So...I just test drove a 06 Civic Si...
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by MVPlaya
I don't honestly believe anyone who says they were deciding between the tC and the Si and could legitimately afford both vehicles chose the tC. Legitimately as in literally afford the Si with insurance, etc....If insurance was too high for the Si and you chose the tC..then you couldn't run with the civic and thats definitely understandable.
However, anything else...yep you're bull____ting. Maybe even those few people who already had a set-up already planned when they bought the tC. As in those who actually bought to the tC with the set-up all at once...but then again if this was the case you'd be moving into the 350z range. So, again I'd still call BS.
Possibly those who needed the room and didn't care about the performance...however the Si only comes in 6-speed so anyone choosing between the tC and Si would generally be under the performance demographic by default.
Anyways...I enjoyed it. The car had a short shifter, upgraded exhaust, lowered, and rims, so it wasn't really tuned with at all as far as performance goes.
I also liked the front interior more, but the back seats the tC definitely gets an edge.
Nice car...
However, anything else...yep you're bull____ting. Maybe even those few people who already had a set-up already planned when they bought the tC. As in those who actually bought to the tC with the set-up all at once...but then again if this was the case you'd be moving into the 350z range. So, again I'd still call BS.
Possibly those who needed the room and didn't care about the performance...however the Si only comes in 6-speed so anyone choosing between the tC and Si would generally be under the performance demographic by default.
Anyways...I enjoyed it. The car had a short shifter, upgraded exhaust, lowered, and rims, so it wasn't really tuned with at all as far as performance goes.
I also liked the front interior more, but the back seats the tC definitely gets an edge.
Nice car...
Originally Posted by torqueTc
^^ dude your only 18.. You JUST got the right to vote, not to tell people what they can and cant afford. Again, thats your opinion. My car was paid IN CASH IN FULL by me (no mommy and daddy help here).
Honestly, all this talk about the civic is making me sick. I am not sure who your speaking about that makes 20k a year. I dont even know how someone could pay RENT and eat - AND own a brand new car on 20k.
I have to ask - Do you live with your parents? or are you in school (where they paid for it) or do you have to come up with $1200 every month for your mortgage (like some of us that have a few years age on you) yet, not factoring in home owners insurance, insurance on 4 vehicles (even though every vehicle is paid for) plus other real world bills (cellphone, food, cable, internet, electricity, gas, water, trash bill, umm clothes, GAS, entertainment, and SOME people on here might even have children ) must I go on??
Your statement again is the tc vs the SI.. it would only be a $75 a month increase over the long run in monthly payments.. I know almost everyone on here COULD afford that, its not even $20 a week.
What was your point again?
Honestly, all this talk about the civic is making me sick. I am not sure who your speaking about that makes 20k a year. I dont even know how someone could pay RENT and eat - AND own a brand new car on 20k.
I have to ask - Do you live with your parents? or are you in school (where they paid for it) or do you have to come up with $1200 every month for your mortgage (like some of us that have a few years age on you) yet, not factoring in home owners insurance, insurance on 4 vehicles (even though every vehicle is paid for) plus other real world bills (cellphone, food, cable, internet, electricity, gas, water, trash bill, umm clothes, GAS, entertainment, and SOME people on here might even have children ) must I go on??
Your statement again is the tc vs the SI.. it would only be a $75 a month increase over the long run in monthly payments.. I know almost everyone on here COULD afford that, its not even $20 a week.
What was your point again?
Great you paid your car FULL IN CASH! With no help...thats awsome man. What are you trying to impress me?
Do you know how many kids at my school (I'm in college) have a tC. It is the most common car by far at ANY college. All of my friends tell me from their schools too. It's ridiculous.
I'm sure you've read the article on here, but the tC is the most common college student car. So I mean what, are typing behind your computer telling me you paid in cash and you live on your own means something to me? It means NOTHING to me, you're 27 I'm 18. If you feel the need to speak down on those when they are in the same position as you, and you're older...I know you must feel like crap.
You're pretty ____ poor at even making this realistic tho. At this point I know you're not even worth it anymore...you're mind is just not built for what I'm saying.
I was making an exaggerated example. It was pretty clear what I was saying.
If you have to give up a big part of your future (new home) and cut down on an extreme amount of expenses today (as you all listed) just to buy a new car, YOU CANNOT AFFORD THE CAR. Just because you can cut back extremely in other areas to buy a car. And you guys are saying, oh I can stop my mortgage and buy a better car, so that means I can afford it!
yep, thats the mindset that got you where you are today buddy.
75 more dollars?
That depends on how long you financed it, and so many factors. Why would you make a comment like that?
Originally Posted by dlion
This thread is beyond retardedness... What is the point of this anyway? Anyone in their right mind can tell you that current gen si is a LOT more performance oriented than a tc. We have people in this thread talking about how they didn't wanna pay 2xxxx for A CIVIC?!?! Who cares if they call it a "civic?" At the end of the day, it is still a faster car. Claiming you can't justify spending 20k+ ON A CIVIC, just means you didn't have the money. Then we get people talking about what they can afford... Sure, any 18-24 old kid mooching off the parents can buy a pretty nice car on low wages, but why does this even matter? The topic of post is si vs tc... Should have been a dead topic. Then we get people carrying on about gas mileage and other little knitpicks, that are just lame! If you could sacrifice mpg for performance, on your tc, you are telling me you wouldn't? Don't take me as a troll either, I am a current scion owner, and have had civics previously. I'm glad I got the tc over the si (yes, I could AFFORD it). Doing a performance comparision is not a good idea, the si definately outperforms the tc, but if you are concerned about performance, why are you buying tc's and civics? Either one is relatively expensive to make fast, not too loud, reliable, and easily driveable.
Why buy a tC or Civic if we cared about performance? Well all of us are given a price range, so since we are in the Si/tC price range, tell me what car we'd get for performance at that point?
The GTi is just about as fast as the Si. However the GTi has a turbo...a little bit more, but still thats not performance right?
Anyone in their right mind can tell you that current gen si is a LOT more performance oriented than a tc.
[quote="HR_Guy"
What in the blue hell are you saying?
Do you know that Porsche makes the MOST reliable cars? Some crazy statistic like 95% of all Porsche's that were ever made are still running today.
That was like me telling you the I smoked an SLR with my stock tC...if you have ANY idea what I'm talking about.

LOL @ this thread.
Porsche does not make the most reliable cars. Find me where it says 95% of them are still running.[/quote]
Someone also said that just because the Porsche is more, doesn't mean it's more reliable, as if that was any part of my logic...why would I pick a Porsche out of a Benz or a Aston Martin?
I never said Porsche is the most reliable car. It's a crazy fact, I forgot where I found it...95% is probably a bit extreme but it was a high number...I believe about 90% or so.
Porsche's are very good, DD worthy cars. I see this ____ everyday, you don't have to believe me. It doesn't matter! Hahahah...I'm just telling you what it is, if you want statistics then find it. If you don't want to believe me then don't.
However, if you're sitting here telling me that Porsche's are not reliable cars...it's to a point where I'm not going to even debate on any car outside the 30,000 mark with you guys...done.
What in the blue hell are you saying?
Do you know that Porsche makes the MOST reliable cars? Some crazy statistic like 95% of all Porsche's that were ever made are still running today.
That was like me telling you the I smoked an SLR with my stock tC...if you have ANY idea what I'm talking about.
LOL @ this thread.
Porsche does not make the most reliable cars. Find me where it says 95% of them are still running.[/quote]
Someone also said that just because the Porsche is more, doesn't mean it's more reliable, as if that was any part of my logic...why would I pick a Porsche out of a Benz or a Aston Martin?
I never said Porsche is the most reliable car. It's a crazy fact, I forgot where I found it...95% is probably a bit extreme but it was a high number...I believe about 90% or so.
Porsche's are very good, DD worthy cars. I see this ____ everyday, you don't have to believe me. It doesn't matter! Hahahah...I'm just telling you what it is, if you want statistics then find it. If you don't want to believe me then don't.
However, if you're sitting here telling me that Porsche's are not reliable cars...it's to a point where I'm not going to even debate on any car outside the 30,000 mark with you guys...done.
Aight, so it has gotten blown up out of proporation from the original topic.
No one is better than anybody on here. I'm not better than you. You're aren't better than me...
On topic...
...
*goes to thread about someone trading in their tC for an Si*
No one is better than anybody on here. I'm not better than you. You're aren't better than me...
On topic...
...
*goes to thread about someone trading in their tC for an Si*
Originally Posted by MVPlaya
When buying a car, customer service will just determine who and where I will buy the car from, not the car itself. You must be a flippin' idiot if you let customer service determine your car.
I guess my story was incomplete. If you had bothered to ask instead of judge, you would have found out that it wasnt just one dealer that was giving me crap. Every Honda dealer I went to gave me the same line of "a couple of weeks if you put down a deposit now." In the end, I did put down my deposit with the dealer who I thought was going to give me the least BS. Turns out I was wrong. Not to mention that the Honda dealers were all much more agressive.
As far as customer service is concerned, I think I made my point. I was brought up to believe that customers should be treated honestly and fairly, which Honda (in the Cleveland area) did not do. Based on that principle, Honda did not deserve my business. No matter how great a car is, its pointless to take it up the a$$ for it, and there is always a competing model that will compare, and in this case, the S/C tC was the one. Toyota treated me well, and earned my business. End of story
Originally Posted by HunterGreene
Originally Posted by MVPlaya
When buying a car, customer service will just determine who and where I will buy the car from, not the car itself. You must be a flippin' idiot if you let customer service determine your car.
I guess my story was incomplete. If you had bothered to ask instead of judge, you would have found out that it wasnt just one dealer that was giving me crap. Every Honda dealer I went to gave me the same line of "a couple of weeks if you put down a deposit now." In the end, I did put down my deposit with the dealer who I thought was going to give me the least BS. Turns out I was wrong. Not to mention that the Honda dealers were all much more agressive.
As far as customer service is concerned, I think I made my point. I was brought up to believe that customers should be treated honestly and fairly, which Honda (in the Cleveland area) did not do. Based on that principle, Honda did not deserve my business. No matter how great a car is, its pointless to take it up the a$$ for it, and there is always a competing model that will compare, and in this case, the S/C tC was the one. Toyota treated me well, and earned my business. End of story
i drove the new 4 door si, and it was a nice car, but until vtec kicked in it was really not anything special. for the extra that your paying for the si, id say get the tc and mod it out with what ever you want to suit you. The tc is such a good deal for what you pay, and ive never had a problem with it 29000 miles later.
On tC versus Si:
They are cars with different characteristics. Some people like one over the other. They move at the same rate when crawling through traffic though. How many of you will dump the clutch to get those 13~15 sec quarter miles over and over again?
On auto finances:
I can afford an EVO, STi, 350Z, etc. Why haven't I purchased the said cars? By making smart financial decisions and not buy things that do not maximize my investment. My goal for a car was a sporty daily driver. A 350Z will do nothing for me when I'm stuck in morning traffic that a tC can't do. $3000 yearly insurance for speedy cars also irks me. I don't like getting ripped off by the insurance companies.
On maturity:
Age and maturity are two different things. Your opinions are fine, but at least fact check some of those statements you believe to be true.
They are cars with different characteristics. Some people like one over the other. They move at the same rate when crawling through traffic though. How many of you will dump the clutch to get those 13~15 sec quarter miles over and over again?
On auto finances:
I can afford an EVO, STi, 350Z, etc. Why haven't I purchased the said cars? By making smart financial decisions and not buy things that do not maximize my investment. My goal for a car was a sporty daily driver. A 350Z will do nothing for me when I'm stuck in morning traffic that a tC can't do. $3000 yearly insurance for speedy cars also irks me. I don't like getting ripped off by the insurance companies.
On maturity:
Age and maturity are two different things. Your opinions are fine, but at least fact check some of those statements you believe to be true.
Originally Posted by TrafficinLA
On tC versus Si:
They are cars with different characteristics. Some people like one over the other. They move at the same rate when crawling through traffic though. How many of you will dump the clutch to get those 13~15 sec quarter miles over and over again?
On auto finances:
I can afford an EVO, STi, 350Z, etc. Why haven't I purchased the said cars? By making smart financial decisions and not buy things that do not maximize my investment. My goal for a car was a sporty daily driver. A 350Z will do nothing for me when I'm stuck in morning traffic that a tC can't do.
They are cars with different characteristics. Some people like one over the other. They move at the same rate when crawling through traffic though. How many of you will dump the clutch to get those 13~15 sec quarter miles over and over again?
On auto finances:
I can afford an EVO, STi, 350Z, etc. Why haven't I purchased the said cars? By making smart financial decisions and not buy things that do not maximize my investment. My goal for a car was a sporty daily driver. A 350Z will do nothing for me when I'm stuck in morning traffic that a tC can't do.
I'm more than content with going fast after seeing the results.
Originally Posted by MVPlaya
Originally Posted by cwayne
High reving cars are usually overpriced.
Civic SI: $24,000
Corolla XRS: $19,000
Celica GTS: $24,000
RSX-S: $24,000
My Scion only cost me $18,000 and if I want more power, I just spend another $2,200 on TRD supercharger (price went down) and I have power and torque.
Civic SI: $24,000
Corolla XRS: $19,000
Celica GTS: $24,000
RSX-S: $24,000
My Scion only cost me $18,000 and if I want more power, I just spend another $2,200 on TRD supercharger (price went down) and I have power and torque.
Originally Posted by MVPlaya
Originally Posted by cwayne
Originally Posted by djct_watt
Why are you even here if you love the Si so much. Most of us are going to disagree with you, and you should know that.
I don't think I've said anything stupid. My thread got attention and opinions...created some conversation.
This is funny. You DID say Porsche makes the most reliable cars. If you're going to claim that Porsche makes the most reliable cars, don't tell others to go find the proof when you can't even prove it yourself. You should really stop pulling facts out of your @sshole.
I also never said they are not reliable. Not sure where that came from, but whatever floats your boat kid. Now go back to mommy and daddy and cry about the Si...maybe they'll buy you one
Calling an Si a performance car...what a joke.
I also never said they are not reliable. Not sure where that came from, but whatever floats your boat kid. Now go back to mommy and daddy and cry about the Si...maybe they'll buy you one
Calling an Si a performance car...what a joke.
Reliability and quality aren't the same thing, but they're somewhat related:

Toyota's quality has been going the way of the Titanic. I hope they start to shape up.
I haven't seen a Porsche dead on the side of the road. That's because there aren't that many of them to begin with and most of their owners have money so they have them well maintained.
The rest of the european brands are just pathetically low on the scale. VW and Land Rover?

Toyota's quality has been going the way of the Titanic. I hope they start to shape up.
I haven't seen a Porsche dead on the side of the road. That's because there aren't that many of them to begin with and most of their owners have money so they have them well maintained.
The rest of the european brands are just pathetically low on the scale. VW and Land Rover?
I believe JD Power's rating is based off problems reported within the first 90 days of ownership. I wouldn't expect that to be interpreted as being the most reliable car. Initial quality and longevity are different. Otherwise that list would indicate Hyundai is more reliable than most manufacturers.






