Notices
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2005-2010 [ANT10]

My tC Had A FIRE!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #181  
Killa's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 48
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by djct_watt
I don't think the car is totalled, per the damage, but I believe that Toyota Motor Corp will likely take possession of your vehicle, as to thoroughly inspect it, as this is a new vehicle, unmodified. I think they have a vested interest to do so, and Toyota usually does a pretty good job of doing so.
If it's determined at the dealership that it was something defective from the factory, then yes... that's what will happen. If it's something about the dash lights install done at the dealership, then the dealership will fix it.... either way, the car will probably be rebuilt and sold again.

We had a car at our dealership a little while back that the A/C went out on.... just the entire A/C system, and it was traded to the customer for another car, sent back to the factory to have a completely new system installed, and then sent back to us to sell again... sitting on the lot right now with only 1,200 miles on it.

So if it's a factory defect, factory fixes it... dealership goof up... dealership should fix it... or that's the way our stuff works.
Old May 19, 2005 | 04:17 PM
  #182  
gavmitchau's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 423
Default

. .
Old May 19, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #183  
LED-Maniac's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 429
Default

well good luck with the mazda

Get ready to see the dealer alot csause those puppies crap out alot!
Old May 24, 2005 | 05:26 AM
  #184  
mfbenson's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 684
From: Somewhere, USA
Default

I just had an idea - is it possible that the short circuit was caused by condensation creating a circuit across two wires?

I just had bizarre experience with condensation inside the CD player. You can read about it at

https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...728&highlight=
Old May 24, 2005 | 05:30 AM
  #185  
Stretch_Uncensored's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 140
From: Fresno, CA
Default

I dunno.... i cant seem to get the pics up....
Old May 27, 2005 | 10:09 PM
  #186  
mredz's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 144
Default

Originally Posted by LED-Maniac
well good luck with the mazda

Get ready to see the dealer alot csause those puppies crap out alot!
what are you smoking? Mazdas have excellent quality ratings and the 3 has received tons of positive press.
Old May 28, 2005 | 05:42 AM
  #187  
SassyScion's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 406
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by mredz
what are you smoking? Mazdas have excellent quality ratings and the 3 has received tons of positive press.
Mazdas only get like 100K out of their motors before you need to replace them.
Old May 28, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #188  
LED-Maniac's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by mredz
Originally Posted by LED-Maniac
well good luck with the mazda

Get ready to see the dealer alot csause those puppies crap out alot!
what are you smoking? Mazdas have excellent quality ratings and the 3 has received tons of positive press.
lets see here,

A. FORD owns part of them, they occasionally use the same parts etc.....

B. They can receive all the good press, zoom zoom, or whatever. That doesnt mean they build a good car, in fact they build cars that dont last as long as hondas or toyotas.

C. Friend just bought a mazda 6, and the rear doorlocks arent working anymore. Sure that will happen to anycar, but i can guarantee you that thats just the beginning of his problems.

sorry for hijacking this thread lol
Old May 28, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #189  
tc_is_for_turbo_charged's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 112
From: www.carantics.com
Default

My 1994 Mazda MX6 145K miles when I sold it, my1992 Mazda Miata 189K miles and going strong. It depends alot on how well maintained the vehicle is. "Only get like 100K miles" is BullCrap. I've seen Hondas and Toyotas crap out early too.

The 3 is not a bad choice. If something bad happened to my tC, I'd get another tC. Personal preferance.
Old May 28, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #190  
05-RS1's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,379
From: Houston, TX
Default

hope that doesnt happen to any other tC's
Old May 28, 2005 | 09:42 PM
  #191  
sciontc_mich's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,900
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by tc is for turbo charged
My 1994 Mazda MX6 145K miles when I sold it, my1992 Mazda Miata 189K miles and going strong. It depends alot on how well maintained the vehicle is. "Only get like 100K miles" is BullCrap. I've seen Hondas and Toyotas crap out early too.

The 3 is not a bad choice. If something bad happened to my tC, I'd get another tC. Personal preferance.

not to change the thread.. but i had to respond to this.. to compare a mazda from 94 and 92 is NOT the same as 2005-2006! Ford did not participate in designing their engines back then! those were mazda only.. shared parts were more like ford was taking from mazda's part bin rather than mazda taking from Ford..

So no you can't compare the 1994 and 1992 reliability and long lasting qualities to today's mazda.. just not the same anymore..

and yeah nothing perfect with honda and toyota, this is true we live in an imperfect world.. but odds are mazda taking Ford parts.. the car will not last as long as toyota.. especially the engine..
Old May 28, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #192  
Rivulent's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by sciontc_mich
Originally Posted by tc is for turbo charged
My 1994 Mazda MX6 145K miles when I sold it, my1992 Mazda Miata 189K miles and going strong. It depends alot on how well maintained the vehicle is. "Only get like 100K miles" is BullCrap. I've seen Hondas and Toyotas crap out early too.

The 3 is not a bad choice. If something bad happened to my tC, I'd get another tC. Personal preferance.

not to change the thread.. but i had to respond to this.. to compare a mazda from 94 and 92 is NOT the same as 2005-2006! Ford did not participate in designing their engines back then! those were mazda only.. shared parts were more like ford was taking from mazda's part bin rather than mazda taking from Ford..

So no you can't compare the 1994 and 1992 reliability and long lasting qualities to today's mazda.. just not the same anymore..

and yeah nothing perfect with honda and toyota, this is true we live in an imperfect world.. but odds are mazda taking Ford parts.. the car will not last as long as toyota.. especially the engine..

Hmm, well.. the second generation MX-6's had engines produced in Michigan for both the Probe and the MX-6. The KL03 was used in the v6's in America, and the KLZE was used for the v6's in Japan. Different heads, emissions standards, etc. I had a kl03 mx-6 for a year and half as my first car, before I gave it to my brother when i bought the tC. Has 230k miles on it, still going somewhat strong.. needs a new head gasket, so it runs through oil every 3rd or so gas tank. But hey, everything still works pretty much, so I can vouch for the reliability.
Old May 28, 2005 | 09:52 PM
  #193  
sciontc_mich's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,900
From: Michigan
Default

yes.. but they were not ford engines.. they were mazda, ford was using their parts.. just like the escort 1991-1995 was based off the 323 mazda.. and the probe was just a different body style of the mx-6.. my point was.. ford using mazda parts, not the other way around.. that's why they were lasting, they were NOT ford parts..
Old May 28, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #194  
Rivulent's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by sciontc_mich
yes.. but they were not ford engines.. they were mazda, ford was using their parts.. just like the escort 1991-1995 was based off the 323 mazda.. and the probe was just a different body style of the mx-6.. my point was.. ford using mazda parts, not the other way around.. that's why they were lasting, they were NOT ford parts..
American made though, I think it was under the ford badge. Don't quote me on it. Trust me, I don't like Ford a single bit. Nothing I laugh at more is seeing a ford truck that cost the guy 20k come rolling up in the shop with no power windows or locks. I hate how some of these American companies cut corners to save a few bucks.. but that's another discussion. As far as reliability, it has a LOT to do with how you maintain your vehicle, period.
Old May 28, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #195  
sciontc_mich's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,900
From: Michigan
Default

oh yeah the parts were under the ford name. really surprised people that ford was lasting so long.. until the truth is revealed that they really weren't "ford parts" but mazda rebadged as ford..

Yeah I think the american companies need to get their act together.. It's not the american worker, it's the management putting these parts out, etc.. but hey i'm just changing the thread.. apologize..

and yeah maintenance does play a part.. i agree.. but on the other hand, have also seen perfect maintenance, babied the car, and it still dies..

toyota may not be perfect either, avalon has steering issues, prius has a computer problem (stalling), etc.. etc.. nothing's perfect but the odds are in more favor towards toyota when it comes to correcting a problem instead of making excuses..
Old May 29, 2005 | 12:18 AM
  #196  
mrtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 260
From: PNW
Default

Mazda > Ford. Still.

That's why Ford wants to be their partner.
Old May 29, 2005 | 06:09 AM
  #197  
LED-Maniac's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 429
Default

yes toyotsas will take a greater beating, all i was saying is maxdas take the least of all the jap imports and die young. And mazda is also doing things the otherway around too, in terms of badging. look @ the mazda tribute and their light pickup truck.......all ford chasis, all ford junk!
Old May 29, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #198  
mredz's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 144
Default

Your dreaming if you think mazda makes poor quality cars, just because they lag a little behind toyota and honda doesnt make them bad cars. Atleast they've got some style in their line-up... until the scion lable there wasnt a toyota I'd ever consider owning.
http://www.jdpower.com/pdf/2003023.p...vey%20car'
http://used-cars.autos.yahoo.com/con...used_cars.html
Old May 29, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #199  
raWr215's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 893
From: Philly/Wilmington
Default Re: My tC Had A FIRE!

Originally Posted by JimAllison
Looks like an electrical fire has ruined my tC. Here are some pictures on my website: http://www.jimallison.net
i see mazda picture? O_o
Old May 29, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #200  
mrbridge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 529
From: Northern Cali
Default

He removed them.



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 AM.