Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

Removal of airbox snorkle-BIG MPG! UPDATE 4.0!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 01:47 PM
  #361  
HeathenBrewing's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,457
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by thetoaster
thats funny, in all my years in building cars, the whole idea is to keep the intake temp as low as possible and the exhaust temp as high as possible. i.e. intercoolers and heat wrap the headers. i dont see how hot air can do anything for your motor other than rob hp. jmo
In case you missed the title of this thread, it is about increasing MPG not HP.

Warm air = more MPG
Cold air = more HP.
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 12:15 AM
  #362  
thetoaster's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Default

i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 12:34 AM
  #363  
pooder's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 649
From: Rochester MN
Default

Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header
Prius? All the extra complication . . . and cost . . . and reduced cargo capacity?? I think NOT!! We LIKE our xBoxen!!!!
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 01:17 AM
  #364  
thetoaster's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Default

a men to that one
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #365  
BoxOffice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,031
From: Silver Surfer
Default

Originally Posted by pooder
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header
Prius? All the extra complication . . . and cost . . . and reduced cargo capacity?? I think NOT!! We LIKE our xBoxen!!!!
Not to mention the additional $7K - $10K price of admission!
According to my calculations, that would buy a $&!%LOAD of gas!
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 02:58 AM
  #366  
Super-Stormtrooper07's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 913
From: In Detention block AA-23!
Default

here is a auction for a cheap $ going K&N drop in:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/K-N-A...spagenameZWDVW

I'm thinking about doing this snorkle design trick, but probably using a TRD drop-in.
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 08:46 AM
  #367  
bB2NER's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,808
From: West TN - Land of twisty roads
Default

Originally Posted by BoxOffice
Originally Posted by pooder
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header
Prius? All the extra complication . . . and cost . . . and reduced cargo capacity?? I think NOT!! We LIKE our xBoxen!!!!
Not to mention the additional $7K - $10K price of admission!
According to my calculations, that would buy a $&!%LOAD of gas!
Plus you'd still be driving a Prius. Yuck!

That used K&N filter ebay thing is funny. With shipping it's the same price as a new one!
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #368  
TheUglyOne's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 167
From: Orange, CA
Default

Alright me being a previous mustang guy I can relate to these kind of experiments. I think mustang owners have put together some of the Weirdest/most effecient/least effecient CAI/RAI out there. Next weekend when I have time I am going to remove the lower snorkel and add a K&N air filter to it and I will let you all know the results. By then I will be passed 5k miles and hopefully my engine will have finished it's breaking in period.
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 04:28 PM
  #369  
dz302's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 551
From: Aiken, SC
Default

Originally Posted by TheUglyOne
Alright me being a previous mustang guy I can relate to these kind of experiments. I think mustang owners have put together some of the Weirdest/most effecient/least effecient CAI/RAI out there. Next weekend when I have time I am going to remove the lower snorkel and add a K&N air filter to it and I will let you all know the results. By then I will be passed 5k miles and hopefully my engine will have finished it's breaking in period.
I just took my snorkel off today and filled my tank. I should now something in about 5 days when I fill up again. I figure it can't hurt to take off the snorkel. If nothing else it cleans the engine compartment up a bit !!!
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #370  
BoxOffice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,031
From: Silver Surfer
Default

Originally Posted by dz302
I figure it can't hurt to take off the snorkel. If nothing else it cleans the engine compartment up a bit !!!
Well, that's taking a positive outlook on things!
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 11:45 PM
  #371  
cobb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,084
From: Richmond, VA
Default

I tried it early on. I am mixed on it myself. At the same time I put mobile 1 in my manual tranny, so may not be a good test. I will say it did go up 1mpg, but my interstate use is mixed with traffic and accidents. I think on gas savers . org the better idea is to take it off the exhaust manifold and or plug in a dummy value into the oxygen or temp sensor so it runs leaner than normal.

I have the stock filter as it seems fairly free flowing and the modified one aint cheap.
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 02:16 PM
  #372  
HeathenBrewing's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,457
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header
Actually you did miss....everything.

This is an xB thread, not a Prius thread.
This is about increasing the mPG for the box, not the most fuel efficient car.
As mentioned, 10-15K more would buy enough fuel for the lifetime of my box.
You missed the title of this thread....again.
Some other points were mentioned as well.

If you reread what you wrote, you went into a rant about robbing HP from your motor w/ warmer air. Totally had nothing to do with the thread dude.

Old Aug 13, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #373  
dz302's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 551
From: Aiken, SC
Default

Originally Posted by HeathenBrewing
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header
Actually you did miss....everything.

This is an xB thread, not a Prius thread.
This is about increasing the mPG for the box, not the most fuel efficient car.
As mentioned, 10-15K more would buy enough fuel for the lifetime of my box.
You missed the title of this thread....again.
Some other points were mentioned as well.

If you reread what you wrote, you went into a rant about robbing HP from your motor w/ warmer air. Totally had nothing to do with the thread dude.

Thank you for pointing out the obvious. Some folks need that. I don't understand his rant, but hey, it's Monday and I'm good !!!
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #374  
BoxOffice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,031
From: Silver Surfer
Default


Ah, the joys of on-line forums!
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 07:18 AM
  #375  
Super-Stormtrooper07's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 913
From: In Detention block AA-23!
Default

I did this mod today, with a drop in TRD filter, reset the ECU, then right after I went to Chevron and filled my tank w/ 87 octane. I did not notice much of a engine noise change from before- maybe slight.

I'll check back with my results. I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element. I drive a 5-speed 2006(last date produced) xA. I'll make sure my air pressure is proper(need to invest in a nice pressure guage) , the tires were last checked about 2 weeks ago, I'll check them again in about a week.

BoxOffice , I hope some of your good Scion vibes rub off on my Scion. It would be dope if I can get 5-6 more MPG's per gallon... that would be like saving $4 per tank of gas- or its basically like adding an extra gallon to our smaller gas tanks!!!!
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #376  
vintage42's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Originally Posted by Super-Stormtrooper07
... with a drop in TRD filter, reset the ECU...
I just changed my dirty air filter and put in a clean one. Do you have to reset the ECU when you put in a clean filter?
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 06:41 PM
  #377  
JDMJim's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,152
Default

I never reset my ECU and got a significant jump in mileage anyway. So I wouldn't know.
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #378  
BoxOffice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,031
From: Silver Surfer
Default

Originally Posted by Super-Stormtrooper07
I did this mod today, with a drop in TRD filter, reset the ECU, then right after I went to Chevron and filled my tank w/ 87 octane. I did not notice much of a engine noise change from before- maybe slight.

I'll check back with my results. I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element. I drive a 5-speed 2006(last date produced) xA. I'll make sure my air pressure is proper(need to invest in a nice pressure guage) , the tires were last checked about 2 weeks ago, I'll check them again in about a week.

BoxOffice , I hope some of your good Scion vibes rub off on my Scion. It would be dope if I can get 5-6 more MPG's per gallon... that would be like saving $4 per tank of gas- or its basically like adding an extra gallon to our smaller gas tanks!!!!
Good luck!
Keep in mind that it seems like quite a few people haven't gotten much in the way of results for a tank or two (why, I don't know, other than the possible ECU re-set), so don't be disappointed if things don't improve right away.
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 07:21 PM
  #379  
BoxOffice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,031
From: Silver Surfer
Default

Speaking of which, I just got the best tank I've had in a while - constant A/C has been killing my mileage.
All city driving, plenty of A/C use, but drove pretty carefully for the whole tank = 390 miles!
That worked out to a decent 37.65 mpg!
Can't wait for fall and cooler weather (no A/C!).
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #380  
typhoonorchid's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 506
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Super-Stormtrooper07
I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element.
Are you saying that the 15" steelies weight 19 lbs. each? That's a lot higher then I would have thought.

Unfortunately your tires are heavier and since they are the farthest out from the hub, they become the most consequential weight on your whole wheel/tire package.



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49 AM.