers themself are not as difficult as made out to be but I just dont know why people are getting FMIC's still. Its proven that they are a decent amount of money and lose performance. Spend $300-500 on the Methanol and you will have something proven to work.
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #40  
krdshrk's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,712
From: New Brunswick, NJ
Default

Adding a FMIC to a supercharger is idiotic.

You LOSE boost by putting on the FMIC.



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 PM.